logo

39 pages 1 hour read

Daniel H. Pink

A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2004

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Introduction-Chapter 2Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1: “The Conceptual Age”

Introduction Summary

Daniel Pink describes society as always having valued “a certain kind of mind” more than any other (1). This mind belongs to the lawyers, programmers, and MBAs of the world—those whose careers earn them more money than others. Now, the world is shifting; creators, “pattern recognizers, and meaning makers” are on the rise and are taking back control (1). Pink attributes this change to society’s transition away from the Information Age into the Conceptual Age.

The Introduction then shifts to map out the goals of the book: to demonstrate how and why the world has been dominated by a way of thinking that is reductively analytical—and that we are now moving into an age that values creativity, empathy, and narrative. These two divergent ways of thinking are essentially derived from the concept of being left- or right-brained. Our brains are split; the left hemisphere is “sequential, logical, and analytical” while the right hemisphere is “nonlinear, intuitive, and holistic” (3). Although humans engage both sides of their brains for even the smallest tasks, we’ve come to understand the hemispheres as indicative of separate identities. Pink endeavors to prove that this is no longer the case throughout the length of this book, beginning with contextualizing the differences through examples, defining the origin of the thinking hierarchy, and using left-brained analytics to evince that right-brained thinking is now the leading force in the world.    

Chapter 1 Summary: “Right Brain Rising”

Pink has his brain scanned, taking in the prominent line that divides his right and left hemisphere. He notes that the halves look exactly the same despite having such different functions. During the scan, Pink is shown a series of images, and the fMRI shows which side of his brain is engaged; for images showing facial expressions, his right hemisphere responds, but for an image of a man wielding a gun, his left hemisphere jumps into action.

The human brain is incredibly complex. Despite that complexity, scientists have long surmised the two halves simply as “separate but unequal” (13). The left hemisphere was understood as the essential half—“the half that made us human” (13). This theory reigned until Roger W. Sperry argues that the “so-called subordinate or minor hemisphere” is actually superior when it comes to specific tasks (14). While the left brain excels at analysis, the right hemisphere recognizes patterns and interprets emotions and facial expressions. His 1950s study proves that the hemispheres are equally important.

Pink then lays out the four key differences between the brain’s hemispheres. The first is that the human brain is contralateral: The left hemisphere controls the right side of the body, and vice versa. Secondly, the left hemisphere is sequential while the right hemisphere is simultaneous—that is, the left must move through information logically and in order, but the right can interpret many things at once. The third difference is that the left works with text and the right works with context. For example, the left can decipher language, but the right understands body language and tone. Together, they create a complete image. The fourth and final difference is that the left picks up on details and the right sees the big picture. 

In wrapping up the chapter, Pink reiterates some of the information he’s presented to demonstrate that the differences between the two hemispheres are in fact not inequalities. Rather, they are meant to be used equally, and the result of equal use and recognition is cerebral and societal balance. 

Chapter 2 Summary: “Abundance, Asia, and Automation”

This chapter explores the three major catalysts for the shift away from L-Directed Thinking. First, Pink argues that L-Directed Thinking has molded how individuals moves through American society with the use of standardized tests (the SAT, LSAT, etc.). The tests operate with L-Directed logic while requiring L-Directed Thinking processes of its takers. Although L-Directed Thinking is still important, R-Directed Thinking is becoming more pressing because of forces like “Abundance, Asia, and Automation” (30).

L-Directed Thinking fostered a competitive, consumer-driven economy that has now resulted in abundance. The irony, though, is that the very abundance of products has decreased the significance of those products. Now, Pink argues, “less rational” sensibilities like “beauty, spirituality, emotion” are more pressing (33). Engineers and creators must appeal to aesthetics while also appealing to logical and functional needs.

Pink argues that Asia is transforming the world through innovation in design and technology. The continent is also changing the American approach to business through outsourcing. While in India, Pink meets four computer coders who each make about $15,000/year coding for North American banks and airlines. Their US counterparts would be making about $70,000/year. Outsourcing has caused a lot of anxiety for Americans, but Pink claims that this anxiety outstrips the current reality; it is not going to result in Americans losing their jobs immediately. However, he does believe that as international communicating costs drop, it will eventually become a greater issue. The only solution, Pink says, is for Americans to do what workers abroad cannot offer for cheaper: “using R-Directed abilities such as forging relationships rather than executing transactions” (39-40).

