logo

67 pages 2 hours read

Alexei Navalny

Patriot

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 4-EpilogueChapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 4: “Prison”

Part 4, Chapter 19 Summary: “2021”

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death.

Part 4 begins with a short introduction written by an unnamed third party. Navalny’s imprisonment began in January 2021 after a court in Russia sentenced him to three and a half years in prison for violating parole in the Yves Rocher case. Additional charges followed, including a slander case against a war veteran stemming from Navalny’s criticism of participants in a government propaganda video. His imprisonment intensified with a nine-year sentence for embezzlement in 2022 and a 19-year sentence for extremism in 2023.

These trials took place in secretive conditions, often within prison facilities, excluding family and journalists. Navalny’s incarceration conditions worsened over time. Initially held with other inmates, he was soon isolated in solitary confinement and frequently sent to the punishment cell (SHIZO) for trivial infractions like an unbuttoned uniform. He endured nearly a year in these harsh cells and was denied visits, phone calls, and consistent access to writing materials. His health suffered due to limited medical care, prompting a 24-day hunger strike in March 2021, eventually forcing authorities to allow doctors to see him. In December 2023, Navalny disappeared from prison without notice. After weeks of uncertainty, his family learned that he had been transferred to a remote Arctic Circle prison. On February 16, 2024, Navalny “was killed” under undisclosed circumstances (280).

During his imprisonment, Navalny kept a personal diary, documenting life inside the prison and encounters with guards, lawyers, and prison officials. He humorously recounts psychological evaluations and mocks the absurdities of prison bureaucracy. His diary also captures personal reflections, his determination to stay mentally active, and his emotional responses to “an enormous stack of mail” from supporters (288). In dated entries, beginning on January 21, 2021, Navalny explains how he finds solace in reading literature, exchanging messages with his wife, and receiving care packages despite constant surveillance and restrictions.

His entries detail moments of emotional support, like strangers shouting encouragement from nearby cells. He also expresses frustration over the state-controlled media’s portrayal of him and the harsh treatment his family endures, including police raids on their home. Despite the grim reality, Navalny maintains his resolve and sense of humor, crafting survival strategies from making creative meals to finding joy in the simplest routines. Navalny highlights the resilience of the human spirit and his unwavering belief in the possibility of a freer, democratic Russia. His diary remains a testament to his enduring fight against corruption and repression, even under brutal conditions and amid the “absurdity of the situation” (306).

Navalny describes mornings filled with rushed preparations, transport in police vans, and invasive searches. Court hearings are depicted as farcical, with biased judges and theatrical prosecutors manipulating cases. In prison, Navalny endures bureaucratic regulations, including waking routines, random searches, and limited access to basic amenities. He creatively navigates restrictive conditions, improvising meals and managing correspondence. The prison environment is harsh yet filled with ironic encounters, such as failed attempts at making pancakes on TV and whimsical efforts to invent new recipes with fellow inmates.

As conditions worsen, Navalny is transferred between various facilities, each progressively more oppressive. In the “friendly concentration camp” of Pokrov Penal Colony 2 (354), strict surveillance and dehumanizing routines dominate life. Cameras are omnipresent, and rules are enforced with military precision, emphasizing obedience and psychological control. Despite this, interactions with guards and inmates reveal occasional humanity and shared frustrations. Health issues arise, notably debilitating back pain incurred from the tabata regime on the day of his arrest, prompting futile requests for medical attention. Visits from lawyers and brief exchanges with cellmates provide some relief, while harsh conditions persist. Navalny reflects on political struggles, using courtroom speeches to denounce systemic corruption and advocate for justice.

Throughout, the narrative oscillates between grim realities and philosophical musings. Navalny maintains a sense of humor and purpose, drawing strength from personal beliefs, memories, and letters from supporters. His reflections on truth, justice, and resilience underscore a deep commitment to enduring hardship while resisting oppression. The entries document his struggles with severe back pain, lack of medical treatment, and harsh prison conditions. 

Despite multiple requests, he is denied access to proper healthcare, receiving only minimal treatment like ibuprofen. His physical health deteriorates, leading to numbness in his legs and severe pain. At the same time, Navalny faces relentless psychological pressure from prison authorities, including petty reprimands for minor infractions such as wearing a T-shirt to a lawyer meeting. The guards enforce strict discipline, frequently waking him at night and monitoring his every move. His protests, including a hunger strike demanding adequate medical care, result in intensified scrutiny and fabricated accusations by prison officials.

