53 pages • 1 hour read
George EliotA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Silas is the eponymous protagonist, but the novel is not necessarily about his exploits as an individual. Instead, the plot is predicated on his proximity to other people. This proximity can be broken down into three distinct phases. First, he is exiled from the community at Lantern Yard. This experience leaves him jaded and bitter. Second, he lives on the periphery of the community of Raveloe. This experience becomes a search for self-meaning, as he replaces the social parts of his existence with work and money. Third, he is gradually accepted into the community through the community’s empathy over his suffering and his lasting good nature. Silas’s proximity to the community emphasizes the importance of social interaction during his era. In the early 19th century, villages, towns, and cities provided an important structure for existence in the form of material and social support networks. Neighbors rely on one another to get by and, because he consciously rejects this form of community, Silas is considered strange. The way in which other characters perceive Silas’s rejection of community is indicative of the importance of these support networks. Many people in Raveloe depend on these networks to survive, either through acts of charity from the wealthy or the outreach from the church. Silas wants neither, seemingly rejecting not just the community but everything that the community represents. In turn, the community rejects Silas. In effect, a perpetual spiral of rejection is created in which the community distrusts Silas and Silas distrusts the community.
Silas’s rejection of community at the beginning of the novel is informed by his experiences. In Lantern Yard, he was a member of a religious community that later betrayed and exiled him. The sense of identity and purpose that the community gave Silas was ripped away from him in an unfair fashion. Rather than blaming individuals, he blames the concept of community itself. His entrance into the second phase on the periphery of the Raveloe community is a conscious action, emphasizing his desire not to be hurt again. By limiting himself to the periphery, he limits how much people can hurt him. His rejection is a defensive action, and he tries to fill the void in his life with something else. Silas works hard at his loom. He hopes that his hard work—and, in particular, the money that it brings—will fill the void in his life that has been left by his rejection of community. Each night, he counts his money as though he is attempting to quantify his own success and personal value. Each coin is an additional token of validation. When he is the victim of theft, however, Silas is shown the error of his ways. The community takes pity on him and comes to his aid; he failed to replace the support network in his life, but only through his suffering and his pain could he be shown the error of his ways. Through the acceptance of this community, he relearns the value of companionship and support. Furthermore, this acceptance in Raveloe helps to heal the feelings of pain following the rejection Silas experienced in Lantern Yard.
Finally, Eppie’s arrival shows Silas the real importance of community. When he adopts her, he signals that he no longer wants to be alone. He tried to fill the void in his life with work and money only for that to be taken away from him. Eppie’s arrival makes Silas vulnerable. He has no idea how to raise a child, and he relies on the community for help. They provide help and, in turn, he is integrated into the community. Silas returns to the fold and, through Eppie’s love, he is shown the importance of community on a broader scale. He is able to fully heal for the first time since leaving Lantern Yard. Silas’s journey functions as an endorsement of the importance of communities as social networks, and it also highlights the harm that can be inflicted when a community rejects a person. Had Silas’s life continued without the arrival of Eppie, and he would have likely lived on the fringes of community for the rest of his life, ultimately dying alone and unhappy. While there is great joy to be found in a community’s acceptance, there is bitterness to be found in a community’s rejection. Silas experiences both throughout the novel in a cyclic nature, thus highlighting the impact that community has on life in negative and positive ways depending on whether or not one is accepted.
Religion plays an important role in Silas Marner. Over the course of his life, Silas loses his religion and then recovers it with the help of others. During this time, he is exposed to vastly different forms of religion in terms of both doctrine and practice. His earlier memories concern Lantern Yard, a small and very devoutly religious community in which he is expected to pray regularly and donate large portions of his wages to the chapel. Silas is a faithful man. He believes that God is not only benevolent but also omnipresent. When Silas is accused of theft, he accepts the suggestion that the community should draw lots. He believes that God will intervene and prove his innocence. When this does not happen, Silas takes the lack of divine intervention as evidence that God—or, at the very least, his interpretation of God—may not exist. The reality is that Silas has been betrayed by his friend. Rather than representing evidence of any kind of supernatural order, the drawing of lots is evidence of the fallibility of man. Silas’s early experiences with religion are related to the reader by the narrator, who has the benefit of omniscience and knows what Silas does not: His loss of faith was manufactured by disloyal friends and should not be considered evidence of anything further. Nevertheless, Silas takes the exile seriously and abandons any form of religious practice.
