62 pages • 2 hours read
E. M. ForsterA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Forster wrote Maurice at a pivotal moment in LGBT history. In England, the 1885 Labouchere Amendment had criminalized all sexual activity between men; partial restrictions had been in place for centuries prior and were subject to capital punishment until 1861. Religious belief drove some of this anti-gay stance, but the era’s growing secularism also played a role; the drive to understand human nature scientifically facilitated the redefinition of gay attraction as a mental illness rather than a sinful act. At the same time, the idea that being gay was an internal and relatively stable trait allowed new kinds of communities to form, including what could be considered early LGBT advocacy groups. Those seeking positive visions of being gay could also look to certain non-Western or premodern traditions—most commonly, Ancient Greece’s tolerance of certain kinds of gay relationships.
Maurice invokes most of these perspectives at one point or another. The novel depicts Maurice’s attraction to men as an inborn characteristic he half-recognizes long before consciously experiencing any romantic or sexual feelings; when Ducie tries to explain heterosexual sex to Maurice, he “could not himself relate it; it fell to pieces […] like an impossible sum” (14). This is perhaps one reason why internalized anti-gay feelings doesn’t loom especially large in Maurice’s life; his sexual orientation is so integral to his identity that it’s the thought of changing it that strikes him as an unnatural “violat[ion]” of “body and soul” (170). Similarly, when Clive announces his heterosexuality, it’s his attraction to women that Maurice views as diseased, since it contradicts Clive’s identity as Maurice understands it.
Nevertheless, Maurice does feel the lack of positive depictions of being gay—specifically, ones that frame love between men not just as defensible, but as a viable path to happiness. He especially worries about dying childless, and his time with Clive does little to challenge his fear that being gay is inevitably “sterile” (97). Clive understands his sexuality largely through the lens of Hellenism, and while sexual relationships between men certainly existed in ancient Greece, Clive models his behavior on the idealized, platonic relationships described in philosophical texts like Phaedrus. The immediate result is that Clive insists his relationship with Maurice remain chaste, but this celibacy is emblematic of a broader problem: the “deathly” nature of love that is both heavily intellectualized and associated with a culture that no longer exists.
To provide Maurice with a happy ending, the novel therefore needs to present a vision of being gay that is as “living” as heterosexuality, despite the absence of children. In some ways, the novel suggests that gay relationships are inherently creative, since they exist outside social norms and conventions, and therefore require the participants to invent the relationship as they go: “And their love scene drew out, having the inestimable gain of a new language […] They were concerned with a passion that few English minds have admitted, and so created untrammelled” (93). Love can also be a vehicle for self-reinvention, acting as “an incentive to virtue” (143). It isn’t until Maurice meets Alec that this vision is fully realized, however; Alec’s association with the natural world’s bounty, the sexual love he shares with Maurice, and the double transgressiveness of desire that is not just gay but cross-class all combine to create a relationship that is truly “untrammelled.”
Although primarily concerned with heteronormativity, Maurice also critiques other forms of societal pressure and control. The culture Maurice depicts is both highly conformist and stratified along various lines—most obviously, class and gender. Consequently, the general shape of an individual’s life is determined from the moment they’re born. This is true even of the relatively privileged, because that privilege consists of preordained power and success; when Maurice enters an investment firm and begins exercising his authority at home, he is simply “stepping into the niche that England had prepared for him” (55).
A society that assigns people to particular “niches” poses clear problems for those whose niche is subordinate; Kitty, for example, clearly resents her financial dependence on her brother. However, there’s an even more fundamental problem: This kind of society stifles individual development and thus prevents people from realizing their full humanity. Because there’s little incentive to question societal norms and assumptions (in fact, there’s enormous pressure not to), most people never develop beliefs and passions that are uniquely their own, or even accept traditional beliefs in anything but the most passive ways.
The novel’s treatment of religion is a good example. What Clive (and later Maurice) object to isn’t Christianity per se, but rather the unreflective way most of society practices it:
It didn’t exist till opposition touched it, when it ached like a useless nerve. They all had these nerves at home, and regarded them as divine, though neither the Bible nor the Prayer Book nor the Sacraments nor Christian ethics nor anything spiritual were alive to them (46).
Unlike genuine belief, which provides a “wider outlook” and thus encourages personal growth (46), this profession of Christian feeling is simply a way of signaling group membership; in other words, it actively hampers individual development.
Ironically, in this atmosphere, it’s precisely the fact that being gay isn’t tolerated that, in Forster’s words, “saves” Maurice (251). Maurice is average in every respect but his sexual orientation. What’s more, those around him reward his mediocrity, because it presents no challenge to the status quo: “The school clapped not because Maurice was eminent but because he was average. It could celebrate itself in his image” (25-26). Maurice would therefore likely never have challenged any of his preconceptions if his sexuality hadn’t directly clashed with them; the fact that it does forces him to think for himself, and ultimately to develop qualities that truly are exceptional. This becomes particularly clear in his interactions with Alec. Not only does Maurice see past Alec’s class, but he demonstrates real empathy and courage, first in noticing the fear motivating Alec’s actions, and then in choosing to leave his comfortable middle-class life for Alec. These are character traits Maurice has only gained through years of conflict with society.
Class is a longstanding fault-line in English society. In pre-industrial times, the major division lay between the landed gentry or aristocracy and the lower-class peasantry, many of whom were tenant farmers. Over time, a professional and commercial middle class also emerged, along with the urban lower class of the 18th and 19th-century Industrial Revolution. By the time Maurice takes place, class was therefore both an entrenched feature of English society, and an increasingly complex system that overlapped with other divisions (urban versus rural, modern capitalism versus the vestiges of feudalism, etc.).
