49 pages • 1 hour read
John David AndersonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide contains a description of death and a traumatic work accident.
Anderson uses three narrators in Ms. Bixby’s Last Day. While each of the students is quite distinct, one thing all of them share is a life of futility. Topher describes himself as fading into the background of his family. His parents no longer pay more than three seconds worth of attention to any of his drawings. He perceives this trend of family disconnection to continue unabated and finds his refuge from it in the fantasy worlds he creates. Steve, on the other hand, lives beneath the perpetual vigilance of his perfectionistic parents, who view any grade below an A as a crisis. He feels constantly measured against and dominated by his older, driven sister and takes refuge by fleeing to Topher’s house to participate in his fantasies. Brand endures the deepening futility of a father who is physically unable to return to work and who has given up on the possibility of rehabilitation. Brand has become his caregiver, providing for all the household needs while his father sits before the television. Brand escapes into thoughts of abandoning his father, forcing him to care for himself. Beyond these real, seemingly hopeless examples, however, Anderson posits an even greater instance of futility: Maggie’s battle against pancreatic cancer. As Steve notes, the one-year survival rate for this lethal illness is only 25%. The five-year survival rate is only 10%. These high mortality rates are due to the fact that most cancers of this type have advanced before detection. The narrative uses these examples of futility to express the notion that many different people face futility of different degrees in disparate ways.
While the author hints early in the narrative that Maggie will not recover from the disease, the text does not suggest that people should surrender to the futility they experience, even if it appears to be insuperable. Rather, using the example of the three narrators, Anderson posits the idea that persistently resisting the most intractable forms of futility results in growth, wisdom, intimacy, and sometimes the defeat of the sources of futility. Symbolically, when the three narrators launch their quest to have one last party with their beloved Maggie, they become references to similar journeys. Anderson refers to Tolkien’s The Hobbit. Tolkien’s hero, Bilbo, superficially resembles the narrators. The author bears this out when the boys ask Maggie to finish reading them The Hobbit as they sit on a hilltop, listening to the conclusion of Bilboa’s adventure. Like the three wise men—or magi—whose story comes from Matthew 2:1-12 of the Christian Bible, the three sixth graders seek their chosen teacher in an attempt to bear those gifts she says she desires. Like the three narrators, the biblical magi end up getting turned around and needing help. They likewise encounter devious men who attempt to trick them, nevertheless outsmarting them.
Fueling the boys’ desire to persist in their quest are their unspoken, individual histories with Maggie. With each of the narrators, she interacts specifically in ways that addressed the futility that plagues them. They do not seek Maggie assuming that they bring a cure. As Brand points out, cheesecake cannot cure cancer. As Maggie has revealed to them, however, persistently working toward one’s goals in the face of the gravest futility yields hope, strength, fellowship, and sometimes success.
In Chapter 2, narrator Steve describes the occasion near the end of the school day when Maggie gathers her students in a circle and explains she has pancreatic cancer. Steve records that Topher gave him a mystified look, implying that he did not really grasp what Maggie was telling them. Some students asked questions and at least one girl began crying. Had those in the circle understood the gravity of what Maggie said, they might have responded differently. Their initial confusion is due to the fact that the concept of death is beyond of the experiential world of many early adolescents. The relative lethality of pancreatic cancer, as most adults readily understand, is far higher than with the majority of other forms of cancer. The narrative reveals the dread other adults feel about Maggie’s illness and prognosis beginning with Principal McNair, who, overwhelmed, leaves the class with many unanswered questions after explaining that Maggie is too sick to finish her last week. Brand overhears other teachers in the hallway talking about the seriousness of Maggie’s condition and the treatments she must undergo. Since death is a foreign concept, most students do not recognize the gravity of Maggie’s illness. The exception to this is Brand, whom Steve describes as hearing the news with an angry expression. Brand lost his mother when he was quite young and almost lost his father in an industrial accident. Only a few weeks before Maggie reveals her diagnosis, Brand’s father suffered another fall requiring hospitalization. From the outset Brand understands the concept of death and fears that Maggie will not survive.
While the other students have little concept of death, all of them respond to news of Maggie’s diagnosis with compassion and curiosity. The students quickly plan a farewell party intended for Maggie’s last day of instruction. When she proves too sick to return for her last week, all the students in her class make get well cards for her. The three narrators decide to visit her hospital room on Saturday, then adjust their plan to Friday upon learning Maggie is relocating to Boston. As is characteristic of Steve, he researches ductal adenocarcinoma and learns that Maggie’s possibility of survival is quite slim.
While Maggie and the other adults at Fox Ridge share minimal information with her students after her diagnosis, in the latter parts of the narrative, adults become more willing to offer information to the students. Maggie’s substitute, Ms. Brownlee, readily offers what news she has. After Maggie’s death, Principal McNair personally calls the families of her students going back five years. Brand’s father breaks the news to him gently, then suggests that the three narrators stay at Brand’s home that night for pizza in honor of Maggie. Anderson implies that early adolescents can deal successfully with grief, even the death of a beloved teacher, so long as adults share truths about death and dying with openness and transparency.
Topher records that he initially met Maggie when his family attended a circus where she performed as a local juggler. While her eccentric appearance and behavior might have caused Topher to remember her, what truly set her apart as someone Topher hoped to have as his teacher was the fact that she knew his name before he ever saw her. The author notes that Maggie was the clear choice for sixth grade students. While some might assume it is her free-spirited style of education and quirky appearance that the students warm up to, the reason most six graders want Maggie as their teacher is her practice of recognizing and empowering the uniqueness of each student. When Steve continues to challenge her assertion that destiny might play a role in bringing soul mates together, Maggie engages him with the insights of the one person whom Steve was certain to believe: Albert Einstein. After quoting Einstein, though, Maggie encourages Steve to reflect on and journal about his perception of their discussion. She senses Topher’s flagging self-esteem and surprises him by showing him her collection of his drawings that he had discarded but she pulled out of the trash. Her request to keep his drawings imply to Topher that he is worthy. Recognizing Brand’s isolation and feelings of abandonment, Maggie builds a unique relationship with him centered around weekly trips to the grocery store. Finally, she expresses the goodness she sees in him and encourages him to challenge his father to regain his health.
As the story progresses, Maggie shares the impetus for her desire and ability to empower her students through recognizing the uniqueness of each one. At a pivotal moment in her childhood, when she created an elaborate magic act, the main trick failed—through no fault of her own. The audience, her family, laughed in such a way that she felt ridiculed and immediately abandoned her dream of becoming a magician. As a teacher who desires to empower rather than discourage young people, Maggie acquires the ability to recognize the specialness of each of her students, giving herself the opportunity to accept and empower each child.
In the Epilogue, Topher recounts a prescient scene in which Maggie announces to her students that they will remember her after her death. She mentions her distinctive looks and teaching techniques, saying these students will tell their children about her. Her prophetic observation that her students would not forget her comes true not because of her eccentricities but because of her recognition of and response to the uniqueness of every student.
By John David Anderson