logo

73 pages 2 hours read

Gitta Sereny

Into That Darkness: An Examination of Conscience

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 1974

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3, Chapters 9-17Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3, Chapter 9 Summary

Treblinka entered its third phase in January 1943. Increasingly fewer transports arrived, meaning the Jewish workers began to starve because for the first time they had to rely on their meager camp rations. They began planning a revolt. An SS guard intuited this and sent a crucial member of the planning committee—Zhelo Bloch—to work in the extermination section, effectively a death sentence. This devastated morale among the prisoners, and their strong emotional reactions to Bloch’s punishment made it clear that the guards’ actions and life at the camp were taking a huge toll on them.

By February, the transports stopped completely, save one of a few hundred Roma. Suddenly, the storehouses that had been full of plundered goods were empty. As Glazar recounts, the working prisoners began fearing for their lives: If there were no goods to process, the guards had no reason to keep them alive. The transports resumed in late March, and Glazar is ashamed that he and the other workers cheered when they learned of this. For them, others’ deaths meant staying alive.

The first of the resumed transports was of 24,000 rich, Bulgarian Jews, each of whom had been allowed to bring 50kg of possessions. Upon seeing them, one SS guard said, “Ah yes, you can see they are rich. But they won’t burn well, they are too fat” (586). The camp was terribly efficient: The guards killed and burned those 24,000 people within three days, and the workers processed their 720,000kg of possessions in 10 days. Glazar estimates the Nazis could have murdered 6 million Jews in Treblinka alone; the limiting factor was the trains, which the military needed for the war: “Given adequate rail transport, the German extermination camps in Poland could have killed all the Poles, Russians and other East Europeans the Nazis planned eventually to kill” (590).

Part 3, Chapter 10 Summary

The Allied Nations didn’t do as much as they could have to save Jewish refugees. Both Britain and the US closed their borders to Jewish refugees. In one case, Britain refused a boat of Jewish refugees, which then sank, killing all 769 onboard. The US accepted 10,000 English children without visas after Germany took France, making Britain the only Allied nation left in Europe; by contrast, the US stalled for over five months on a similar program for Jewish children, waiting until it was no longer possible to save those children. Even more so than Britain, the US did not want to be seen as “fighting a war for the Jews” (601). Switzerland refused or expelled tens of thousands of refugees because they were Jewish.

There were some successes in saving Jewish refugees. Throughout the war, Sweden, upon whom Germany relied for steel, leveraged that position to provide a safe haven for over 42,000 Jewish refugees. In 1944, the American War Refugee Board persuaded Romania that since the war was lost, they should return 48,000 Jews to their homes. However, there was almost no escape for Jews in German-occupied territory from 1942-43, especially in the east.

Part 3, Chapter 11 Summary

By April 1943, the transports to Treblinka abated again, leaving the Jewish workers starving. They continued planning their revolt. Glazar, assigned by the SS to collect branches outside the camp to camouflage the fences, smuggled food back into the camp to keep those planning the revolt strong. By this point, plentiful food no longer came on the transports.

During this time, the guards developed a new method for burning corpses. They ordered the construction of two giant iron racks—called “the roasts”—out of train rails that were capable of burning hundreds of bodies at once. The SS became increasingly anxious about hiding what they were doing as the Russians advanced.

Part 3, Chapter 12 Summary

Gustav Münzberger was the SS officer in charge of Treblinka’s gas chambers and served six years in prison for his crimes. In 1972, Sereny visits him in the German town where he lives with his wife in his son’s house. His son, Horst, is appalled by his father’s crimes (his wife’s father is a known anti-Nazi) but feels obligated to give his parents a place to live. Gustav’s wife is anxious to explain that they weren’t antisemitic growing up and never saw anyone persecuting Jews. When she learned what her husband was doing, she did nothing, giving the common refrain: “It was awful of course, but what could we do?” (615). There is tension between Horst and his wife and his parents. Horst doesn’t know how he will tell his son of his grandfather’s crimes.

