60 pages • 2 hours read
James L. SwansonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In the Prologue, Swanson details the first assassination attempt on Martin Luther King. In 1958, King published a memoir called Stride Toward Freedom about his involvement in the Montgomery, Alabama, bus boycott. In Alabama, Black people had to sit at the back of the bus and give their seats up to white people if the bus got full. To protest this inequality, King led a boycott of the city’s buses, with Black people refusing to ride the bus until the law changed.
King’s involvement in the Montgomery bus boycott made him famous in the civil rights movement, and New York City was the first stop on his book tour. Several events were organized for King, including a rally in front of a hotel in Harlem. Many people were excited to see King speak, but a small group of protesters were angry that King would sign books at a white-owned bookstore instead of one owned by Black people. These protesters were peaceful and respectful, but another attendee loudly “heckled” the white people speaking, saying that she “wanted nothing to do with anyone or anything white” (13).
Unbothered, King gave the crowd a message of love, telling them not to hate white people. This statement made the woman angrier, and some people suggested that King should have a bodyguard for his other events. King refused, and on September 20, 1958, he attended his book signing at Blumstein’s department store. He took photos and signed books, but toward the end of the event, a woman cut to the front of the line. It was Izola Ware Curry, the angry woman from the rally at the hotel. Curry had a pistol hidden in her bra, but instead of shooting King, she reached for a letter opener hidden in her handbag.
She shouted that King had “made enough people suffer” (17) and lashed out, slashing his hand with the letter opener before burying the weapon in his chest. The letter opener broke through his breastbone, situated “so close to King’s aorta that any sudden expansion of his chest” (21) would have killed him. Onlookers were shocked. Curry was detained, shouting that she had “been after [King] for years” (19) and was glad to have killed him. King was rushed to the hospital. He had surgery and woke a few hours later.
Some people worried that Curry tried to kill King as part of a conspiracy with white racists. Such rumors were dangerous because racial tensions were high in the country, and many feared a “race war” would break out. However, Curry was soon declared “mentally disturbed” and placed in a psychiatric hospital. King said that he wasn’t angry and hoped Curry wouldn’t be punished. After being released from Harlem Hospital on October 3, King recovered fully.
Swanson reflects on what would have happened if King had been killed in 1958, writing, “It is amazing how the actions of one anonymous person can change the future of […] an entire nation” (24). If King had died, there would have been a great “void,” and many things might have gone “undone” or differently. King survived, but the assassination attempt made him a different man, one more aware of the risks that “he must make his peace with if he chose to continue to lead the civil rights movement” (24). His scars made the shape of a cross over his heart, and King came out of his surgery more committed to his message of non-violence than ever. However, he had no idea of the great future awaiting him; he didn’t know that he would become the “beloved living, breathing symbol” (25) of the civil rights movement.
Swanson describes the Jim Crow South in which King was born. King was born in Atlanta, Georgia, on January 15, 1929. The Civil War resulted in the abolition of slavery in 1865; however, life was still hard for Black people in the United States. In the South, so-called “Jim Crow laws” ensured that Black people were not treated equally. These laws were based “on the white supremacist belief that blacks were an inferior race” (27). Black people and white people could not live in the same neighborhoods, go to the same schools, or drink from the same water fountains. Black voters were also suppressed, meaning that politicians across the South were white.
White racists controlled Black people’s lives not only through Jim Crow laws, but also with violence. The Ku Klux Klan, a “racist terrorist organization” that operated throughout the South, was responsible for countless “horrific and senseless assaults” (29). Law enforcement did nothing to stop these attacks, and some police officers were even members of the Klan themselves. Across the country, many Black people were lynched, often just to “create fear and reinforce white supremacy” (29).
Segregation also meant that many Black people remained poor. They lacked access to good jobs and education, so “there was no clear path to get ahead” (29). Swanson describes Abraham Lincoln calling slavery “a hopeless prison in which blacks were jailed behind a cell door locked with one hundred keys, making it impossible ever to escape” (29-30). Even though slavery had been abolished, Black people remained in a similar position. King was born into this world, which was ready for a change.
Growing up, King was “a member of the black elite” (31). His father, grandfather, and great-grandfather were all pastors, and “[r]eligion was a natural and important part” (31) of the young boy’s life. King was an intelligent and curious child. The family was comfortable, as his father could ensure the family had everything they needed.
When King was still a boy, his mother tried to explain to him the racism he would find outside of their neighborhood. It was a conversation that King would always remember. She told him about the history of slavery and the current reality of segregation, but insisted that these “racist practices” should never make her son “feel inferior” (33). King’s early experiences with racism and segregation had a profound impact on him. He often felt angry, but his parents always reminded him not to hate white people.
Before King began college, he worked on a tobacco farm in Connecticut. In the North, King was treated the same as the young white men he worked with. He could eat in restaurants and choose his seat on the bus. These experiences were a revelation for King. However, returning to the racism of the South made him feel depressed.
At 15 years old, King enrolled at Morehouse College. He read the essay “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau and was “deeply moved” by the idea of nonviolent resistance. In 1948, at just 19 years old, King was ordained as a minister at his father’s church, Ebenezer Baptist in Atlanta. He graduated from Morehouse and enrolled in Crozer Theological Seminary as a theology student. There, he heard a speech by Dr. Mordecai Johnson, the president of Howard University, who spoke about Mohandas Gandhi and his nonviolent resistance to colonial Britain.
