72 pages • 2 hours read
AnonymousA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The first epistle of John was, according to tradition, written by John the disciple. The text of the epistle does not name an author, but its content suggests that it was written by an eyewitness of Jesus’s ministry (1 John 1:1), and its style closely matches the Gospel of John. By the end of his life, John was thought to have emigrated to the Christian communities of western Asia Minor (near Ephesus), so this epistle is usually assumed to be directed at local conditions in that area. It is written to a community of Christians who have evidently undergone a painful split; some people whom they thought had been part of their group had gone over to false teachers instead (1 John 2:19). Many scholars think that the false teaching in question may have been an early form of the heresy of Docetism, which taught that Jesus was a spirit without a corporeal body and only appeared to be crucified and die on the cross. By contrast, John insists on the physical nature of Jesus’s body: “By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God” (1 John 4:2). John describes those who do not adhere to this doctrine as “antichrists.”
John encourages the church not to doubt or despair, despite the difficult circumstances in their congregational life. He gives them several hallmarks for what real faith looks like so that they can remain assured that they are following the true form of the gospel (good news of Jesus). Among those hallmarks are a belief in the incarnation of Jesus Christ, a consistent pattern of walking in holiness rather than sin, the active presence of the Holy Spirit, and a union with one another based on love. John insists on the centrality of love, grounding it as the definition of the nature of God: “God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him” (1 John 4:16). As such, the heart of Christian practice comes down to the command that Jesus gave his disciples, that they should love one another (1 John 3:11; compare with John 15:12).
The epistle of 2 John is one of the shortest books of the Bible, amounting to just 13 verses. The author of this letter, traditionally considered to be John, identifies himself simply as “the elder” (as also in 3 John). He writes the letter to “the elect lady and her children” (2 John 1). The meaning of this form of address is debated, but one of the leading explanations is that John is using “elect lady” as a metaphor to refer to a particular local church, with the children being the members of that church (2 John 13). The letter touches briefly on themes that were also present in the epistle of 1 John: a warning against those who do not acknowledge Jesus as having come in the flesh, a categorization of such people as “antichrists,” a central focus on loving each other as the main hallmark of Christian practice, and the importance of abiding in Christ and showing love for him by following his commandments: “[…] love one another. And this is love, that we walk according to his commandments […]” (2 John 5-6; compare with John 15:10; 1 John 5:3).
Third John is similar to 2 John, a very short letter—just 15 verses—from “the elder,” once again assumed by tradition to be John the disciple. This letter is written to a particular person named Gaius. The occasion for the epistle seems to be as a letter of recommendation for a man called Demetrius (3 John 12) and to encourage Gaius to show hospitality for ministry workers who are traveling through the area: “You would do well to send them on their journey in a manner worthy of God. For they have gone out for the sake of the name” (3 John 6-7). The church with which Gaius was involved had been dealing with some discord. John mentions a man named Diotrephes, who apparently had been exercising a problematic form of leadership by acting selfishly, not recognizing apostolic authority of others, and not practicing hospitality to other Christians who were traveling through. Third John, then, offers a brief but important picture of the way that the dispersed Christian community maintained its contacts, often by upholding hospitality as a primary virtue.
Jude closes out the section of general epistles, and, like the preceding two letters, it is relatively short, with just 25 verses. The author of the epistle identifies himself as “Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James” (Jude 1), which would make him a part of Jesus’s family (like James, he would be an adelphos of Jesus, variously interpreted as a half-brother, step-brother, or cousin). Some critical scholars doubt the traditional attribution and assume that the epistle is a later pseudonymous work, so one can find dating estimates for the book that run from the mid-first century through the early second century CE.
Much of Jude’s content resembles sections of 2 Peter, but most scholars assume Jude to have been the primary source for this material. Unusual for a New Testament book, it makes direct reference to noncanonical sources, including the pseudepigraphal (“wrongly attributed”) books of 1 Enoch and the Testament of Moses. Jude offers several stern warnings against false teachers, particularly stressing the dangers involved in groups who have given themselves over to sensuality or to speculative theologies concerning angels and spiritual powers. His rhetoric against such false teachers is harsh, but for Christians who have been led astray he adopts a gentler tone, encouraging believers to “have mercy on those who doubt” (Jude 22) and to make efforts to save them from falling into heresy. He closes his epistle with a doxology that is one of the most majestic and articulate prayers of the New Testament: “[…] to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen” (Jude 25).
The second set of general epistles includes one letter of medium length (1 John) and then three of the shortest pieces in the New Testament. Their literary form shows that the early Christian community made frequent use of correspondence between churches and leaders, with these epistles being the size of a simple parchment letter (as opposed to a scroll). While the authorship attributions of these epistles are debated by scholars, the mere fact of the preservation of such short letters, some of which deal with localized circumstances (such as 2 and 3 John), suggests that the early Christian Church recognized the apostolic authority of their writers from the beginning.
The epistles of John and Jude offer a valuable historical window into some of the social conditions of early Christianity in Asia Minor. Third John, for example, illustrates the primary importance of the virtue of hospitality. Showing hospitality to traveling Christians not only fulfilled their needs in a practical way but also strengthened the bonds between believers who followed apostolic teachings and acted as a buffer against those who were pursuing heretical teachings. The development of heresy is a major feature of these texts, which appear to show the rise of movements that differed from the ones Paul faced during his missionary journeys. Whereas the positions Paul stood against were largely concerned with matters of the Old Testament law, the ones facing John and Jude are marked by other issues.
First John addresses a situation concerning The Identity of Jesus. Certain people had broken off from a Christian Church, teaching that Jesus did not have true physical flesh (which would make it an early form of Docetism, a heresy rooted in Greek philosophical perspectives on the gospel). Jude, for his part, appears concerned with sects that are promoting sensuality and speculative angelology. It is Jude’s response to this challenge that sets a pattern for Christian teachers of the following generations to stand against the rise of theological novelties. Jude places his emphasis on “the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3). He means that being able to trace the transmission of the original Christian doctrines to the apostles themselves is the guide to the trustworthiness of any doctrinal position. This principle would become foundational to the idea of apostolic succession, which helped shape the form and function of the Christian Church through much of its early history.
The theme of Jesus’s identity also looms large in these epistles, and especially in 1 John. John insists that an inextricable part of Jesus’s identity was his incarnation in a real human body. This insistence would play a major role in the later articulation of Christian doctrine, which drew on New Testament texts such as 1 John to argue that Jesus was both fully man and fully God. If he did not have a real human body as part of his human nature, later Christian teachers would argue that Christians cannot be fully saved. Jesus must represent every part of human nature, including its bodily physicality, because he assumed human nature in every respect so that he could save it in every respect. The perspective on Jesus’s identity that is revealed in the classic Christian creeds is rooted in expressions of Christology (study of Jesus’s person, nature, and role), which began in texts like 1 John.
By Anonymous