44 pages • 1 hour read
Friedrich NietzscheA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
In the third essay, Nietzsche examines ascetic ideals, which include the values of self-discipline and self-denial, as the outcome of “slave morality” and the product of the influence of Christianity. All humans need to feel that their lives have an essential purpose; Nietzsche claims that ascetic ideals are the natural result of the desire for meaning.
Nietzsche uses the German composer Richard Wagner (See: Key Figures) as an example of an artist who succumbed to ascetic ideals, thereby denying and destroying his own talent. Wagner’s final opera Parsifal advocates for values like chastity and purity. Nietzsche seeks to understand how a talented musician could turn away from himself, a feature that Nietzsche claims is the inevitable result of the ascetic ideal. Artists always look beyond themselves for inspiration:
They have always been the servants of some morality, philosophy or religion, quite apart from the fact that unfortunately they have often been the sniveling courtiers of their clients and patrons, always courting the rich and powerful parties that are well established or ascendant (88).
Nietzsche suggests that artists often either look to morality or to their patrons for this source of inspiration. Wagner was inspired by philosophy and the idea that music was the sovereign art. The immense value he placed on music caused him to see himself as a priest of the discipline. Nietzsche argues that this is what happens when art is considered through the lens of the observer rather than through the lens of the artist. Art for the observer is too interested in perceptions of beauty and a denial of will; chastity and ascetic ideals emerge in the fruitless pursuit of perfect beauty, free from sensuality or sexuality.
Many philosophers seem to hold a hatred of sensuality. Nietzsche cites Arthur Schopenhauer (See: Key Figures), whom he claims saw sexuality as the enemy of his academic work. Self-discipline and self-denial were viewed as key to a deeply intellectual lifestyle, one marked by total independence, including independence from romantic and sexual relationships. Ascetic ideals create a framework for philosophers to live away from society and noise, allowing them to create and think more independently. Nietzsche argues that this is a trap: Ascetic ideals do not destroy sensuality. Instead, sensuality is forced to manifest as pride and power. Everything in modern life—including humans’ turn away from religion, the destruction of nature, and the development of science—is a testament to the pride of humanity. The more secure people feel in their purpose, the more damage they inflict upon themselves and others. Nietzsche cautions that one should never look at ascetic ideals as virtues, even if they lend the philosopher power or pride—they are merely values of a morality that has been shaped by personal need and societal context.
Since ascetic ideals created space for people to live more contemplative and thoughtful lives, it was natural that they would soon confront the meaninglessness of existence. Nietzsche explains that whenever humans feel pain, they need to blame something or someone. The easiest place to look is inward; humans begin to be suspicious of themselves and find refuge in asceticism once more. They become ascetic priests, developing systems of meaning that are brought to life through self-denial. Instead of focusing on meaninglessness, they turn their attention to their own errors and enter a cycle of continuously reflecting upon and correcting their own actions.
Nietzsche cautions that ascetic ideals turn life against itself. The ascetic priest is the enemy; he denies life while giving the illusion of affirming it. He obtains power from the sick and ailing by living among them and leading them. This only works if he is like them and believes in the meaning he teaches. When his followers begin to turn to their resentment toward one another, he redirects their anger toward their own failings. This is the origin of the concept of “sin.” Pleasure is found in giving and caring for others, developing a sense of community. This takes the focus away from the suffering and despair of existence and establishes human consciousness busily engaged in routine, self-assessment, and community. Life becomes interesting because it is enveloped in the drama of “the sinner” and the pursuit of heavenly reward.
Nietzsche then asks what this means as humans abandon religious belief. The philosopher predicts that as society moves away from religion, it will find it has found ascetic ideals in other disciplines. One area, argues Nietzsche, that has been pervaded by ascetic ideals is science. The reason for this is science’s continuous pursuit to uncover truth—a concept that Nietzsche argues does not exist with absolution.
Ascetic Ideals and the Priest are an important thematic focus in this essay. The story of Siddhartha Gautama, commonly known as The Buddha, is one of ascetic ideals. Most versions of Gautama’s childhood are described as a life of affluence and privilege in a royal family in present-day Nepal. Gautama shed this life of wealth to pursue an ascetic lifestyle, wishing to pursue the path of higher wisdom. The connection between religion and asceticism is thus an ancient one. Asceticism is a common feature of many religions, including Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, and Islam. In the Catholic Church, monks and nuns live a life of piety and prayer, sometimes in seclusion. Likewise, in Buddhism, monks observe detachment from worldly desires. Nietzsche argues that the ascetic ideal is the manifestation of the innate guilt of responsibility and the creditor/debtor relationship that pervades humanity. Although the average person may not choose to donate all their positions and live a life of chastity, poverty, and contemplation, ascetic ideals pervade moral structures at every level.
Nietzsche admits that asceticism is popular among philosophers. Artists and thinkers praise the impact of hermeticism and self-denial on their work. Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote prolifically while staying in a small cottage on his friend’s land. Henry David Thoreau devoted an entire book to a time of reflection and introspection at Walden Pond. Philosopher Immanuel Kant adhered to a strict regimen each day that he felt elevated his work. He woke up early every morning and went for a walk. In the evenings, he ate a frugal meal and avoided parties. Nietzsche calls out Kant directly for romanticizing the ascetic ideal.
Although a life of self-discipline and self-denial may make an individual more productive, Nietzsche argues that it is a rejection of the joy of existence: “It achieves its effect by diverting the attention of the sufferer from his suffering, keeping the consciousness occupied with ceaseless activity, so that there is little room left for suffering” (120). Ascetic ideals are useful because they distract from despair: Nietzsche argues that the reason Kant was so successful was that his strict routine kept him from facing his own suffering. Nietzsche calls ascetic ideals “life-denying,” claiming that they block people from accessing their fundamental selves and the life of The Free, Untamed Man.
The priest, as Nietzsche describes him, is one who believes in and lives according to ascetic ideals. The priest is both above and a member of his flock. Nietzsche embraces the sheep imagery of the Bible in its association with the Church. He argues that when people live according to bad conscience—making choices based on guilt and fear—then they are sick. The priest organizes the ill and presents them with an idealistic view of the world, one that can only be achieved through ascetic ideals.
When considered within the context of his first essay, Nietzsche presents a complex and disturbing image of how Ascetic Ideals and the Priest connect with power. The rise and dominance of Christianity in Western history is undisputed, but Nietzsche proposes that its success is largely due to Christianity’s ability to utilize morals to uphold socioeconomic systems. The Church and the aristocracy were intrinsically linked, so the morality that was packaged and sold by Christianity was one that submitted to the desires and needs of the nobility. Ascetic ideals ensured that the masses governed themselves. They put the needs of the community above themselves, thereby ensuring continued productivity and service. “Slave morality” instructed lower classes to live in humility and self-denial, keeping them from questioning their lots in life. Sin turned their gaze inward so they would not look to nobility as the source of their suffering.
Nietzsche is often associated with nihilism, and the ideas presented in the third essay may feel at times as though they confirm this idea. Nietzsche proposes that life is meaningless and that religion is a natural reaction to the pointlessness of existence. However, the philosopher feels it is important that individuals develop their own meaning, that they construct purpose and work from a wellspring of their own desire. Nietzsche argues that there is no such thing as good: “All good things were once bad things; every original sin has become an original virtue” (100). The only “good” is the conscience which affirms life. This means that the only good to be had in life is to live as The Free, Untamed Man, adhering to a personal set of values designed for pleasure.
By Friedrich Nietzsche