80 pages • 2 hours read
Robert GreeneA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
The book’s author, Robert Greene, stumbled on the theme of his work while working as a writer in Hollywood. Prior to writing his bestseller, Greene travelled around Europe, struggling to find an appropriate channel for his writing. Interestingly, Greene, who had to work low-wage jobs to support his writing, had relatively low status until he turned his attention to the study of power. This topic proved irresistible to the public, as Greene predicted that despite the social expectation to “seem fair and decent,” those who lacked power over others were “miserable” and hungry for a manual that would teach them how to reverse their fortune (24).
While the book was a bestseller, Greene’s emphasis on the amorality of power meant that some influential people did not want to be seen as openly promoting the book for fear of gaining a reputation for power-hunger. Some critics even assumed that Greene himself lacked morality, as they confused the message with the messenger. Greene, for his part, believes he is neither good nor evil, only a realist. In a Guardian interview, he maintained that he “described a reality that no other book tried to describe […] I felt all the self-help books out there were so gooey and Pollyanna-ish and nauseating” (Lynskey). Arguably, Greene’s position stems from his belief that human character does not improve and that old power structures repeat from one generation to another, even if outwardly, the circumstances appear different. While other self-help authors point toward the possibility of a more ideal world, Greene seeks to help people thrive in the existing status quo with all of its flaws and injustices.
In the acknowledgements to his book, Greene refers to “the timelessness of Machiavelli,” the author of the 1513 guide to power, The Prince (9). A diplomat and a historian, Machiavelli was also an official in the Florentine republic. His book, which imagines how a new prince can claim and maintain power, was inspired by the strategies he witnessed firsthand at court, such as those of his contemporary Cesare Borgia. Over time, Machiavelli has become infamous for his promotion of ruthless tactics which ensure that one person profits at the expense of others. To this day, the epithet Machiavellian denotes a person who will play underhanded power games and stop at nothing to get what they want. Greene’s amoral stance has caused those in the media to dub him a modern Machiavellian.
Machiavelli crops up often in Greene’s laws, offering advice that is less socially acceptable by modern standards, but ensures a timeless hold on power. For example, Greene cites Machiavelli in the law that it is essential to keep people dependent on you, reminding the reader that “it is better to be feared than loved. Fear you can control; love, never” (179). Here, Machiavelli’s advice flies in the face of the ideals of the modern self-help movement, while Greene reminds us that love can be “subtle and changeable” and so unlike fear, does nothing to maintain the security of your position (179). Greene’s stance that there is no alternative to playing by the laws of power and that it is futile to wish for a more peaceful ideal also stems from Machiavelli, who claimed that “the prophet who preaches and brings change can only survive by taking up arms” and therefore use force to maintain his revolution (712).
Baldassare Castiglione was an Italian courtier, diplomat, and soldier. He was most famous for his 1528 publication, The Book of the Courtier, a treatise on how to adopt the veneer of nobility and so thrive in the atmosphere of a court, where appearances are everything.
Greene maintains that human nature and power structures have not substantially changed since Castiglione’s time and that we still need to possess the subtlety and social graces of Renaissance courtiers if we are to have influence over others. Castiglione features most prominently in Greene’s 30th law that accomplishments should seem effortless. Castiglione’s notion of “sprezzatura, the capacity to make the difficult seem easy” is essential to having one’s talents overestimated by others and so gain power (450).
While the courtiers of Castiglione’s time performed sophisticated feats, they always maintained the appearance that it came naturally to them. This made them seem akin to gods or forces of nature, provoking awe in bystanders. While Castiglione’s injunction goes against the modern trend for exhibiting and even boasting about hard work, Greene maintains that revealing “the inner workings of your creation” diminishes your intelligence in the eyes of others (451). They think you are mortal just like them and what is equal can never be more powerful.
Louis XIV ascended to the French throne in 1654 and was so powerful and majestic that he came to be known as the Sun King. He ruled as an autocrat, and his reign represented the height of Bourbon monarchic power.
Louis XIV is a frequently recurring character in Greene’s book, as he devoted much of his life to magnifying his own power. He expertly fulfilled Greene’s 41st law, of avoiding stepping into a great man’s shoes despite being the inheritor of immense privilege; he sought to distinguish himself from his forbears by rejecting his ancestral home the Louvre and building a new palace, Versailles. Greene explains how Louis XIV built Versailles “in what was then the middle of nowhere, symbolizing that this was a new order he had founded, one without precedent” (628). Versailles, which was the most lavish court in Europe and attended by the “most brilliant minds of the age” meant that Louis XIV became incomparable, and following his death, some became so reliant on him being around that they imagined France would go to ruin without him (628).
In addition to magnifying his own power, Louis XIV also figures as someone who thwarted the power of others. In the first law, Greene warns his readers to not outshine their masters by citing the example of Louis XIV’s finance minister, Nicolas Fouquet. Louis XIV felt threatened by Fouquet’s charisma and ingenuity, viewing it as a threat to his own. As a result, when Fouquet hosted a party at his newly completed château, featuring a glittering guest-list and a seven-course dinner with incomparable foods, Louis XIV found an excuse to have Fouquet arrested and imprisoned, while he used Fouquet’s architects and designers to build Versailles.
As Louis XIV was the more powerful figure in the social hierarchy, Fouquet’s ostentatious efforts to impress Louis backfired as the “elaborate party offended the king’s vanity” (38), and he banished Fouquet to a place where he could never outshine Louis again. Here, Greene offers no apology for Louis’ behavior, only stating it as an extreme example of how ruthless the powerful can be with those who appear to be trying to beat them at their own game.
Elizabeth I of England ascended the throne in 1558. As a queen in a patriarchal system, she had less symbolic power than a king. The expectation was that she should marry and produce a preferably male heir. However, as the prime proponent of Greene’s 20th law, which mandates refraining from committing to others, Elizabeth knew that whichever man she chose would take away her ruling powers and divide the kingdom. Greene explains how “by committing to an alliance with one party or nation, the queen becomes embroiled in conflicts that are not of her choosing, conflicts which may eventually overwhelm her or lead her into a futile war” (273). She therefore entertained the idea of marriage with several suitors and became an object of fantasy, doing everything in her power to “stir their interest and simultaneously keep them at bay” (271). Exciting sexual interest meant that Elizabeth remained in the public’s imagination, while never marrying enabled her to retain her power.
As a queen who rules alone, Elizabeth I is also emblematic of Greene’s conception of a formless, modern style of leadership. Given that a queen in a patriarchal society stands to be punished for both emotional attachment and authoritarian aloofness, she is best served by adopting a “flexible style of governing that in the end often proves more powerful than the more direct, male form” (766). Greene emphasizes that this style of power is more amenable to subjects as they feel seduced rather than coerced and so do not mount rebellions. Rulers such as Elizabeth play the “chameleon—conform on the surface, while breaking down your enemy from the inside” (768). Elizabeth’s style of ruling is thus more accessible to those who do not have the same trappings of power as a male, authoritarian Louis XIV.
By Robert Greene
Books About Leadership
View Collection
Business & Economics
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Required Reading Lists
View Collection
Self-Help Books
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
Trust & Doubt
View Collection