logo

38 pages 1 hour read

Annie Barrows

Ivy and Bean

Fiction | Novel | Early Reader Picture Book | Published in 2010

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Literary Devices

Setting

The setting is a literary device that links to where the story takes place. The setting creates the environment for the characters and their actions. Aside from the shopping trip in Chapter 2, Ivy and Bean stick to the cul-de-sac named Pancake Court, where the titular characters live with their families. The street name is unique and silly, matching the girls’ personalities. They, too, are eccentric and humorous.

Barrows never names the town or state in the first book or the series, and the omission implies that the city or state isn’t important to the story. Based on Blackall’s drawings of the cul-de-sac, the neighborhood is generic and appears upper-middle class. None of the houses appear overly distinct, and they look like the type of houses occupied by people with dependable jobs and incomes. Neither Bean nor Ivy worry about shelter or food. As Ivy asks her mother for a banana, she assumes the fruit is there for her. However, the setting and plot don’t designate wealth or spoiled kids. For example, Nancy’s mother doesn’t offer to buy the $40 skirt that Nancy tries on, suggesting that she wants to educate her daughter about thoughtful consumerism.

Aside from the street name and the detail that it’s a cul-de-sac, the setting is generic and juxtaposes the adventures of the girls. If Ivy and Bean lived in a big city, they’d have to compete with the bustling nature of the location. As they’re in a nondescript town that Barrows doesn’t name, the girls’ play becomes the focal point and the main attraction. The tranquil environment creates a vacuum, and the girls counter the harmony of the setting by creating their own excitement through witchcraft.

Point of View

The point of view is a literary device that relates to the narrator. Though the book is about Ivy and Bean, and the girls comprise the title, neither Ivy nor Bean is the narrator. The point of view comes from a third-person limited voice. That is, the narrator isn’t a character in the story, but they’re someone outside the story. More so, the narrator doesn’t delve into the thoughts and emotions of every character, but they stick to Bean. The stress on Bean also makes the narration clear to follow and asserts the central role her character plays in the book.

As the narrator has access to what’s going on in Bean’s mind, the narrator can make statements like, “[N]ice, Bean knew, is another word for boring” (8). The narrator knows Bean thinks nice symbolizes boring because they’re allowed to enter and articulate Bean’s mentality. As the narrator can’t convey Ivy’s thoughts and feelings, they must let Ivy speak for herself. The reader knows Ivy feels similarly about the word “nice” because she tells Bean, “My mother keeps on saying what a nice girl you are. She's always telling me I should play with you. It's driving me nuts” (49). To make up for the lack of access to Ivy’s thoughts and feelings, the narrator relies on dialogue—what she says—to communicate her specific perspective.

The limited third-person point of view allows the narrator to be slightly misleading. If the narrator was omniscient and knew everything about the characters, they could intervene immediately and tell the reader that Bean’s judgment of Ivy is inaccurate: Ivy isn’t a “nice girl.” Since the narrator is limited, they can’t make such a sweeping statement. The point of view allows the misperception to exist until Bean and Ivy realize on their own that they misjudged each other.

For other moments, the third-person narrator allows for clarity. Committed to witchcraft and the imagination that it symbolizes, the girls often possess a farfetched view of reality. When Nancy falls into the pit, the girls conclude that Ivy’s dancing spell is the cause. The narrator subtly counters their creative interpretation by offering an objective depiction, “Back and forth she wobbled, trying to keep her balance” (103). The narrator doesn’t explicitly reject the girls’ version, but they offer another possibility, showing the reader that there might be a second explanation for why Nancy fell into the worm pit.

Juxtaposition

Juxtaposition is a literary device whereby the author places two separate people or things side by side to easily compare their differences. The title contains a juxtaposition, as the girls' names, Bean and Ivy, signify divergence. Bean links to beans—a hearty and filling food. Ivy connects to the green plant, which is sometimes poisonous. Bean is like a bean in that she’s robust and no-frills. Ivy is like ivy in that she’s a witch with the potential to cast dangerous spells. Yet, the title hints that Ivy and Bean aren’t such opposites. The conjunction “and”—or the plus symbol—indicates that Bean and Ivy go together. The title isn’t Ivy or Bean, nor is it Ivy Versus Bean. The term “and” or the “+” hints that the juxtaposition between the girls is a red herring.

Juxtaposition is central to the theme of Judging a Person Versus Knowing Them, and, in the first chapters, Barrows’s narrator uses it often to convey how assumptions based on appearances can lead people to believe they’re opposite from each other. The narrator writes, “Ivy wore a dress every day. Bean wore a dress when her mother made her. Ivy was always reading a big book. Bean never read big books. Reading made her jumpy” (9). The narrator goes from Ivy to Bean, then back to Ivy, then concludes with Bean. The back-and-forth produces sharp differences and juxtaposition. The narrator creates dissimilar images of the girls, and so do Blackall’s illustrations.

Once the girls start interacting with each other, the judging ends, and the juxtaposition vanishes. The girls realize that their differences are superficial. They look like they wouldn’t get along, yet now that they’re together, they discover that they have a lot in common. They become friends and share the same spaces—Ivy’s room, the various backyards, Bean’s playhouse, and more—so there’s little to juxtapose. They’re not different entities but friends working together to put the spell on Nancy.

As Bean and Ivy stop juxtaposing one another, the juxtaposition switches to Bean and Ivy versus Nancy. As an antagonist, Nancy is verifiably different from Ivy and Bean. Nancy has separate interests. Her concerns are shopping and getting her ears pierced. She ridicules Ivy and Bean’s witchcraft, telling them, “You guys are complete and total dweebs” (97). The sustained juxtaposition between Ivy and Bean as a unit and Nancy creates conflict and gives the girls a target for the dancing spell.

Repetition

Repetition is a literary device whereby the author repeats specific words or moments to reinforce a symbol, motif, theme, or another literary element. In Ivy and Bean, Barrows regularly repeats “nice” to emphasize its pejorative meaning among the girls. The narrator writes, “Ivy did seem like such a nice girl. Even from across the street, she looked nice. But nice, Bean knew, is another word for boring” (8). The quote contains three sentences, each with the word “nice.” The repetition bonds Ivy to the term and seemingly proves Bean’s point that she and Ivy are incompatible. The repetition also creates a dramatic moment, as Barrows interrupts each “nice” with “boring.” The final word provides a twist, and it explains why Bean doesn’t want to play with Ivy. No matter how often the term “nice” appears, it won’t change Bean’s perception of the word. It remains code for a dull, unexciting person.

Repetition also helps Barrows show how words relate to action. The narrator says, “Bean loved big groups of kids playing big games, like pirates or hide-and-seek” (25). The repetition of “big” conveys the cause and effect. When there are a lot of children present, they can play complex games. Repetition also shows how words don’t always connect to a specific action. After Mrs. Trantz catches Bean and Ivy in her backyard garden, she scolds them and Bean apologizes. Mrs. Trantz replies, "I don't think you're sorry, Bernice. If you were sorry, you wouldn't keep coming into my garden when I have asked you not to” (79). Mrs. Trantz repeats sorry because she wants its meaning to have an effect on Bean. Bean’s “sorry” lacks cause and effect. She apologizes, but her repeated apologies don’t satisfy Mrs. Trantz because the repetition doesn’t connect to a change in Bean’s behavior.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text