Growing up in Sudetenland (now a part of the Czech Republic), Horst remembers that his father was a sensitive man who worked as a middling-yet-thorough joiner. Joining the SS gave Gustav status, and he gained power when he was assigned to work in one of the euthanasia institutes. Then, he gained enormous power in his role overseeing the gas chambers: As his son says: “in Treblinka—it is inconceivable [...] what he suddenly was: the scope, the power, the uniqueness, the difference between himself and all those others—imagine […] No, it is unimaginable” (614).

Most of the 96 SS selected to work the extermination camps in Poland weren’t from Germany proper but one of its annexed states. Sereny suspects this was intentional: these men were more susceptible to pressure because they were more anxious to prove their loyalty to the Nazis than Germans. Sereny also suspects those 96 men were chosen from the ranks of the T4 personnel according to other, now lost, criteria. While most SS and German army files survived the war, the files of those 96 men disappeared.

Part 3, Chapter 13 Summary

At Treblinka, Stangl received an official commendation as the best extermination camp commander in Poland. Stangl becomes angry (one of the few times this happens during their talks) when Sereny asks him why he didn’t do his job poorly to register his protest. He snaps, “I had to do as well as I could. That is how I am” (625). He feels that any protest he might have made would’ve been insignificant; he just would’ve been replaced. He says that while he didn’t hate the Jews, he found their passivity in the face of slaughter contemptuous.

To Sereny’s disbelief, Stangl explains that money, not antisemitism, was the reason for the Holocaust, asserting that the Nazis used the money they stole from Jewish prisoners to buy their steel from Sweden. Glazar seconds Stangl’s claim that even the poorest Jews from the east brought something of value to the camps.

Stangl claims he was driven by a desire to survive Treblinka, where death was everywhere, instead of by loyalty to the Nazis. He rationalizes that only he and God know what he was responsible for and what he wasn’t: “What I did without, or against my free will, for that I need not answer” (634). In July 1943—by which time most of the killings that would occur at Treblinka had happened—Stangl went on leave to the German mountains. While there, he went to mass every day with a friend of his wife’s family, Father Mario.

Part 3, Chapter 14 Summary

During that month of leave in July 1943, Theresa became increasingly distressed by her husband’s role at Treblinka. She was glad Stangl wasn’t on the front and rationalized that they were only killing men—enemy combatants. However, she noticed an alarming change in her husband’s face: a coarseness that would sometimes protrude through his kind visage. Sereny notes that the face she describes is the same one that emerges when he talks to Sereny about Treblinka. Stangl maintained to Theresa that he wasn’t in charge—Wirth was. She begged him to try for another transfer or to escape, but he was fatalistic about those prospects.

In confession, Theresa told Father Mario about the distress regarding Stangl’s job she’d felt for a year. Father Mario summarily absolved Stangl of guilt. Theresa was distraught that he dismissed the issue so cavalierly.

Part 3, Chapter 15 Summary

The prisoners had three goals for their revolt: damage the camp beyond repair; kill the three worst of the SS, Franz, Miete, and Mentz; and escape. They revolted on August 2, 1943, without outside help and without arms except those they seized from the guards. The majority of the SS guards, including Franz, were out swimming. Stangl had a visitor and was already drunk when the revolt started. The prisoners succeeded in burning much of the camp but failed to kill the three worst SS men. Some escaped, including Glazar and Rojzman, but most were killed.

Part 3, Chapter 16 Summary

Rojzman escaped with a few other prisoners, one of whom knew a Pole with a cottage who could hide them. The man, Staszek, agreed to hide them; they built an underground shelter and stayed with him for a year. They supported themselves with money they’d brought from Treblinka and disguised themselves as Polish partisans when they went to the village to buy goods. After a year, they went to the town of Otwock, where they parted. There, Rojzman married a gentile he knew from Warsaw.

Glazar escaped with his friend to Germany, where they passed as gentiles and worked. It was surreal returning to the world. Once, a welfare service offered them coats from the very bundles assembled at Treblinka: “‘We thought we were going mad,’ Richard said” (680). Glazar credits his and the others’ escapes to the heroism of those who—having lost their families—sacrificed themselves in the revolt so some could escape. Among them was Zhelo Bloch, who survived four months working in the upper extermination camp and led the revolt.