Maurice’s three main male characters embody the three major social classes—upper, middle, and working. Clive is gentry and the heir to a country estate; he also follows a conventionally upper-class career path, studying law before entering politics. Alec is a gamekeeper, although his family are independent tradespeople, and he shares that group's general disdain for the service sector of the working class. Lastly, Maurice himself is quintessentially middle-class, both in profession and disposition; he works as a stockbroker, lives in the suburbs, and is generally conformist.
In this sense, Maurice’s relationships with Clive and Alec dramatize early 20th-century English class dynamics. Maurice belongs to a class that is upwardly mobile but conscious that it lacks a pedigree; he’s therefore easily impressed by Clive, next to whom he initially feels like “a yokel in Athens” (57). However, it soon becomes clear that the class Clive represents is increasingly irrelevant to English society; though it still considers itself responsible for “set[ting] standards [and] control[ing] the future” (239), it no longer has the money to back these aspirations. Penge is in disrepair when Maurice first visits, and it only deteriorates further by the time he returns: “Through pouring rain he had noticed gate posts crooked, trees stifling, and indoors some bright wedding presents showed as patches on a threadbare garment” (166-67). Clive’s chastity is equally symbolic, evoking the “impotence” and “sterility” of his class.
By contrast, Alec initially seems to embody the bluntness and earthy sexuality the middle classes ascribed to the lower classes. Maurice’s first impressions certainly reflect his class’s disregard for the working classes’ humanity; believing that the poor “haven’t [the middle and upper class’s] feelings” (168), he assumes Alec has only written in order to blackmail him. Maurice’s prejudices prove unfounded, however. Though Alec does threaten blackmail, he does this because he anticipates Maurice’s classism, and recognizes his own vulnerability; despite Maurice’s fears, it’s actually Alec who’s most at risk of prosecution. This is why Maurice must ultimately leave his middle-class life to embark on a relationship with Alec. Like the upper classes in particular, the class system in general “belong[s] to the past” (245). Since the same past condemns being gay, Maurice suggests that love between men will only truly flourish when class ceases to matter.
One of the defining characteristics of modernist literature is its debt to Freudian theory. Although writers like Forster didn’t necessarily accept all of Freud’s tenets, their work often assumed, and worked to represent, something similar to the Freudian “unconscious”: feelings, instincts, desires, memories, etc. that aren’t accessible in ordinary waking life. In traditional Freudian theory, this material, which is often sexual, is “repressed” during childhood development to avoid mental distress; however, these repressed thoughts and feelings surface periodically in dreams, jokes, and (in some cases) psychiatric illness.
The influence of this idea on Maurice is clear within the novel’s first few chapters. Well before Maurice can articulate his attraction to men, he’s uncomfortable with society’s heteronormative expectations; the novel opens with Maurice’s confused response to Mr. Ducie’s sex talk, which “[bears] no relation to his experiences” (13). Throughout his adolescence, Maurice also experiences recurring dreams that point to his true nature: a homoerotic fantasy involving the Halls’s garden boy, and a more abstract longing for a male companion. However, these desires are so deeply buried that Maurice doesn’t connect them to his orientation’s more conscious manifestations, including the teenage infatuations he assumes are platonic:
The other half of his life seemed infinitely remote from obscenity [i.e. puberty’s physical effects]. As he rose in the school he began to make a religion of some other boy. When this boy, whether older or younger than himself, was present, he would laugh loudly, talk absurdly, and be unable to work (24).
Reconciling these two sides of his experience into a cohesive sexuality is therefore key to Maurice’s personal growth. This process might seem complete when Maurice realizes that he’s gay, but it in fact extends through most of the novel. Since Clive and Maurice’s relationship is platonic, Maurice’s remains alienated from his sexual feelings until the incident with Dickie forces him to recognize them: “His feeling for Dickie required a very primitive name. He would have sentimentalized once and called it adoration, but the habit of honesty had grown strong. […] ‘Lust.’ He said the word out loud” (150). Even then, Maurice continues struggling against these feelings—most obviously when he consults Lasker-Jones. It’s only after sleeping with Alec that Maurice is able to integrate what the novel calls the “brutal” (sexual) and “ideal” (romantic) sides of himself into a single, healthy sexuality (23).
However, Maurice’s depiction of the unconscious differs from Freud’s in one very significant way: There’s an ambiguously supernatural quality to some of Maurice’s unconscious experiences. The clearest examples are Maurice’s dreams of a “friend,” which seem to predict his relationship with Alec; when Maurice first visits Lasker-Jones, just hours before sleeping with Alec for the first time, he says he dreamed the figure was “sort of walking towards [him] through sleep” (183). Of course, since Maurice has seen Alec by this point, he likely already feels attracted to him on an unconscious level. The dream isn’t sexual, however; it involves a romantic relationship Maurice has no reason to anticipate, and (given his classist attitudes) wouldn’t at this point desire. Furthermore, this dream actually brings about what it predicts, since it causes Maurice to call out in his sleep, and Alec to then respond. Maurice therefore hints that the unconscious can contain not only repressed personal knowledge, but also knowledge about the world at large that isn’t accessible to the conscious mind.
By E. M. Forster
Books About Art
View Collection
Books Made into Movies
View Collection
British Literature
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
LGBTQ Literature
View Collection
Pride Month Reads
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection