32 pages • 1 hour read
Sarah Shun-lien BynumA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Point of view is the perspective from which a story is told. “Likes” is told from the third-person limited perspective, following Dave and revealing his observations and thoughts. Sarah Shun-lien Bynum shows Ivy’s Instagram posts and Dave and his daughter’s interactions through Dave’s eyes. The narrative point of view parallels the alienation Dave feels from his daughter—and from other adults, like the physical therapist and, at times, his wife. Though Dave tries desperately to understand Ivy, he always feels distant or separate from her, reflected in how the text remains only with his thoughts. Alongside these feelings of alienation, the narrative point of view gives insight into Dave’s anxious mental state more broadly. He is constantly preoccupied with how he is perceived (not unlike his daughter), fretting about whether the therapist thinks he’s a bad father, for example. While things happen around him, Dave gets lost in his thoughts, obsessing about his daughter’s feelings or the election. As such, the story’s point of view helps convey Dave’s emotional state.
While the story is told chronologically, it is not told linearly, with a beginning, middle, and end and each plot point affecting the next. Instead, it is told in a series of vignettes, short scenes that create moods, convey feelings, or build characterization. The vignettes are also not individual stories with typical narrative arcs; they are simply moments from Dave’s family life.
These vignettes combine to create an impression of Dave’s relationship with his daughter, which is likewise nonlinear. Their dynamic changes each day, depending on their moods and what has happened to them each day. This structure emphasizes that “Likes” is not a straightforward story about a father making progress (or not) toward getting to know his daughter. Instead, it is meant to parallel the way relationships are built in real life, through endless small moments together and the meaning one derives from them.
The story is peppered with allusions, or references to other works of literature or other cultural touchstones. Dave and Ivy are both characterized through their allusions, as these references sketch the framework of their different lived experiences. Dave’s allusions include more classical and adult topics. For example, he calls Ivy and other girls’ similar Instagram posts an example of “Groupthink,” alluding to George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four to insinuate that this type of girl is mindless and indoctrinated into consumer culture. He also references Joan of Arc when he mistakes a makeup palette for a sleeping “pallet,” emphasizing his disdain for superficial interests over history or culture.
By contrast, Ivy and the influencers she follows use name-dropping over literary allusions: Home Goods, Simple, Clinique, YouTube, etc. These brands create a shared vocabulary for young consumers, each signifying something particular to them. Notably, Clinique has brand recognition for Dave and Ivy both, hinting that the generational divide is not as wide as he thinks.
Satire is the use of humor, ridicule, irony, or exaggeration to criticize someone or something. Dave uses satire to discuss influencer culture and politicians he doesn’t like, creating a link between these two types of people. In the moments before the car accident, Dave is running through a satirized version of YouTubers in his mind. Ivy has just asked him if she can get a book written by one of her favorite influencers and argues that “it’s reading” when she sees his disdain. Dave goes into a spiral: “But could it really be called reading? Did it actually count as a book? Or was it just something AMAZING, Something to be SO EXCITED about” (198). The all-caps create emphasis on the sorts of adjectives heavily used in YouTube videos, which convey exaggerated (and often unspecific) emotions.
This inner commentary continues into a second paragraph that is also punctuated by superlatives in all caps. While Dave doesn’t overtly shift his satirical tone, a closer look at the second paragraph indicates that Dave is no longer ridiculing his daughter’s heroes but rather Donald Trump by mimicking his famous cadence. The language is similar between the two: “In fact, would it be going too far to call it TREMENDOUS? Something INCREDIBLE. A massive story. And very complex. Made by some really incredible people. Of such incredible talent. It will be a big win, there’s no question about it” (198).
While Dave thinks himself above the language and people he satirizes, he becomes so distracted by his internal monologue that he gets into a car crash. This subverts his superiority complex, immediately bringing him down to Earth, as represented by the contrast between his thoughts and the physical reality of his daughter’s breath after the accident.