54 pages • 1 hour read
Edwin A. AbbottA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Edwin A. Abbott was born in London in 1838. The son of a headmaster, Abbott was highly educated, attending the elite City of London School and St. John’s College, Cambridge. He was known as a brilliant scholar, achieving high marks in classics, mathematics, and theology, and became headmaster of his alma mater, the City of London School, at the age of 26. In 1876, he received a Hulsean Lectureship at Cambridge, a prestigious position that provides Cambridge graduates with the opportunity to lecture on any branch of Christian theology. Abbott retired from teaching in 1889 to devote himself entirely to his independent intellectual pursuits. He died in Hampstead, London, in 1926.
By the time Flatland was published in 1884, Abbott had been writing on a wide variety of topics for many years. In 1870, he wrote a textbook on Shakespearean grammar, which remains important to the study of Shakespearean language to this day. He also wrote a biography of Englishman Francis Bacon (1561-1626), an influential scientist, philosopher, and politician often considered the father of empiricism. In an attempt to interest readers in the Gospels, he wrote and anonymously published three texts known as “theological romances” in 1878, 1882, and 1908. In these texts, Abbott uses fictional narratives to explore what life might have been like for people living in the early Christian world; for example, in Philocristus (1878), the fictional character Philocristus details his personal spiritual evolution and eventual identity as a disciple of Jesus. But Abbott’s religious orientation is perhaps best summarized in The Kernel and the Husk (1886), an epistolary text in which Abbott addresses a hypothetical skeptic by laying out his own program of liberal Christianity and exploring the relationship between spirituality and the natural world.
In literature, satire refers to texts that use humor to criticize human faults or foibles. Satire is typically referred to as a literary mode rather than a specific genre or style of writing; the term mode designates a broad but unspecified mood or method of writing (other examples include the comic mode or the ironic mode). All satiric literature, regardless of genre, is comprised of two basic elements: criticism and humor. However, these two elements are not always equally balanced, and different “balances” are rooted in different literary satiric traditions. Satire that is harsher or angrier in its tone is called Juvenalian satire, after the Roman poet Juvenal, and satire that is more comic and lighthearted in tone is called Horatian satire, after the Roman poet Horace. Satire that mixes different genres and styles and attacks general mental attitudes rather than individual people is often referred to as Menippean satire, after the Greek Cynic and satirist Menippus. For much of classical, medieval, and early modern literary history, satire was considered a mode that could only be properly expressed through poetry: acceptable verse forms for satiric poetry included Latin hexameter, Italian terza rima, and the English heroic couplet. But by the 18th century, English writers were beginning to create lengthy satirical prose texts—like Henry Fielding’s The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling (1749) and Lawrence Sterne’s The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman (1759)—that were extremely popular with readers and ultimately proved highly influential for 19th- and 20th-century novelists. Indeed, scholars often consider the 18th century in England to be a golden age of satire.
However, both narrative satire and visual satire persisted well into the 19th century, albeit in response to a very different cultural and social landscape than writers like Fielding and Sterne so enthusiastically mocked. Perhaps the most notable formal shift is that Victorian satire endeavored to be more polite than the more vicious Augustan satire of the previous century: its critiques of controversial social issues and corrupt political leaders were gentler, more respectable, and tended to focus on the corrective to the problems they explored rather than the problems themselves. To be popular, Victorian satires had to appeal to an expanded, largely middle-class readership, which meant they were generally less violent and did not use humor about sex or bodily functions. While a crucial feature of the genre is its attention to the deviant, perverse, or unusual, late 19th-century satire attempted to strike a moderate position in its critique: It might mock one cultural, philosophical, or political extreme, but it would also mock the other extreme, implying that the middle ground between the two is the ideal position or situation. Ultimately, satirical novels like Flatland might offer very clear criticisms of the brutal Victorian class system, the ruthless expansion of the British Empire, and the coldness of empiricism and rationalism, but they take great pains to emphasize that the corrective to these problems is not located at the other extreme, but rather somewhere in between the two poles.
British Literature
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Feminist Reads
View Collection
Nature Versus Nurture
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Satire
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Victorian Literature
View Collection
Victorian Literature / Period
View Collection