48 pages • 1 hour read
Ann PatchettA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
This theme is an important proposition that Ann Patchett develops over the course of Run, suggesting to readers vast differences in the effects of legacies and stories in the life of a family. Through plot development and Kenya’s characterization, Patchett shows how the Doyle family’s legacy is changed—even strengthened—when certain family stories fade.
In Chapter 1, Bernadette shares her family story about the Virgin Mary with Doyle. His remark about the statue’s resemblance to Bernadette makes her want to look at the statue differently, to change all that she knows is associated with the heirloom via story: “Bernadette cocked her head and tried to divorce herself from her history. She tried to see it as something new. ‘It’s art,’ she said. ‘It’s me. Pretend she’s naked’” (4). Thinly veiled by her joke, Bernadette hints to Doyle about the negative motivations and emotions associated with the heirloom’s origin story. However, Bernadette’s hints only pique Doyle’s interest in hearing the story, which she attempts to forestall: “My mother never told you this story? […] She’s afraid of boring you. […] It’s a sad story” (4). Simultaneously, Patchett uses Bernadette’s stalling to pique the reader’s interest. Though Bernadette relays the tale to Doyle, she hesitates again after revealing Billy Lovell’s lie about the statue’s origins: “‘Things go downhill from here,’ Bernadette said. ‘There’s no redemption’” (10). Not only does her family keep the stolen statue, they pass it down through four generations alongside its story; this not only perpetuates negative family behaviors associated with the statue, it preserves the difficult emotions connected to the statue’s entrance into her family.
Bernadette’s feelings about the story’s associations return to the narrative when she ashamedly thinks about her habit of praying to the statue: “[it] never failed to make her feel selfish and childish” (13). “Selfish” and “childish” are adjectives that also describe the motivations and emotions of Billy and Doreen Lovell in the context of her family’s story; they also describe her family members’ historical behavior toward the statue, jealously coveting it from their sisters. Bernadette’s sister, Serena, tries to justify taking the statue from Doyle, who does not have a daughter: “‘[S]ince we have daughters,’ Serena said, she was the older of the two, ‘and the statue always passes on to a daughter—’” (2). Although Patchett’s narrator does not directly explain Bernadette’s desire to distance herself from her family’s story, context clues indicate that, for the sake of her husband and children, she seeks to separate her family’s legacy (the statue) from the stories and historical emotions attached to them.
Patchett enacts this separation following Bernadette’s death, fading the statue’s association with Billy and Doreen. She does this to show that the family’s legacy need not remain permanently attached to the Sullivan family’s story; the legacy, an object, is thus freed to hold new emotional associations, a point that drives the plot and leaves the novel with a sense of hope (though ambiguous). Following Bernadette’s death, neither Doyle nor the narrator repeat her family’s story about the statue. This suggests that the Virgin Mary statue takes on new meanings after this event: Without the story’s reiteration, the statue has renewed emotional associations. Readers see this in the comfort found by Tip and Teddy during childhood as they pray for their mother to the statue every night. The statue’s likeness to Bernadette is also comforting to the boys and Doyle alike, standing atop the boys’ dresser long after they move out. Kenya finds similar comfort in its presence after Tennessee’s accident. Finally, “divorced” from Bernadette’s family history, the statue’s beauty palliates those new to seeing it, rather than exciting envy: “[Kenya] saw that lovely statue with her arms open wide and saw how the light painted the side of the woman’s face and made the halo shining on the back of her head seem almost like a living thing” (158). The “arms wide open” reflect a new family legacy of welcome.
Kenya eventually receives the statue from Doyle for her 12th birthday. Through the statue’s new context and Kenya’s characterization, Patchett shows the once ominous Doyle family legacy take on new, hopeful dimensions.
Sentimental novels share similar themes with Run, often featuring family-focused plots that champion emotion over reason. Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852), for example, portrays a character who liberates herself from slavery to save her son (this novel has notably been criticized for its representations of racist stereotypes). However, Patchett does not merely recycle this theme, rather complicates it in ways suited to a 21st-century American imagination. By incorporating a historically resonant theme, Patchett uses her novel to express sentimentalism’s idealistic drive to care for others in inclusive ways that reflect contemporary American culture.
