logo

56 pages 1 hour read

William Shakespeare

Love's Labour's Lost

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1598

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

Hunting a Deer

Hunting a deer was a popular literary analogy for The Masculine Pursuit of Love, containing a number of symbols within the imagery connected with love and sex. The word “hart,” meaning a deer, associated this animal with the heart; bows and arrows were associated with Cupid. The horn, as found on male deer, also had sexual connotations. It was a phallic symbol, but was also associated with cuckoldry, or a woman’s infidelity toward her male lover: The cuckold was thus portrayed wearing horns on his head as an object of ridicule. These images reoccur throughout the play, reflecting its concern with love and desire, and also with deception and pride within love.

For example, at the end of 4.1, Boyet uses the analogy of an archer to question Rosaline about who her admirer is. She deflects by bantering with him about horns, suggesting that he is not well-endowed; he uses this same imagery to imply that she will be unfaithful and cuckold her hypothetical husband. She teases him for being unable to “hit” her (with his bow)—meaning that he cannot beat her at wordplay, or woo her. Through comparing love to archery, they portray it as a competition or struggle with the potential to wound; their jokes about the word “horn” indicate that pride and a sense of honor are connected to sexual conquest and to fidelity. William Shakespeare uses this symbolic imagery to show the potential of The Complexities of Language, as Rosaline and Boyet play with its many possible meanings.

The hunting of a deer is also portrayed onstage in Act II, bringing this symbol to the fore. The Princess discusses the harm produced by those who prioritize skill at the deer’s expense: They may wound it rather than killing it in their attempt to show off (4.1.25-37). She mentions the “heart” twice in this speech, playing off the homophone “hart.” Through this symbolic lens, her statements recall her critique of Boyet in 2.1: She warns that if love is pursued as a means to flaunt skill or present an ideal of masculinity, rather than with real commitment to the lady, this will cause injury.

Letters

Letters are a central motif in Love’s Labour’s Lost. They are crucial to the plot: They are mixed up, revealing important information to the Lords (that Berowne too is in love) and the ladies (that Rosaline has an admirer). This comedic mix-up places Love’s Labour’s Lost firmly into the comedy genre. The love letter was also a popular romantic motif; the fact that all four Lords send one to each of the ladies synchronously builds the anticipation that the play will conclude with symmetrical marriages, enhancing the power of the twist at the end of Act V. Through this symmetry, Shakespeare also satirizes the formulaic approach to love taken by both the Lords and the play itself—they all follow the same steps in their wooing.

This formulaic quality, echoed in their poetic content, contributes to the fact that the women do not take the letters’ declarations of love seriously. They demonstrate the importance of language—words can cross the physical distance between people to communicate meaning, but words also encapsulate language’s fallibility. Letters can be misunderstood or go astray, suggesting the inherent difficulty of true communication between people. Shakespeare uses the letters to contribute to his exploration of the complexity of language and communication more broadly.

Disguises and Masks

Disguises and masks are a recurring motif, foregrounding the theme of Fantasy Versus Reality as the fantastical identity offered by the mask contrasts with the real person underneath. Similar to the use of letters, the use of disguises or masks was a common feature in Elizabethan theatre, including many of Shakespeare’s other plays.

Shakespeare uses disguises to explore the way the characters perform their roles. Dressed as Muscovites, the Lords feel able to approach the women despite their oath, and are bold enough to request private conversation and swear love, as the disguises offer the protection of anonymity. Rosaline easily takes to performing the role of the Princess, allowing her to demonstrate an assertiveness and capacity for leadership that is usually constrained by her social position. Through the rest of the play, the Princess dominates conversation in the men’s presence, whereas in this scene, Rosaline speaks freely and dictates the interaction. Shakespeare uses disguises to illustrate that the characters are defined by the social roles they are assigned, but have the capacity to behave differently given the opportunity, an idea he explores through the masculine disguises taken on by women in plays such as Twelfth Night, As You Like It, and The Merchant of Venice.

This masked scene in 5.2 is the first time the Lords try to woo the ladies in person, with Shakespeare using the visual metaphor of the disguises to explore performance and deception within love. Every character is playing a person other than themselves: The ladies invite vows they know are meant for someone else, while the men swear love to them while wearing another identity and without seeing their faces, indicating a performative or abstract quality to their love. Shakespeare suggests the allure of the unknown or unavailable in this scene, as each character is keeping back a part of themselves, but the facade of the masks also highlights the surface quality of their interactions. This foreshadows the Princess’s statement later in 5.2 that she cannot rush into marriage with the King (5.2.865-66), choosing to set him a challenge instead to prove that his love goes beyond a superficial performance of romance.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text