logo

46 pages 1 hour read

Laurie Kaye Abraham

Mama Might Be Better Off Dead: The Failure of Health Care in Urban America

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1993

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 6-9Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 6 Summary: “The Inner-City Emergency Room”

Turning her focus away from Mrs. Jackson’s particular case, Abraham examines the urban emergency room, which she argues “is where the inequities and distortions of a health-care nonsystem—one driven more by patients’ ability to pay than by their medical need—are most obvious” (93). Over the course of one night shift, she follows the emergency room doctors at Mt. Sinai as they juggle an overwhelming and fast-paced caseload. Uninsured patients flock to the emergency room because they cannot afford other doctors and because the emergency room doctors cannot turn patients away. While shadowing this particular night shift, Abraham watches the doctor juggle 12 cases at the same time with a limited number of beds available, including two teenage pregnancies, a gunshot wound victim, and a young boy with a soccer injury. Though several of these cases could (and probably should) have been handled by doctors in other departments, emergency doctors are so used to this way of working that they find a way to manage with minimal complaints.

Chapter 7 Summary: “One Hospital’s Story: How Treating the Poor Is ‘Bad’ for Business”

Having established the fraught working conditions at Mt. Sinai in the book’s present day, Abraham provides an overview of the hospital’s history up to that point. This history helps to explain why the emergency room workers of the late ‘80s and early ‘90s found themselves overwhelmed and under-resourced. Mt. Sinai was originally established as a charity hospital for North Lawndale’s Eastern European Jewish community in the first half of the 20th century. The other major Jewish hospital in Chicago, Michael Reese, served primarily German Jews, and the Eastern European Jews did not feel welcomed there. However, despite animosity from members of the Jewish community and the Associated Jewish Charities of Chicago board, which viewed Michael Reese as the only worthwhile hospital in the city, Mt. Sinai was able to garner enough funding for steady growth in its earliest years of operation.

However, in the mid-20th century, when Jewish patients started leaving the neighborhood for more affluent parts of the city, the administration at Mt. Sinai faced an existential dilemma. Should they continue their charity work on the West Side, now with a Black patient population, or should they court wealthy patients who could keep the hospital afloat? At first, they tried to do both, but these efforts were minimally successful and resulted in what many saw as discrimination against Black patients. Abraham notes that tensions between Jewish and Black donors prevented Mt. Sinai from receiving copious funding from either group. They even considered relocating to a different part of the city and merging with Michael Reese, but by the time these plans were put in place, the hospital did not have enough money to enact them. Therefore, Mt. Sinai remains a hospital committed to treating its community’s poor Black patients, barely scraping by every year.

Chapter 8 Summary: “Who’s Responsible for Tommy Markham’s Health?”

Abraham returns to the story of Tommy Markham. He receives medical care at Lawndale Christian Health Center, which is run by Dr. Arthur Jones. The health center is another medical institution that scrapes by on meager government funding. In his appointments with Dr. Jones, Tommy dodges questions, wavering between being willing to give up some of his bad habits (like smoking and drinking) and not. Abraham uses these conversations as a gateway into a discussion of the Republican government’s position on “individual responsibility” for healthcare. Under President George H. W. Bush, Dr. Louis Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, began to promote the idea that individual Americans should be held responsible for their own healthcare circumstances. This platform, Abraham argues, ignores the plethora of involuntary factors that impact the health of people like Tommy, such as race and socioeconomic status.

Chapter 9 Summary: “Jackie Banes’s ‘Patient’”

Abraham rejoins Jackie at the apartment as she tries to take care of the three children and Cora simultaneously. Cora frequently demands that Jackie remake food for her, and moments like this wear heavily on Jackie’s nerves. Five years prior, conservative policymakers pushed through legislation in Congress that resulted in a spike in home healthcare denials by Medicare; the program increasingly deemed at-home health services “unnecessary” and therefore unfundable. Although these policies were reversed in 1989, agencies remain cautious when it comes to providing home services, fearful that the government will simply reverse its policies once more. As a result, some crucial services for Cora, including her physical therapy, were cut short for fear that they would not be fundable. These sacrifices within Cora’s healthcare plan have made Jackie’s experience caring for Cora increasingly difficult: “Better mobility for Mrs. Jackson would have made Jackie’s job easier” (150).

As the months wear on, Jackie begins to consider placing Cora in a nursing home. Jackie’s daughter Latrice is doing poorly in school for the first time ever, and this shift can be attributed, in part, to the fact that Jackie does not have enough time to facilitate her schoolwork. However, again, the decision to transfer Cora to a nursing home comes with potentially prohibitive costs. Even worse, Jackie feels guilty that such a decision would make Cora feel abandoned. The burnout associated with being a full-time caregiver is not something that can be alleviated without proper funds. Therefore, Jackie continues to feel boxed in and unable to provide her grandmother with adequate care.

Chapters 6-9 Analysis

These chapters shift focus to the issue of government and hospital responsibility to the Banes family and the consequences that occur when such responsibilities are not met. Abraham’s unyielding critique of conservative policymaking in Chapter 8 addresses the tendency to blame the poor for their own health circumstances, and she redirects the blame toward the conservative government. This critique is often delivered via sarcastic rhetorical questions: “After all, if these poor folks make themselves sick, why should we waste our efforts helping them out?” (141). By facetiously adopting the talking points of conservative lawmakers like Dr. Sullivan, Abraham suggests that extreme apathy is inherent to their rhetoric. She tries to combat this apathy throughout the book by lending consistent empathy to the Banes family and their overwhelmed doctors. At its core, the message of the book boils down to this issue of empathy. She argues that “[m]edical interventions must be developed within the confines of real human behavior, whether it is judged responsible or not” (145). In this way, she suggests that the moralistic handling of the healthcare system by conservative politicians has an obstructive effect on the system’s ability to carry out its intended purpose, and what’s more, it deems some patients less worthy of help than others.

However, as many of Abraham’s findings suggest, achieving such empathy for underprivileged patients hinges not only on the government but also on the decisions of individual hospital administrations. The account of how racism factored into hospital administrators’ desire to leave the area confirms that biases against Black patients exist at nearly every level of the American healthcare system, not just the federal one. Racial tensions on the municipal level also hurt the healthcare system in key ways. Such Intersections Between Medicine and Sociology are completely ignored by government platforms that place responsibility for health on the shoulders of each individual patient. By exploring these intersections, Abraham argues that the Banes family cannot help that its neighborhood is one where the primary hospital has little money due to broader politics.

As the debate over “individual responsibility” plays out in the broad, abstract political sphere, Abraham returns to the issue of how Jackie is coping with her numerous responsibilities. Since nobody else will take full responsibility for Cora, Jackie has to, as well as take care of “her own three children and her ailing husband” (151). Jackie’s inability to live life for herself is the most glaring consequence of the medical establishment’s failures in its responsibilities to the Banes family. By humanizing such consequences and giving them a face (Jackie’s) for readers, Abraham pulls healthcare inequity out of the abstract realm of politics and into the concrete realm of life and death.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text