Automation is the final major catalyst for the transition towards right-dominated thinking. In an age when a computer can work faster than the human mind, R-Directed Thinking is the only chance for humans to attempt to outperform technology. Although computers can create, analyze, and even play chess, they cannot offer empathy or recognize context the way the right hemisphere can. L-Directed professionals must develop R-Directed sensibilities to overcome the impending crisis automation presents to the workforce.  

Introduction-Chapter 2 Analysis

The Introduction sets up the goals of the text. Pink is defining the lessons he expects readers to take with them upon finishing the book. Pink’s technical approach involves personalizing the narrative with anecdotes from his life and supporting his argument with scientific studies conducted by prominent thinkers in their fields. The first-person narrative eases the reader into some of the heavier notions—he first tells a story that demonstrates how his brain works, and he then supports this claim with scientific facts.

Pink uses a meta approach to writing this book: The very abilities and qualities he argues will shape the future are seen in his style and execution. A Whole New Mind first presents an overview of ideas in Chapter 1 and then uses data to argue the merit of those ideas in Chapter 2. In this way, Pink demonstrates the value of using both hemispheres. The left-brained approach involves presenting the reader with research, sequentially using logic to overwhelm readers with information that is more difficult to challenge. His right-brained approach deals more with the big picture by offering metaphors for how the human brain represents “the contours of our times” (3). Thus, the Introduction subtly conveys one of the text’s most important themes just through its stylistic approach: balance. Though Pink is making a case for why society should value the right hemisphere just as much as the left, he ultimately portrays the necessity of cerebral and societal balance; just as the two hemispheres work to complement each other, the qualities attributed to right- and left-brained thinkers must be embraced as two halves of one whole rather than two opposite and unrelated parts.

Chapter 1 more directly addresses the importance of balance in the text as Pink lays out the physicality and function of each hemisphere. Describing what exactly his brain looks like—an image most people are familiar with—is an important image for him to convey; he wants readers to think about the physical divide that has informed the conceptual divide. The series of images he presents, those that he saw while undergoing the fMRI, also serve to highlight readers’ own emotional responses. By moving through the process of his experiment with the fMRI, he breaks down just how the brain works; the feelings readers experience as they process an image can be tied to a specific function of one of the brain’s hemispheres.

Chapter 1 also introduces the thematic significance Pink places on defining humanity. The text seeks to make sense of human behavior through both biological and cultural phenomena. Science’s previously held belief that the left hemisphere was solely responsible for the traits that elevate humans above beasts is a result of both—biological in the sense that the left brain is responsible for distinctly humanizing traits (such as language), and cultural in the sense that this prominent theory has neglected the right-brain traits that are also humanizing (such as empathy) and therefore informed cultural bias towards socially esteemed qualities. Pink’s surveying of the history of scientific thought on this subject shows that the preoccupation with which hemisphere is superior is really about the need to understand and define what exactly it means to be human. These themes subscribe to the ideals of the Conceptual Age; as Pink describes the differences between the two hemispheres and their cultural reception, he emphasizes the importance of each rather than working toward the superiority of one. Chapter 1, then, works to anticipate the issues that could appear as he advocates for R-Directed Thinking by stressing how the two hemispheres complement one another—how neither is superior because utilizing the entire brain is the goal.

Chapter 2 introduces the third theme of the text: society’s devaluation of emotionally centered qualities in favor of what have been seen as more marketable traits. Pink argues that Abundance, Asia, and Automation exclusively valued L-Directed Thinking and, ironically, this led to a decrease in the valuing of left-brained traits. This chapter draws a line between Pink’s understanding of knowledge and skill workers and the conceptually driven individuals Pink figures as the pioneers of the new age. The chapter, however, ignores the problematics of the Abundance, Asia, and Automation issues that Pink presents; all three were caused by a highly competitive market that relies upon the exploitation of workers to cut costs and increase profit. The subtext of this chapter is that this economic atmosphere led to the depreciation of emotionally intuitive skills and that workers must adjust to the now-shifting landscape, which will support those once-undervalued skills. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text