Throughout the diary, Navalny reflects on his mental and physical endurance. He shares his strategies for coping, including memorizing the Sermon on the Mount and exercising despite his worsening condition. His religious reflections offer moments of solace, particularly when a fellow prisoner silently gives him a small religious icon, symbolizing solidarity. Navalny describes life in the prison with vivid detail, including the manipulation by prison “activists” (407), mandatory propaganda sessions, and orchestrated efforts to discredit his hunger strike. The hunger strike results in Navalny losing a huge amount of weight; he nearly dies from the protest, which is moderately successful. 

He also highlights the camaraderie among prisoners, despite the toxic environment created by the administration’s divide-and-rule tactics. His imprisonment escalates with new charges, including accusations of creating an extremist organization, destabilizing the state, and contempt of court. Despite these legal battles, he maintains his resolve, supported by global advocacy and personal resilience.

Family visits become rare, precious moments. Navalny cherishes even brief encounters with his wife, Yulia, contrasting them with the loneliness of prison life. He reflects on everyday experiences, from the comfort of sharing a meal to the absurdity of prison routines. These moments underscore his humanity amidst dehumanizing conditions. 

The year 2021 closes with reflections on perseverance and hope. Navalny draws strength from international support and his faith in justice. Despite continuous adversity, he resolves to keep fighting for his beliefs and vows not to let his supporters down, seeing his imprisonment as part of a broader struggle for justice and freedom.

Part 4, Chapter 20 Summary: “2022”

On January 17, a year after returning to Russia and being arrested upon arrival, Navalny reflects on the courage of honest people who resist fear despite repression. He emphasizes that defying fear, not honesty, is what authoritarian regimes fear most. Recalling his own arrest and subsequent imprisonment, he expresses pride in his resistance and encourages others to overcome fear for the sake of a just future. 

Throughout his imprisonment, Navalny faces relentless persecution, which he documents in his diary entries and Instagram posts. He receives new criminal charges and experiences a highly controlled and oppressive prison environment. Despite isolation, he remains defiant, recognizing that the “dotards and thieves” want to silence him while acknowledging the enduring power of truth (424). 

As war in Ukraine escalates, he condemns the Russian government’s lies and propaganda, drawing historical parallels to the doomed Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. He criticizes state-run media for inciting war and calls for accountability for propagandists, whom he labels as complicit in war crimes. He also denounces the Kremlin’s attempts to manipulate public opinion through blatant deceit.

Navalny reflects on personal struggles, particularly missing family milestones due to imprisonment. His son’s birthday prompts a renewed commitment to building a better future for coming generations. He recounts everyday prison life, including clearing snow in harsh conditions, illustrating the inhumane and absurd aspects of his confinement. As time passes, Navalny endures increasing repression, including repeated stints in the SHIZO (punishment cell), where conditions are “extremely severe” (433). He describes the extreme deprivation, constant surveillance, and psychological torment designed to break prisoners’ spirits. Despite these hardships, he remains resilient, using limited resources for intellectual pursuits, such as reading history and practicing meditation.

Legal persecution intensifies with new charges, including accusations of terrorism and extremism, stemming from his political activism. His prison conditions worsen as authorities label him a “persistent offender” (442), subjecting him to further isolation and denying him family visits. Despite this, he maintains a sense of purpose, urging continued opposition to authoritarianism. Navalny details Kafkaesque prison bureaucracy and petty vindictiveness from guards, such as denying him winter boots, which exacerbates his suffering during harsh winters. He interprets such tactics as deliberate attempts to weaken him but remains determined not to capitulate. 

Despite “the cunning and thoughtfulness of the penitentiary pressure system” (447), Navalny preserves his hope and defiance. He urges supporters to resist apathy and continue the struggle for freedom, knowing that speaking out, even from prison, undermines the regime’s efforts to silence dissent. He urges his audience to “bring Russia closer to freedom” (448).

Part 4, Chapter 21 Summary: “2023”

Navalny continues to share his reflections and experiences during his imprisonment in Russia. Through his increasingly sporadic and intermittent diary entries and social media posts, he narrates various aspects of life in confinement, focusing on psychological and physical challenges, political repression, and his enduring spirit of resistance. These entries include the following.

January 12: Navalny shares a unique story about a “lunatic” inmate deliberately placed in a cell opposite his (450), yelling obscenities for hours each day. He suspects this was orchestrated by authorities as a form of psychological torture. He emphasizes the calculated cruelty of the Russian prison system, controlled by sadistic officials.

January 17: Marking two years since his return to Russia and subsequent arrest, Navalny reflects on his unwavering commitment to opposing the “miserable, exhausted” regime (451). Despite personal suffering, he reiterates his belief in fighting for a better Russia.

February 20: Navalny outlines his political platform in 15 points. He condemns Russia’s war against Ukraine, driven by President Putin’s imperial ambitions. He advocates ending the war, recognizing Ukraine’s borders, compensating for damages, and dismantling Putin’s regime through free elections, fostering democracy, and integrating Russia into Europe.

March 8: Navalny honors Liliya Chanysheva, a political ally facing prosecution for her activism. He recounts her courageous leadership in Bashkortostan, battling corruption and mobilizing public opposition, despite severe risks.

March 15: Navalny reacts to the documentary Navalny winning an Academy Award. He credits the filmmakers, the investigators, and his team, dedicating his involvement to people resisting dictatorship and war worldwide.

June 4: On his birthday, Navalny reflects on his resilience. Despite frequent solitary confinement and harsh conditions, he maintains hope and gratitude for supporters and fellow political prisoners. He keeps “cracking jokes” in spite of his difficult conditions (458).

June 19: Navalny sarcastically notes his accumulation of unique court trials held in increasingly restrictive locations. He interprets these secretive trials as proof of the regime’s fear of his words.

August 4: After receiving a 19-year sentence, Navalny declares that he is prepared for a life-long struggle against the regime. He calls on others not to lose the will to resist Putin’s oppressive government.

September 27: Navalny is moved to the “strictest possible punishment” (460): the solitary confinement of the EPKT for a year. He compares this grim milestone to reaching the bottom of a prison hierarchy.

October 19: Navalny condemns the arrest of his legal team on fabricated charges. He praises their professionalism and urges fellow lawyers to defend human rights and resist government intimidation.

November 13: Navalny humorously reflects on his wife Yulia’s censored letters, which authorities bizarrely deem criminal evidence, underscoring the absurdity of the prison censorship system.

December 1: Navalny learns of new criminal charges against him while in solitary confinement. He sarcastically calls his confinement a hub of “vibrant social and political life” (463), underscoring the regime’s paranoid attempts to suppress him.

December 6: Navalny describes enduring petty administrative harassment, such as denied dental care. He views these provocations as psychological tests of his patience and inner resilience.

December 26: Transferred to a penal colony above the Arctic Circle, Navalny likens himself to a Russian Santa Claus due to his winter gear and snowy surroundings. Despite the harsh journey and isolation, he maintains a positive outlook.

December 31: Navalny shares a reflective New Year’s Eve message, expressing deep longing for his family and friends while maintaining hope for the future. He urges everyone to stay honest and committed to justice in the coming year while living “a little better and more honest in the coming year” (467).

Part 4, Chapter 22 Summary: “2024”

On January 9, 2024, Navalny reflects on his harsh treatment in the Russian prison system, particularly in the SHIZO. After a brief quarantine, he is punished again for supposedly failing to comply with prison regulations. His daily “exercise” starts at 6:30 am (468). During the polar night, temperatures are as low as -32°C (-25.6°F). Despite the freezing conditions, he forces himself to walk outside, imagining survival tactics from the film The Revenant, though noting that even extreme measures would be futile in such cold. 

On January 17, Navalny marks three years since his return to Russia and subsequent arrest. He frequently faces the same question from prisoners and prison officials: “Why did you come back?” (469). He expresses frustration with both his inability to explain himself clearly and the Russian political culture’s ingrained cynicism, which makes straightforward motives seem implausible. He rejects conspiracy theories suggesting hidden motives or deals with the Kremlin.

Navalny asserts that his return was a matter of principle: He could not abandon his country or his beliefs. He emphasizes that genuine convictions require sacrifices, including imprisonment if necessary. His political journey involved promising Russian voters that he would not deceive or abandon them. By returning, he “fulfilled [his] promise” (471), showing that not everyone in Russia is willing to lie or flee. He outlines his core beliefs: Power should change through free elections, legal systems should be fair, and censorship and corruption must end. These principles are grounded in reason and historical experience, he says. 

In contrast, he describes Russia’s current rulers as self-serving hypocrites clinging to power. They mask their corruption and authoritarianism with shifting ideologies, presenting themselves as patriots and moral leaders despite their actions. 

Navalny concludes with a message of hope, asserting that the current oppressive regime is unsustainable and will eventually collapse. Despite personal hardship, he remains resolute, urging others to hold fast to their beliefs. He believes that victory over tyranny is inevitable.

Epilogue Summary

On March 22, 2022, Navalny receives a new nine-year prison sentence under “strict regime” conditions. Before the verdict, he and his lawyers bet on the length of the sentence, with predictions ranging from seven to 15 years. Navalny wins the bet with his guess of seven to eight years. Despite the harsh reality of the sentence—longer than most murder convictions in Russia—he maintains his composure through what he calls “prison Zen” (473).

Returning to prison, he notices fellow inmates and guards observing his reaction, expecting despair or anger. However, Navalny stays calm, acknowledging that he always anticipated that his imprisonment might last for life, either as long as the regime survives or until his own death. He criticizes wishful thinking about the collapse of authoritarian regimes, noting how resilient systems like North Korea, Cuba, and China have been despite international pressure and internal crises.

Navalny rejects relying on uncertain hopes for freedom. He recalls expecting release only if international pressure worked within six months of his arrest. When that did not happen, he adjusted his mindset, choosing to focus on his principles rather than despair. He remains committed to fighting authoritarianism from within prison, constantly strategizing how to undermine the regime. Navalny shares two mental strategies that help him endure. The first involves imagining the worst-case scenario—spending life in prison, dying forgotten, and being buried in an unmarked grave—and accepting it. This helps him avoid anger or despair. He compares his situation to the tragic fates of innocent people in wars or prisons, noting that his sacrifices were voluntary, unlike the people who were “just living their lives” (477).

The second strategy is faith. Although not overtly religious, Navalny reflects on Christian values, including sacrifice, the immortality of the soul, and reliance on a higher power. He finds comfort in surrendering his worries to God, trusting that justice will ultimately prevail. Navalny also discusses a personal conversation with his wife, Yulia, during her first extended prison visit. He confides that he might never be released and could be killed if the regime collapses. Yulia calmly acknowledges this possibility, reinforcing Navalny’s belief that he found the right partner. They agree to hope for the best but prepare for the worst. 

Despite the harsh reality, Navalny emphasizes acceptance over despair. He acknowledges that self-deception can creep in, with an inner voice whispering that things might improve. However, he chooses to focus on what he can control: his beliefs, actions, and inner peace. Through these methods, Navalny sustains hope and strength, determined not to let imprisonment break his spirit.

Part 4-Epilogue Analysis

Part 4 begins with the only instance of third-person narration in Patriot. In a short introduction, an unnamed narrator provides context for what follows. After his arrest, Navalny is thrown in prison. He is only able to communicate via his lawyers, who receive writing intended for his book or comments to be posted to Instagram. This short introduction also contains the information that Navalny was killed in prison in unknown circumstances. Much as the book itself begins with the story of Navalny’s poisoning before delving into his past, Part 4 mirrors this structure by beginning with the announcement of his death and allowing this information to color the entries that follow, emphasizing Navalny’s commitment to The Battle Against Authoritarianism until the very end. 

Each diary entry, therefore, is imbued with a sense of foreboding. When Navalny mentions his health troubles, the way in which he is being tortured by an uncaring prison system, and his hope for the future, the audience reads this knowing that he will never be released from the Russian prison system. There is a tragedy to Navalny’s declarations of love, especially knowing that he will not be reunited with his wife. There is a bitterness to his praise of the guards, knowing that they contributed to his death. In this sense, the posthumous publication of Navalny’s book plays into the same emotional appeal that marked his political activism: He wants the audience to understand the government for what it truly is, exposing the cruelty and corruption that has sentenced him to continuous hardships in prison.

Part 4 implements a necessary change in format. The extended prose of the earlier parts of the book are no longer possible since Navalny is writing from increasingly oppressive environments. The change in format tracks the way in which the prisons become more oppressive. Each time he is transferred, he is given fewer freedoms. Not only does he have fewer writing materials, but he also has fewer incidents to share with his audience. When Navalny is trapped alone in solitary confinement, for example, there is little to tell his audience about other than sharing his thoughts on the state of politics in a society he is no longer allowed to take part in. Everything is conveyed through Navalny’s lawyers, right up until the moment when his posts stop. The last post comes just over a month before his death; the silence is foreboding and final. At last, Navalny has been silenced, and this silence is damning for the government.

Since Navalny had no way of predicting his death, the final entry in the Epilogue is taken from more than a year earlier. This post is not tied to a specific incident or time. Rather, it is chosen because it functions as a call to The Enduring Hope for Democratic Reform. Even amid his incarceration, even as he misses his wife, Navalny retains his optimism. The final paragraph of Patriot is Navalny’s most explicit declaration of his faith, illustrating how he is able to maintain his optimism in the face of near-constant oppression. 

As with the earlier structural decisions to foreshadow poisoning and death, this final chapter and its rallying cry have been shadowed throughout the text. In the face of everything, Navalny has urged the audience to join him in his fight. He argues that the fight is bigger than just himself, adopting the religious overtures that inspire him in difficult times. In this final entry, Navalny takes to the pulpit and shows his audience that—in spite of the brutality of the authoritarian government—they should never give up their demand for change. If anything, the brutality of the government is exactly why they should never give up. Navalny ends the book as it began: with a declaration of his indomitable demand for change.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text