logo

68 pages 2 hours read

Sinclair Lewis

It Can't Happen Here

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1935

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

American Totalitarianism

The primary theme of the book is American totalitarianism, which is broken into several sub-themes. The first of these sub-themes is that it’s possible for totalitarianism to take hold in America, in contrast to many characters who argue that it is not. From there, the primary themes are the rise of totalitarian governments, how such governments operate, and their internal contradictions.

The book argues that American totalitarianism is likely to be the product of a charismatic con-man and skilled orator who is able to channel popular dissatisfaction with existing politics-as-usual in times of crisis in order to propel himself and a close cabal of advisors to a position of power. Times of economic crisis allow legitimate grievances to be channeled by opportunistic candidates if they are not addressed by the existing political establishment.

Throughout the book, Lewis argues that class resentment is a crucial component of support for a would-be fascist, as represented by the character of Shad Ledue. Another aspect of support for the rise of totalitarianism in the book is resentment and discrimination along racial, religious, and gender lines. African-Americans, Jewish people, and women are all singled out as targets by Windrip on the campaign trail, which helps him build support by promising to roll back the clock to an earlier era, when these groups had fewer rights. The theme of individualism is also shown to be a component as many people vote for Windrip in the belief that he will make them materially better off. Lower-class characters vote for Windrip due to his promise of a guaranteed income of $5,000 per year, while wealthier characters believe that Windrip is the only one who can restore American capitalism to its former glory, which they believe will in turn enrich them.

When American totalitarianism is fully consolidated, a key theme is the casual cruelty and violence inherent to such forms of government. This is represented by Windrip’s Minute Men, who are frequently shown to enjoy their acts of violence, torture, and cultural destruction. Another sub-theme is how totalitarian governments utilize propaganda to control the flow of information. Universities, newspapers, radio stations, and other media organizations are quickly brought under the control of the government and are used to tell the population that everything is improving, while covering up the crimes carried out by the administration. However, once the propaganda apparatus starts to become less successful at containing dissent, another sub-theme is how totalitarian governments then turn to violence and repression to control their populations.

Finally, the book argues that totalitarianism is inherently contradictory and unstable. In contrast to Windrip’s promise to restore the glory of the American economy, his regime mismanages the country to such a degree that the economy suffers near-collapse, leading to breadlines and starvation. In addition, because totalitarian regimes are based around the total control of a small group of people, they lead to infighting that results in frequent coups and political instability. This is shown in the text as Windrip becomes increasingly paranoid and is eventually overthrown by his closet advisor, Sarason, who is in turn overthrown by Colonel Haik. Finally, a totalitarian regime’s emphasis on nationalism, conflict, and violence is also shown to be a key source of instability. While some who lose friends and family are cowed into submission, many others (as represented by Mary Jessup) are instead inspired to take up arms against the regime. More broadly speaking, when Haik attempts to start a war with Mexico by re-instituting the draft, he instead creates an armed rebellion against himself.

The Conditions Necessary for Liberal Democracy to Survive

Lewis’s book is a condemnation of all forms of totalitarian government, and a vigorous defense of liberal democracy as the best form of government. As such, a key theme of the book is the necessary conditions for liberal democracies to survive in the environment of the 1930s,during which time both fascism and communism were seen by many as viable alternatives.

This need for liberal democratism is represented best by Doremus Jessup, and the arc he goes through over the course of the novel. Broadly speaking, Jessup represents the necessity of the free press in challenging and checking forms of totalitarian government. However, at the start of the novel, Jessup (and by extension, those like him) is too complacent to stand up to Windrip’s rise until it’s too late. He only recognizes his power and importance after Windrip is firmly entrenched, and Jessup does not wind up doing real journalism until his newspaper has been taken over by the government. His spy cell does not engage in assassinations or sabotage, as doing so would go against liberal-democratic tenets. Instead, they publish real news that undermines government propaganda, in addition to publishing anti-regime editorials by Jessup and Pike. Even when Jessup returns to Corpo-controlled America at the end of the novel, his successful work is shown to be teaching the locals that it’s okay to laugh at the local Minute Men.

In order for liberal democracy to survive, citizens need to be engaged in democracy and capable of engaging with complex political topics. Windrip is shown to be vulgar, illiterate, and unintelligent, and his promises are contradictory and unrealistic. However, citizens are won over by his promises, and vote him into power. Later in the novel, Jessup realizes that totalitarian regimes are the fault of middle-class intellectuals such as Jessup himself, for not preventing regime installment when said intellectuals had the chance. Similarly, the novel does not condemn working-class voters as evil and instead blames a complacent political establishment for failing to address legitimate grievances.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text