61 pages • 2 hours read
Ernest J. GainesA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The themes of race and racism figure prominently in this story. The opening scene features a courtroom where a 21-year-old Black man stands accused of being complicit in the death of a white shopkeeper. The narrator explains that everyone already knows how this must end: The young Black man must die because there can be no justice for him in the white courts. The all-white jury finds him guilty over lunch and sentences him to death by electric chair.
Grant Wiggins, the protagonist, is a Black man struggling to figure out who he is apart from 300 years of slavery, racism, and white oppression. All of the characters are impacted by this history of systemic and cultural racism, but this story focuses on the plight of the Black man trying to define his own humanity within social and economic conditions that still view him as no more than a “hog.” The reminders of slavery are everywhere, including the big plantation where the characters live.
While the story takes place in 1947 Louisiana, and slavery and reconstruction ended many years ago, the culture and lifestyles haven’t really changed. The white owner of the plantation, Henri Pichot, still wields significant influence over the lives of the Black community, who still live on the plantation in the section known as the “quarter.” The plantation big house still has Black servants, and the fields are still maintained by Black workers and sharecroppers.
Grant teaches in the Black school and is subject to visitations from the white superintendent, whose inspections mirror those of white slave owners looking to make a new purchase. Grant continues to prepare his students for academic tests, but the superintendent is never interested in what the kids are learning. Grant himself went away to college at his aunt’s insistence because she and he both believed it would help him rise above his circumstances. Ten years after he graduates from college, Grant is still living with his aunt and still expected to use the back door when visiting the big house.
The novel is filled with daily assaults on the personhood of Black people, which serves to illuminate the theme of humanity in the Black community, in contrast to the inhumanity of the white community. In addition to daily insults like being made to wait unnecessarily, being chastised for using correct grammar, being ignored, segregated, dismissed, and reminded of the confederacy every day, members of the Black community find ways to resist, persist, and transform. This suggests that the story is one of hope in the possibility of change. At the same time, examples of conflict within the Black community show that there is much work still to be done. Biracial and light-skinned people still show contempt for darker-skinned people, Black men argue over religion, respect, and dignity. Black women still have to fight for respect and recognition from both Black men and the white community. White racism in this story is not based on “hate,” but rather superiority and subjugation. The final redemption of a single white character at the end of the novel implies that change might be possible; Paul sees Jefferson’s humanity, and thus he also sees Grant’s humanity. He offers friendship.
The story explores the question of organized religion’s capacity for liberation and transformation. By the end of the novel, it seems as though the Black church can play this role for some, but for others it is no more than another set of false promises and a false hope. Reverend Ambrose, the local pastor of the Black church, struggles to “save” both Grant and Jefferson, but he must confront that it is Grant and not himself who is able to touch Jefferson’s soul.
Grant struggles with religion throughout the story. He stopped attending church after he started attending college. His aunt, however, is devout. For her and other members of the community, there can be nothing without the church. Grant knows he is missing something to believe in, and he even refers to Sunday as the “saddest” day of the week. Vivian, his aunt, and Reverend Ambrose all try to convince him that he will feel better if he just goes to church. Grant is not convinced. Intellectually, he sees the church as just another way to keep Black men in line with white control.
When Reverend Ambrose appeals to Grant to use his influence with Jefferson to convince him to get down on his knees and be “saved” before he dies, Grant says he will not. In a moment of sincerity, Grant explains that he will not lie to Jefferson. Grant does not “believe” and so he can’t tell Jefferson to “believe.” In the end, it is Grant, a self-proclaimed lost man, who helps Jefferson find his humanity. The authenticity of religion remains ambiguous in this story. It provides Reverend Ambrose the strength he needs to be with Jefferson in that final hour, but it isn’t enough to save Jefferson. Religion also provides comfort and friendship to the women in the novel. Grant, who struggles to define who he is apart from everything he is told he is supposed to be, has yet to find peace.
Interestingly, the novel often draws the comparison between Jefferson and Jesus. Jefferson realizes he must die “like a man” for the sake of the Black community, just like Jesus died, as Jefferson notes, without saying a word. When Jefferson dies, Grant has the schoolchildren get down on their knees. The implication is that, while Grant doesn’t have faith in God, he has faith in Jefferson.
The novel demonstrates the healing and transformative power of friendship among and between Black women and Black men. At the end of the novel, transformation, redemption, and hope are shown through a new, authentic kind of friendship that crosses racial lines.
