logo

39 pages 1 hour read

David Harry Walker

David Walker's Appeal

Nonfiction | Essay / Speech | Adult | Published in 1995

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Article 1Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Article 1 Summary: “Our Wretchedness in Consequence of Slavery”

Walker begins the first article by arguing that enslaved African Americans are the only oppressed people in the history of the world who have been denied the title of “men” and considered instead to be “brutes.” Even though the United States claims to be an “enlightened and Christian” nation, it treats these enslaved people far worse than any other example of oppressed peoples throughout the “heathen” world. This reality is so clear to “unprejudiced men” that Walker claims there is no need to prove it. However, he endeavors to offer the example of the enslaved Israelites in Egypt. He tells the story of Joseph, the son of Jacob, who was granted a place of prestige ruling the Egyptians under the Pharaoh’s command despite being a child of Israel. Walker points out that, in the United States, no Black man holds even the lowest public office. He recalls how the Pharaoh gave Joseph a new name and the daughter of a priest to marry. In the United States, on the other hand, laws prevent white people and Black people from marrying. Next, the Pharaoh gave Joesph the best land in Egypt to dwell in with his family. Meanwhile, Walker recounts a story about a poor Black man in the United States who finally saved enough to buy a small piece of land but was “cheated out of his property” (22) by a white man. Most importantly, Walker claims that there isn’t a single shred of historical proof to suggest that the Egyptians “heaped the insupportable insult upon the children of Israel by telling them that they were not of the human family” (23), of which white Americans are certainly guilty. On the contrary, the Egyptian Pharaoh’s daughter raised the baby Moses as her own son, and he would have ruled all of Egypt if he hadn’t chosen to be with his own people.

Walker celebrates Moses for choosing “shame, with the people of God” (25) over the pleasure and comfort that the Egyptians offered and wishes more African Americans would follow this example. He believes it is a mistake to “[court] favor” among white Americans and argues that this perpetuates Black oppression. In a brief addition, Walker reminds African Americans to remain “humble” before Jesus Christ and only attempt to gain freedom when the way is “clear.” He insists that God is just and made African Americans black “because it pleased him” (25). While some white Americans, including Thomas Jefferson, believe that being Black is “unfortunate” and that all those with dark skin must wish to be white, Walker argues that they “wish to be just as it pleased [their] Creator to have made [them]” (25). They need not be afraid because God is “on [their] side,” and any man who does not fight for his freedom deserves to remain enslaved.

Walker goes on to discuss the comedy of American “Southerners and Westerners” talking about “barbarity.” He recounts a newspaper that complained of the Turks treating the Greeks “like brutes” next to an advertisement for enslaved African Americans. He then moves on to the suffering of enslaved Helots under the Spartans, which he calls “somewhat severe.” However, Spartans were “heathens,” so their crimes still cannot be compared to those of “Christian Americans.” Furthermore, the Helots and their children were punished with enslavement after creating “an intestine commotion” in Sparta. While this is a “frivolous pretext,” white Americans have no reason at all for enslaving Black people.

Walker then turns to slavery in Rome. He reminds his readers that many enslaved Black people are talented and intelligent, but few have had the chance to develop their abilities due to the oppression they experience. On the subject, he turns to the remarks of Thomas Jefferson, who argued that those whom the Romans enslaved, who were often great teachers or artists, were nevertheless white, suggesting that their intellect was not related to their “condition” but rather to their “nature.” Walker illustrates how this argument has been “swallowed” by white Americans and reflected in how they treat enslaved Black people. He argues that his “brethren” must challenge these arguments; otherwise, they “will only establish them” (30).

To close Article 1, Walker argues that the United States is growing thanks to the labor of enslaved African Americans. He claims that Jesus Christ is their one and only “master,” and they have no “right” to refer to anyone else as such. He cannot imagine how African Americans remain “so submissive” to white men, who “have always been an unjust, jealous unmerciful, avaricious and bloodthirsty set of beings” (32). Over and over throughout history, Walker argues that white men have illustrated a propensity toward violence, deceit, and mercilessness unmatched by people of other races. In light of their Christianity, the cruelty of white Americans becomes even more remarkable. Even the heathens of Europe were not guilty of the “hellish cruelties” that white Christians in the United States inflicted on their enslaved people. If possible, Walker suspects that white Americans would not hesitate to “dethrone Jehovah and seat themselves on his throne” and wonders if they are “as good by nature as we [Black people] are or not” (33).

Article 1 Analysis

Article 1 focuses on the uniquely degrading and dehumanizing aspects of American slavery and the hypocrisy of such a cruel system existing in a Christian nation. This Article details the foundational arguments of Walker’s Appeal as he details the “wretchedness” that slavery has brought to African Americans. In particular, he illustrates how the systematic dehumanization of enslaved people that takes place in the United States is unprecedented. Never in recorded history has an oppressed group been denied the title of “men.”

The majority of Walker’s argument consists of comparing American slavery to other forms of slavery around the world and across history. He especially lingers on the Biblical story of the enslavement of the Israelites under the Egyptians and the rights and privileges that were granted to Joseph, the son of Jacob, even though his people were enslaved. Walker uses Biblical stories and religious rhetoric to illustrate the hypocrisy of white Christian enslavers. Not only does the Bible fail to condone slavery, but it also tells stories of oppressed peoples rising up and overcoming their oppression. He also discusses how other nations that practiced slavery generally allowed enslaved people to earn their freedom at some point and then participate fully in society. Additionally, there was generally some cause for enslavement, such as punishment for some past wrongdoing. None of this is true in the case of American slavery, which operates with unjustifiable cruelty.

This cruelty is made all the more unbearable by the claim to being a democratic Christian nation. Walker describes contradictions that are “funny […] enough to make a man smile” (26), such as seeing a newspaper lamenting the “barbarity” of the Turks on one page while advertising enslaved African Americans for sale on the other. In this comparison, Walker illustrates how white Americans attempt to distract from their own “barbarity” by pointing out that of other nations. However, this only further underscores their hypocrisy. Citing Jefferson’s comments about the inferiority of Black people also suggests how the United States’s founding principles of freedom and equality were hypocritical from the start.

Walker is unflinching in discussing his disdain for white Americans, even suggesting that they are naturally inclined to barbarism, cruelty, and oppression. He argues that the “hellish cruelties” perpetuated by white Christians in the United States are unmatched even by European heathens of antiquity. This is an interesting twist on white American’s attempt to justify slavery by referring to the supposed natural inclinations of Black people. In light of this assessment, Walker expressly does not advocate for greater integration of Black people into white society. This, he warns, would only strengthen Black oppression, and he calls instead for Black pride and independence while remaining humble before God. Creating a parallel between the Israelites and African Americans, Walker celebrates Moses, who chose to leave Egypt with his people instead of living with the royal Egyptian family, and suggests that more African Americans should likewise reject “enjoy[ing] pleasures with […] wicked people for a season” (24).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text