logo

19 pages 38 minutes read

Emily Dickinson

Much Madness is divinest Sense—

Fiction | Poem | Adult | Published in 1890

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Authorial Context: Debating Emily Dickinson’s “Madness”

As one of the most famous poets in Western culture, many people have written about Emily Dickinson, and their portrayals put her in the center of the battle of “Madness” Versus Sense. There is debate among scholars as to whether Dickinson’s decision to live in isolation starting in her mid-twenties—speaking only to close friends and family, and sometimes only behind closed doors—came from an intense dedication to her work or instead from a mental health condition like social anxiety or agoraphobia. In “Neither Mad Nor Motherless” (Charyn, Jerome. LitHub, 2016), Dickinson scholar Jerome Charyn notes John Cody’s book After Great Pain: The Inner Life of Emily Dickinson (1971). Charyn says Cody “presents Dickinson as a mental case whose only manner of survival was writing her cryptic and very private poems.”

He also quotes from Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar’s The Madwoman in the Attic (1979)—a canonical text about female writers from the 1800s. They call Dickinson “truly a madwoman (a helpless agoraphobic, trapped in a room in her father’s house)” (Gilbert & Gubar, 1979). As Dickinson didn’t “[a]ssent” (Line 6) to “the Majority” (Line 4), living a life other than the one expected of her—socializing, marrying, and having children—critics put her in a figurative “[c]hain” (Line 8) and posthumously bind her to a still unknown and unproven mental health condition. With the poem “Much Madness is divinest Sense,” it’s as if Dickinson anticipated how others would perceive her after her death.

Not every critic sees Dickinson’s behavior as due to poor mental health. In her collage-like appreciation of Dickinson, My Emily Dickinson (New Directions, 1985), Susan Howe says critics should note how gender can impact writers, adding, “That doesn’t mean I can relegate women to what we ‘should’ or ‘must’ be doing” (13). Howe sticks up for the nonconformist Dickinson and challenges Gilbert and Gubar’s depiction of the poet. Dickinson may not have acted how Gilbert and Gubar think an empowered woman should have behaved, but, according to Howe, that doesn’t mean Dickinson was experiencing a mental health condition: Instead, Dickinson chose to dedicate her life to reading and writing. As Howe declares, “Emily Dickinson’s religion was Poetry” (48).

In Emily Dickinson Face to Face (1932), Dickinson’s niece Martha Dickinson Bianchi sides with Howe and presents her aunt as a playful and humorous woman who purposely curtailed her in-person encounters so she could focus on her thoughts, sharpening her “discerning Eye” (Line 2). Bianchi also notes how people unfavorably judged Dickinson when she was alive due to her choices. Continuing debates over Dickinson’s mental health show how her work’s themes still apply to the mysterious poet long after her life and death.

Cultural Context: “Madness” in the 21st-Century Media

Dickinson’s poem applies to contemporary discourse about unreasonableness and sense, with critics and laypeople focusing on how the media landscape impacts a person’s idea of what is rational and what is senseless. Buzzwords like “post-truth” and “echo chamber” show how different forms of social media and major news organizations can foster majorities of their own making. If people “[d]emur” (Line 7) from the narratives they see and hear, they are perceived as threats and are “handled with a Chain” (Line 8).

Observing the media landscape, former President Barack Obama notes, “[I]f you are a Fox News viewer, you have an entirely different reality than if you are a New York Times reader” (Tatum, Sophie. “Obama says Fox News viewers, New York Times readers live in ‘entirely different’ realities.” CNN, 28 Nov. 2018). Conversely, former President Donald Trump has said the following about The New York Times: “The writers don’t even call asking for verification. They are totally out of control.” […] The New York Times reporting is false” (Grynbaum, Micheal M. and Eileen Sullivan. “Trump Attacks The Times, in a Week of Unease for the American Press.” The New York Times, 20 Feb. 2019). Fox News conveys mainly conservative viewpoints, while people cast the New York Times as mainly conveying leftist or liberal beliefs. A person can choose the media that reinforces their beliefs and cast the person who doesn’t agree as “mad.”

With social media, a person can curate their own majority by following accounts that reflect their beliefs and make them feel like they possess the “discerning Eye” (Line 2). Concerning the 2016 American presidential election, Canadian journalist and professor Ramona Pringle states, “Everyone saw a different reality, depending on their world views, which were amplified by social media’s tendency to reinforce people’s existing opinions” (“Social Media Is Blinding Us to Other Points of View.” CBC, 14 Nov. 2016). Social media networks add to the issue by showing users what they think they’ll like to keep them engaged and on the application platform.

Through the 21st-century media-saturated landscape, one can see how sense and senselessness carry a precarious fluidity. To avoid getting caught up in any majority, Dickinson's speaker might advise keeping away from social media, as its nonstop stream of images and opinions arguably represents “the starkest Madness” (Line 3)—or, less dramatically, not a reflective space that would allow one to develop a “discerning Eye” (Line 2).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text