Tante Lou is by Miss Emma’s side throughout this story. She tends to her health, her heart, and her soul. The two women worked together as cooks at Henri Pichot’s plantation home. Tante Lou is there in the courtroom with her to hear the verdict, she attends almost every visit to the jail with Miss Emma, and she accompanies her to make the case for visitation to Henri Pichot and Sheriff Guidry. The women attend church together and visit with each other every day. Their shared experiences of working together, raising young men, living in the quarter, and attending church bond them together.
Friendship between the men of the quarter is not central to the story, but there seems to be an easy relationship between the men who work in the fields and deliver the wood to the school. Both Grant and Jefferson recall friendship with other boys. The difference for Grant is that most of these men are now gone. Grant explains that they left for other cities and towns, for other jobs, or for jail. Unlike himself, they find a way out of the town, but not necessarily a way to live a better life.
The relationships between and among white women and men are superficial and performative. Henri Pichot is always accompanied by Louis Rougon, but there is no indication of an authentic friendship. Louis Rougon is there to push his own agenda and support the status quo. Sam Guidry and Henri Pichot are brothers-in-law, but they have no relationship beyond obligatory custom. Edna Guidry likes to think of herself as a being in a friendship with Black women, but this is one-sided. Edna is white and performs polite interactions to appease her own guilt or protect her own sensibilities. She is an example of how years of racism and injustice prevent her from ever having an authentic friendship across racial lines. Because there are no examples of friendship between white people in the novel, there is the possibility that racism has made this impossible for white people.
It is only the relationship between Grant and Paul that evolves into an authentic friendship across racial lines. Throughout Grant’s visits to the jail, Paul shows him respect and genuine care. This extends to Jefferson as well. At the same time, Paul is a white deputy who is complicit in the unjust persecution of Black men. When Jefferson’s execution transforms him, he reaches out to Grant and states that he wants to be his “friend.” Paul does this in person by traveling to the quarter for the first time ever. He literally crosses the segregation line to bring Grant Jefferson’s journal. His gesture demonstrates a mutual respect between two men, who see each other as equals. This is the friendship that indicates hope.
The novel challenges education, like the justice system and the institution of religion, as a racist institution rather than a liberating path. The story explores the meaning of education, and the power of education to oppress as well as to empower. Tante Lou always stressed the importance of schooling to Grant. She made him go to college to try ensure a better life for him. She believed that education could make the difference, and so did Grant. When the story begins, Grant feels betrayed by education and the false promise of equality and respect that it was supposed to give him. He works as a teacher in the same school he attended. His heart is not in it because he only teaches what the white people tell him to teach. He does not feel he ever teaches what the children really need to learn about: who they are and how the world works. Grant says he wants to make a difference with his education, but being a teacher is the only thing an educated Black man in the South is allowed to do. By the end of the story, Grant has been just the teacher that Jefferson needs, but he can’t accept his own role in Jefferson’s transformation. Because the novel closes with Grant standing before his students and crying, the novel might offer hope that his teaching is transformed. Crying in front of his students has nothing to do with reading, writing, or arithmetic, but everything to do with Grant’s humanity.
The main conflict of the book, what it means to be a Black man in 1947 Louisiana, illuminates the many acts of humanity expressed by members of the Black community. These “little things,” that Grant tries to explain to Jefferson, are contrasted by the complete lack of humanity expressed by the community. The white people are complicit in maintaining the daily behaviors that perpetuate racism and inhumanity toward Black people. The white characters in this story shun their agency by denying their responsibility for these unjust social conditions. The white people of Bayonne are no longer capable of seeing the humanity in anyone. Their actions are bound by adherence to the law, to custom, and to status quo. They are devout Christians who are also comfortable with executing a 21-year-old young man as long as it isn’t too close to Easter. They require that Black people be segregated, subjugated, and controlled. The white people in charge of Jefferson’s fate make his family and friends go through daily humiliations just to visit him and bring him comfort.
Because the conditions of life are so cruel and oppressive, acts of humanity among members of the Black community are powerful and transformative. To maintain manners, cook food, teach academics, attend church, and maintain friendship is a revolutionary act of humanity. In the face of adversity, Miss Emma’s efforts to give Jefferson what he needs are remarkable. She expends what little social capital she has to get an audience with the white people who have the power and make the decisions. She prepares enough homemade food to feed all the “children” of the cell block every time she visits the jail. She supports Grant in his efforts, even when they clash with the religion she has always known. Her faith in humanity is unwavering. Because she is determined, Grant experiences his own humanity through his visitations with Jefferson, and Jefferson is able to die the man his community needs him to be.
By Ernest J. Gaines