In 1951, King enrolled in Boston University’s School of Theology. The following year, he met Coretta Scott, a beautiful young woman who studied music and wanted to become a concert singer. The two were married in 1953, and Coretta gave up her “dreams of travel and a glamorous career” (35) to become a preacher’s wife. King became the pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama, in 1954, and earned his doctorate degree in theology the following year. He and Coretta welcomed their first child, and King settled in for a “quiet life as a minister, husband, father, and respected local community leader” (36). However, life had other plans for him.
On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks was riding a Montgomery bus and refused to give her seat up to a white passenger. She was arrested, and Black community leaders saw an opportunity. They founded the Montgomery Improvement Association and elected King as the leader. They decided that Black people would stop using the bus if they could not expect equal treatment. The MIA organized carpools, and many Black people began walking to work. The bus company began to suffer without money from Black people’s fares.
King faced violent repercussions from segregationists, some of whom bombed his home while he was at a meeting. No one was harmed, but King began to understand the danger to himself and his family. The boycott lasted for almost an entire year until the Supreme Court finally ruled that segregation on buses was unconstitutional.
King’s involvement in the boycott made him famous. He appeared on the cover of Time magazine and was invited to speak at an event in Washington, DC. He was also elected president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. His career was nearly derailed when he was stabbed by Izola Curry in 1958. At this moment, King could not ignore the danger his work put him in. However, instead of abandoning the fight, he “chose to recommit himself to the civil rights movement” (42).
King was attempting to undo racist systems that had been in place for more than 350 years. This was a huge task. King was in the international spotlight and already considered the “spokesman and the symbol” (43) of the civil rights movement. However, he needed help from many others to reach his goals of changing the law and public opinion about segregation. King formed a group of people and organizations to help.
His approach had two main areas of focus. The first was “peaceful, nonviolent but relentless” protests and demonstrations (43). This would generate publicity that King hoped would win them more support and “shame” those who opposed the movement. His second focus was on the law. King hoped he could overturn unjust, racist laws and create new ones that protected the rights of Black people.
In 1959, King went to India, where he met with leaders and learned about Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolent protest. One year later, in 1960, the first “sit-in” took place in Greensboro, North Carolina. These nonviolent demonstrations soon spread across the South. Black people sat at lunch counters that were meant only for white people and asked for service. When they were refused, the protesters refused to leave. Many people were arrested, including King, who was jailed in an attempt to “teach him a lesson” (46). After several days in jail, then-presidential candidate John F. Kennedy helped free him, a move many think led to Kennedy’s narrow presidential win a few weeks later.
In 1961, the Freedom Rider movement began when 13 demonstrators boarded a bus from Washington, DC, to New Orleans to protest public bus segregation. Even though the Supreme Court had ruled this practice unconstitutional, no one enforced this new law. The Freedom Riders were frequently attacked and beaten by mobs of white racists, indicating “the culture of rising violence that Martin Luther King, Jr., faced” (47).
In 1962, James Meredith became the first Black student to attend the University of Mississippi. This was a huge victory for the civil rights movement, but “behind each victory, there remained the threat of violence” (49). Meredith had to be escorted around campus by federal troops to protect him from the rioting mobs of white segregationists.
Chasing King’s Killer opens with a Prologue introducing many of the text’s main themes. By starting the narrative with the first attempt on King’s life, Swanson illustrates the tensions between Violence and Nonviolence in the Fight Against Injustice. Even 10 years before his assassination, King faced threats to his life. This theme will continue to develop throughout the text as King faces personal violence, and his followers are consistently met with brutality in their opposition to unjust systems.
In the first chapters of Chasing King’s Killer, Swanson explains the history of slavery, racism, and segregation in the United States to illustrate the world that King was born into and the great need for the civil rights movement. As Swanson discusses King’s childhood, he reveals how the young man built his concepts of justice and nonviolence. King was heavily impacted by his early experiences with racism, but his family constantly instilled values of self-worth and nonviolence. This early influence, combined with his childhood intelligence and curiosity, would turn King into a great leader.
The early chapters also introduce the violence surrounding the civil rights movement. Swanson explains how violence was deeply engrained in systems of slavery and, later, the segregated South. Segregation laws were enforced mainly through violence or the threat of violence, and Black people were often subject to lynchings and other terrible crimes. Fighting this system was dangerous, and white supremacists responded with the violence they were accustomed to. Swanson describes how every victory of the civil rights movement was accompanied by “the threat of violence” (49), and that even when they achieved great things, civil rights activists suffered violent repercussions. Faced with this violent system, King’s method of nonviolence was all the more revolutionary. However, it also made him a controversial figure among both Black and white people, as some in the civil rights movement believed that Black people should fight back against the oppression they experienced.
The Prologue also introduces the theme of Repercussions and Twists of Fate. Swanson often points out tiny, seemingly inconsequential moments that go on to have great repercussions. He repeatedly wonders how American lives might be different today if these moments had gone differently. The first such example is the proximity of the letter opener to King’s aorta. Something as inconsequential as a sneeze could have killed him and changed the course of history forever. Likewise, Curry was “one anonymous person,” yet she almost changed “the future of […] an entire nation” (24). Sometimes, Swanson suggests, the things we least expect can have the biggest impact.
Finally, the Prologue and first chapters introduce the theme of The Impact of King’s Life and Death. If King had died on September 20, 1958, Swanson argues that there would have been “a void” in American history. King impacted American history so much that the country could look completely different today without his influence. Many of the things achieved by the civil rights movement are remnants of King’s legacy. However, Swanson also points out that the assassination attempt “changed” King, reinforcing a “sense of fatalism” and opening his eyes to “the dangers, risks, and uncertainty that he must make his peace with if he chose to continue to lead the civil rights movement” (24). Therefore, it is possible that King became the great leader he was in part because of this near-death experience.
By James L. Swanson