57 pages • 1 hour read
Carol S. DweckA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
After exploring mindsets, the worldviews these perspectives create, and the consequences each one has on real people, Dweck dives into where the mindsets come from and why some people might have a growth mindset when others cling to a fixed one. She views the social world as steeped in both fixed- and growth-mindset messages.
Praise is a source of one type of messaging, and Dweck cites her series of seven experiments on children before concluding that praising the fixed trait of intelligence actively harms motivation and performance. She points out that this also happens to be the kind of praise children like most, because it gives them a short-term confidence boost; it is also the type of praise parents and teachers give most often. Dweck notes that this praise is tied to the short-term, highly visible moment or performance, not the longer, less-visible process of getting there. The best remedy, she says, is to replace praise that focuses on talent, ability, or intelligence with affirmation of new or creative strategies and honest effort. She also suggests tempering children’s need for praise altogether by encouraging them to seek out challenges and commit to learning in all that they undertake. Another strategy she suggests is to ask questions instead of praising, which sends the message that adults value the thoughts and processes behind the work a child has done.
Failure is another arena for messaging that Dweck explores. The cultural belief that children must be protected from failure and disappointment not only sends a fixed-mindset message but actively undermines a child’s ability to build resilience skills. To grow and develop, Dweck points out, children need adults to show them where they failed and to provide feedback that shows them how to do better next time. Harsh or judgmental criticism, however, can reinforce fixed-mindset beliefs, because it reduces mistakes to character flaws. Harsh discipline similarly backfires because it sends the message that faults should be punished, rather than providing strategies to improve or make amends. Judgments not only send fixed-mindset messages but also undermine relationships because children begin to believe that offers for help or support are really just disguised opportunities to be judged. Dweck also observes that children pass on adults’ messaging to others, citing a study that asked second graders to give advice to a fictional peer who was struggling in math. The fixed-mindset children had little to say, whereas their growth-minded peers offered many workable solutions.
Dweck points out that the stakes of fixed-mindset messaging can be measured in student mental health and well-being. Parents with fixed mindsets, Dweck observes, may push ideas onto their children and pigeonhole them into pursuing interests that support the parents’ sense of validation. This leads to children who have no room to be themselves. Parents might also tie performance to love, sending a message that it is contingent upon the child’s success, which creates pressure and anxiety. The stakes are also high when teachers and coaches transmit their own fixed mindsets to students. Teachers with fixed mindsets create cultures of judgment by reinforcing stereotypes, emphasizing talent over effort, and focusing less on students with lower initial performance. Dweck says fixed-mindset teachers don’t believe children can improve, so they spend less time with lower performers. This creates the conditions for self-fulfilling prophecies. By contrast, Dweck observes that growth-minded teachers and coaches create cultures of trust, rather than cultures of judgment, by de-emphasizing talent and combatting stereotypes. They maintain high standards while providing all students with the steps and strategies to reach them, and they help their charges embrace failure as the catalyst for deeper learning.
Dweck acknowledges that teachers and others have used her mindset theory in unintended ways. She cautions against the “false growth mindset” that can arise from misunderstanding mindset theory (214). Growth mindset, Dweck says, is not about being open-minded; it is about being growth-oriented. Likewise, it is not about just any effort but focuses on sustained effort in the pursuit of growth and learning. Praising effort as a consolation for a loss or failure, especially when no effort was made, does not promote a growth mindset; nor does simply telling students they need to work harder without providing the feedback or resources for them to grow from the work. This process requires helping students learn the skills and access the resources needed to achieve their goals. Finally, Dweck emphasizes that teachers and coaches who shame students for having a fixed mindset or believe a student is unreachable simply reinforce that child’s views, as well as their own.
In the end, Dweck encourages teachers, coaches, and parents to consistently deliver process-oriented praise, respond proactively to mistakes and failures, keep high standards, and teach for deeper understanding rather than for memorization and performance. She invites the reader to reflect on their own upbringing and mindset messaging with exercises at the end of the chapter. Firm, nurturing, growth-minded parents, coaches, and teachers uplift and teach children, give them space to explore and stretch their interests, provide honest feedback, and maintain high expectations for everyone, regardless of initial performance.
In her final chapter, Dweck focuses on the implications of her work in mindset theory. At the heart of her theory and studies is the positive proof that humans can all learn and grow and that individual potential grows the more a person believes in their ability to grow and change. Though everyone has fixed mindset traits and growth mindset traits, Dweck says her research shows that the more people develop their growth mindset, the more they gain in terms of well-being and success. She builds on cognitive therapy creator Aaron Beck’s observations that in many of his patients, their exaggerated beliefs, not their illness, caused their problems. Beck invented cognitive therapy to teach patients to recognize and pay attention to these beliefs whenever they arose and to use reasoning to make these judgments more rational. But, says Dweck, reasonable judgments are still judgments; thus, mindset theory helps train patients to stop judging altogether.