In Raveloe, Silas encounters a very different kind of religion. Dolly occasionally sits with Silas and listens to his stories about Lantern Yard. She is shocked by his experiences, unable to reconcile the demanding religion of the chapel with the community-driven nature of her own local church. Life in Raveloe, the narrator points out, is much easier than in the darker, gloomier north. In Raveloe, food is abundant, and the people do not need to work so hard. Accordingly, their religion takes on a more relaxed tone. While they might be similar in a broad doctrinal sense, the religions of Lantern Yard’s chapel and Raveloe’s church are strikingly different in tone and practice. In Raveloe, the church is the center of the community. It functions as the intersection between social classes, the place where the Cass family mingles with everyone else. Even the Rainbow is divided along class lines, but everyone attends the same church. Silas is only able to come to terms with this new form of religion once he accepts the idea of community back into his life. His adoption of Eppie and his integration into the community is marked by his attendance at the local church. The acceptance of God is the acceptance of the Raveloe way of life; religion functions as symbolic shorthand for social integration.
Though the characters rarely discuss their religion with one another, the narrator provides personal insight into individual beliefs. One of the most important examples of individual belief comes from Nancy. After losing a child, she struggles with the decision of whether or not she and her husband should adopt. According to Nancy’s personal interpretation of religion, to adopt would be to interfere with God’s plan. The narrator notes that she has not received any specific instruction to inform this idea from a priest or a teacher. She has taken it on for herself and, because of her belief, Godfrey does not make a move to adopt Eppie until she is much older. Nancy’s personal interpretation of religion is tolerated by the community as she keeps it to herself. Characters such as Nancy—and even Silas as he struggles with his faith—demonstrate how religion is much more personal than it was in bygone eras. By this time, characters feel a need to form a personal doctrine that governs their existence. Nancy is sincere in her belief and in her personal connection with God, demonstrating that religion is much more than just a community project.
The social class structure of Raveloe is clearly defined and very rigid. The secluded, rural area is divided into a hierarchal social structure with the wealthy at the top, essentially ruling over the working-class people. The Cass family, for example, is the wealthiest in the area. Squire Cass is presumed to be the de facto governor, as he is the owner of large swathes of land in the region. Rent is paid to Squire Cass by the people working the land, making him richer while reinforcing the social hierarchy by denying the working-class people an opportunity to own their land or homes. The social structure of the community is evident in the pub, the Rainbow. The pub is divided into two rooms, one for the wealthy patrons and one for the working-class patrons. The division allows the wealthy elite to segregate themselves from the working-class people and thus functions as a constant reminder of the divisions that are extant in the society.
Social class does not only determine where a person drinks. The wealthy elites are protected from consequences due to their resources and their social statuses. Upper-class men such as Dunsey and Godfrey routinely commit crimes and act in an immoral fashion. Dunsey blackmails his brother, steals from Silas, and kills his brother’s horse. After killing the horse, he simply walks away and leaves the matter for someone else to deal with. He acts in this manner because he never fears any retribution from the law. His status and his wealth imbue him with a sense of privilege and entitlement. Since his father garnishes rent from his tenants in the village, Dunsey views Silas’s money in the same way. Silas’s money is his by right, so Dunsey takes it without a second thought. In a similar way, Godfrey commits many transgressions. He marries Molly and keeps their marriage a secret. He also helps Dunsey to embezzle the tenants’ rent money. Godfrey does not fear retribution from the law or any other institution. He fears his father’s judgment and the way this might affect his status or inheritance. The social status of upper-class men like Godfrey and Dunsey protects them from the consequences of their actions, demonstrating how such rigid systems of social hierarchy lead to an unjust and unfair society in which the law is not applied equally to rich and poor alike.
At the end of the novel, Eppie is given the opportunity to move from her working-class status to an upper-class status. Though she has been raised by Silas in a working-class community, Godfrey believes that she possesses some innate distinction that marks her as a social elite. He believes that she should naturally be able to ascend to his class status, offering her wealth and comfort to come with him even though he abandoned her many years before. Silas acknowledges the benefits that will follow if Eppie chooses to go with Godfrey. Her biological father can offer her far more in a material sense than Silas ever could. The rigid class structure in Raveloe is such that few people are able to move between social classes. Even those that do move between classes—such as Mr. Lammeter—have some vestigial distinction that marks them as different from the other social elites. (Mr. Lammeter rents his farm, for example.) As such, the opportunity offered to Eppie by Godfrey is remarkable in its rarity. Nevertheless, Eppie chooses to stay with Silas. Her decision is a validation of working-class values and a declaration that wealth are not the only indications of success or happiness. Eppie does not need to be upper class to be happy. She prefers to remain working class in a loving home than to be rich and powerful in the house of the father who abandoned her. Eppie’s decision rebukes social class by siding with the disenfranchised working-class people over the privileged, arrogant elites.
By George Eliot