Sentimental novels celebrate emotion and feeling over reason; they became popular in Europe and America during the 18th and 19th centuries in response to rationalism. Its stories often focus on parental bravery and the extremes to which mothers will go to protect their children. In Run, Patchett updates this theme through key scenes of character development, particularly those involving conflict between characters and their loved ones whom they try to protect. Before Chapter 3, for example, Tennessee hid Kenya from the Doyles, and she withholds that she took the name of Kenya’s biological mother. Her old friend and Kenya’s mother, Tennessee Alice Moser, scolds her for this: “You didn’t have to turn her whole life into a big secret” (201). Though Tennessee positively embodies this theme when she leaps in front of a car to save Tip, Patchett complicates the issue when exploring its more negative ends in the relationship between Tennessee and Kenya.
Similarly, Bernard Doyle misguidedly protects his sons with lies, creating or threatening disasters in their own and others’ lives. Doyle lies after Sullivan’s car accident, and he lies to prevent the brothers’ jealousy over Kenya receiving the Virgin Mary statue. When speaking to Sullivan about Doyle, Tennessee advocates for Sullivan’s father: “He meant to protect you” (155). Patchett hence creates thematic parallels between Tennessee and Doyle: Much as Tennessee hides in reaction to emotionally dangerous situations, Doyle lies in response. Patchett uses these characterizations to complicate this theme and challenge as well as uphold sentimentality’s defense of emotions over logic. Unlike the conventions of sentimental novels, Patchett does not didactically justify guardians’ extreme behaviors when it comes to protection; instead, she presents characters’ choices to create rounded characterization and leaves the appraisal of their character to readers.
Patchett further complicates this historically informed theme by not exonerating her characters or fully restoring all their relationships: Tennessee Moser dies of her injuries before explaining anything to Kenya; Doyle is not much closer to Sullivan at the novel’s end. Patchett initially introduces protecting loved ones as a common value that the main characters share. As the novel’s plot develops, this theme is complicated through additional revelations about Patchett’s characters.
Each of the characters in the novel exhibits different economic or social privileges, or lack thereof. Those with privilege in the novel are frequently unaware; Patchett adopts this proposition as a theme to highlight the growth of two main characters, Doyle and Tip.
Patchett introduces this theme in Chapter 3 through the juxtaposition of concurrent, narrative action between Doyle’s and Kenya’s experiences of the aftermath of the car accident. Police speak with Doyle as the ambulance carrying Tennessee prepares to leave, and EMTs refuse to transport Kenya with her mother. Patchett’s narrator mediates: “They had left the black girl with the two young black men who didn’t know her. After all, they looked like they belonged together. She wasn’t hurt, she wasn’t alone. They didn’t think another thing about her” (48). Patchett relays this scene through Kenya’s point of view, highlighting both her plight and Doyles’ obliviousness to her difficulties. An ongoing argument between Doyle and a policeman occupies him as Kenya struggles: “Couldn’t you just take us all over to the hospital?” (49). Although the Doyle family mean Kenya no harm, Patchett introduces a character who is unaware of his privilege (Doyle) through a narrator who is aware and highlights the different lives of the Mosers and Doyles. The theme is reinforced by relaying action in this scene through Kenya’s perspective.
Run directly addresses characters’ ignorance of privilege through the main characters’ evolving relationships. The story proposes that benefits in common growth and happiness can come from awareness, which Patchett shows through the Doyle family getting to know Kenya. Tip, for example, the most aloof of the Doyles, shows the most development in his later scenes with Kenya. When Tip learns that Kenya and Tennessee regularly attend the same lectures as Doyle and his sons, he thinks: “Maybe there was a way Tip and Kenya had similar childhoods after all” (219). However, showing his ignorance, their similarities are not as he imagines. For example, in Chapter 9, the narrator intersperses the characters’ conversation about the fish in Tip’s lab with asides describing his fond childhood memories of learning about fish at Walden Pond. He soon realizes that Kenya has never been there and invites Kenya to make an educational fieldtrip there with him in the spring. Through Tip’s point of view, this chapter shows his character’s process of gaining awareness of privilege, and then leveraging his privilege for Kenya’s benefit.
By Ann Patchett