Dweck acknowledges that human minds are constantly working in the background to monitor and interpret the world, but it is a person’s base mindset that shapes this interpretation. Fixed mindsets create a judgment-oriented version, while growth mindsets create a development-oriented account of events. Simply learning about the different mindsets and the way they shift the inner monologue can help a person be more attuned to mindset messaging and empower them to bypass judgment for learning. As proof, Dweck shares her experiences and testimony from students and teachers regarding the impact of Brainology—her eight-session mindset workshop for adolescents—and of college seminars in which she taught similar material to older students. Dweck and others agree that simply learning about the brain’s ability to grow increases engagement and motivation in even the most resistant students. She states that deep down, everyone wants to grow and be good at things. Learning that this is possible motivates students who were previously afraid that if they made an effort, they might simply prove their own lack of ability. Also, says Dweck, teachers learned and changed their own thinking and approaches to students after the Brainology workshop.
Change is hard, and Dweck cautions that people who are resistant to changing their mindsets have valid reasons for that. To explain why a fixed mindset might feel comfortable even after learning there are alternatives, she cites Karen Horney and Karl Rogers, who propose that children who feel insecure about parental acceptance create a persona that the parent might like better, and this gives them a feeling of control. Likewise, says Dweck, the fixed mindset becomes a means to maintain control, gain self-esteem, and explain identity. To adopt a growth mindset, says Dweck, is to dispense with this secure persona by embracing experiences that are directly at odds with it, like risk and challenge, but Dweck promises that the process is worth the discomfort. She is confident that her research and the case studies she shares prove that change is worthwhile.
The chapter ends with exercises, along with Dweck’s best advice for making lasting change. Many of these involve working through dilemmas and observing both fixed- and growth-oriented approaches. Others involve incremental goal setting and creating proactive plans to accomplish them.
Dweck assumes the reader is ready to make big changes to their mindset and to coach others in the growth mindset by the final chapters. To guide receptive readers through this process, Dweck recognizes that readers must first learn to identify and deconstruct the wide variety of social messaging from which the mindsets arise, including those they may unintentionally send to others. She continues to rely on a narrative style of contrast and deconstruction, supported by evidence from case studies. In these chapters, Dweck applies her deconstruction to societal narratives and misconceptions that teachers, coaches, and parents have regarding child development.
Understanding that the reader also experiences social messaging, Dweck anticipates popular societal narratives that might be guiding readers’ questioning or hesitation and uses studies and examples to combat the narratives that she believes inhibit young people’s potential to grow and learn. For example, Dweck tackles the popular narrative that praise raises self-esteem. First, she shows the reader that such simple statements as “You’re so brilliant, you got an A without even studying” (177) can undermine children’s growth by stigmatizing work and effort. She provides both narrative and research-driven proofs that praise creates anxiety and a fear of failure.
Dweck cultivates empathy for children by focusing on the impacts of parents’ misguided fixations on their child’s natural talents, such as the violin student whose parents forced him to memorize Beethoven’s violin concerto, only to have him perform it robotically and without passion, or the kindergartner whose father punished him for simply forgetting the number eight on his worksheet. Dweck builds empathy by conceding that in most instances, people with both growth and fixed mindsets want their children and their charges to do their best. However, she firmly points out that only those who learn to prioritize children’s development over their need for validation and to send growth-oriented messages actually provide the tools for children to grow into their potential. By contrasting the results and impacts of fixed-mindset practices in teaching, coaching, and parenting with examples of growth-minded practices and leading the reader through a series of reflections, Dweck models the necessary processes the reader needs to identify, confront, and deconstruct their own practices and beliefs.
Dweck is careful to confront errors in this process toward the end of Chapter 7, taking the reader through a reflective meta-analysis of the unintended impacts of her work. She steers readers away from misconceptions that lead to negative practices, such as labeling students with fixed mindsets as unreachable or punishing fixed-mindset comments with ridicule. Again, Dweck actively models the growth-minded approach by taking responsibility for oversimplifying, providing firm but nonjudgmental feedback for those who got it wrong, and suggesting avenues for correction.
Dweck understands that change requires the abilities to identify, confront, and deconstruct, as well as proactively construct a new set of beliefs, practices, and responses to supplant the old ones. She takes an immersive and interactive approach toward teaching the necessary steps for lasting change in Chapter 8, modeling the traits and practices of the growth-minded teachers from Chapter 7. Dweck creates a firm-but-nurturing environment for the reader through her encouraging tone and by acknowledging the difficulty of the work. She offers empathy and encouragement by relating her own struggles to develop a growth mindset and signals that though failure and setbacks will occur, these are part of the process, not signs of innate flaws.
After building her environment, Dweck immerses readers in exercises and strategies that take them through proactive steps to building their own growth mindsets. Like a growth-minded teacher, Dweck anticipates reader struggles and misconceptions and provides feedback and encouragement strategically. She anticipates feelings of anxiety and the pressure to change overnight but likens the process to a journey. As a growth-oriented teacher, she provides a clear map to follow along the journey. Dweck’s confident tone and encouragement convey her belief that everyone can grow, change, and adopt healthier mindsets that will help them reach their potential and gain success in their endeavors.