Part 3, Chapter 17 Summary

Of the 840 Jews working in Treblinka at the time of the revolt, 105 failed to escape. Stangl called for troops, who surrounded the camp and shot all escapees they found. Stangl allowed the 105 people who remained in the camp to stay alive, explaining that the reprisals, and not the gassings, had made the prisoners hate the guards. The rebels didn’t succeed in destroying the gas chambers, which were made of brick. Globocnik didn’t punish Stangl for the revolt, as he expected, but transferred him to combat anti-partisans in Trieste—the transfer he’d long hoped for. Suchomel remembers that Stangl was overjoyed by the transfer.

According to Zabecki, the Polish partisan who worked at Treblinka station, three more transports of Polish Jews were gassed in Treblinka before the camp was closed. Under orders from higher-ups, the guards remaining after Stangl’s departure killed the remaining Jews and obliterated the camp. They planted trees on the former camp site to disguise it and installed a Ukrainian “farmer” in a farmhouse to surveil the site.

Poland claims the Nazis killed 750,000 people in Treblinka; West Germany estimates 900,000. Zabecki, who recorded the numbers chalked on the transports that indicated the number of people inside while working at the station, estimates the Nazis killed 1,200,000 people in Treblinka, almost all of them Jews.

Part 3, Chapters 9-17 Analysis

In Glazar’s account, one of the most emotionally wrenching aspects of working in Treblinka was his awareness that his continued survival depended on the deaths of fellow Jews. The starkest example of this is when he learned that transports were going to continue, meaning a continued flow of supplies: “‘As of tomorrow,’ [Franz] said, ‘transports will be rolling in again.’ And do you know what we did? We shouted, ‘Hurrah, hurrah.’ It seems impossible now. Every time I think of it I die a small death” (606). This story exemplifies the spiritual death and corruption the Nazis inflicted upon those Jews they forced to work in the camps. As Sereny notes throughout the book, the Nazis not only killed millions of Jews but forced those they didn’t immediately kill into the impossible dilemma between survival and forced complicity with or dependence on their captors’ crimes.

In Treblinka’s final phases, Stangl developed an alarming addition to his usual rationalizations about his role. During his vacation in July 1943, with some distance from the camp’s daily horrors, Stangl likely gained some perspective on how morally corrupt Treblinka was. This realization required a new, stronger rationalization to protect him from his guilt. This materialized in his renewed Catholicism—which with its confessional offered, as he saw it, freedom from responsibility for his crimes: “What I did without, or against my free will, for that I need not answer” (634). This sentiment expresses the culmination of Stangl’s fatalistic attitude toward crimes he believed were out of his control but in reality weren’t, a continuation of the attitude he had both when the Gestapo took over his police force and when he was assigned to Hartheim.

In one sense, it’s understandable why Stangl developed his fatalistic attitude: He was surrounded by forces and processes in motion that were bigger than him and that likely wouldn’t have slowed much if he’d found the courage to leave his position. While these forces constrained his choices and likely did make dissent dangerous, they didn’t strip him of free will as he claimed they did. He was not the passive victim he likes to make himself out to be, though in a certain sense he was victimized, like so many others, by the Nazis’ methods, ideas, and plans.

Not only did Stangl stay in his job despite his serious misgivings, but he also excelled in it. This means the camp became more deadly as a direct result of his zeal for efficiency. He seems to realize this himself, which is why he becomes so uncharacteristically enraged by Sereny’s challenge to his motives: “I had to do as well as I could. That is how I am” (625). Again, reverting to his fatalism, Stangl frames it as if he had no choice but to optimize efficiency. Yet, of all the things he was responsible for in Treblinka, his mission to optimize its operation was perhaps the most under his control. In this instance, Stangl struggles to avoid the fact that he, not Wirth or Globocnik, spearheaded the efforts to make the camp more efficient and therefore deadlier. Stangl enjoyed optimization for its own sake, and he was able to separate that administrative work from its direct results in his mind, despite their proximity. His ambition and protectiveness of his job in the Austrian police are linked to his later zeal for optimization at Treblinka; he enjoyed his position and commendations at Treblinka, just as he had enjoyed his frequent promotions and awards in the Linz police force. He also knew that excelling at his job made him indispensable, thus protecting his position. Stangl’s ambition, managerial talent, and ability to remove himself from the direct effects of his work formed a toxic combination that resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text