69 pages • 2 hours read
Andrzej SapkowskiA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Sword of Destiny, the fundamental role of witchers, particularly Geralt of Rivia, is to protect humanity from monsters. However, a paradox unfolds as the narrative evolves, revealing that the greatest threat to humans comes not from external threats such as dragons and basilisks, but from humanity itself. The tales within the collection illuminate a distinct shift in the perceived danger, emphasizing the insular nature of humans who automatically classify every species but themselves as monsters. As an extension of this dynamic, the narrative pointedly examines the immorality of killing perceived monsters, and the subtext of such encounters is that those who feel compelled to kill creatures for the crime of being different are in fact little more than monsters themselves.
Geralt’s internalized moral code becomes a focal point in navigating the complexities of discerning the presence of monstrosity in those around him. His refusal to kill intelligent beings, endangered species, or harmless creatures is a constant source of conflict that often leads to financial challenges, and in almost every tale, the evolving and morally ambiguous landscape constantly forces Geralt to question and reevaluate his principles. For example, “Bounds of Reason” exemplifies Geralt’s commitment to his moral code as he refuses to kill a dragon despite multiple societal pressures and financial incentives. The dichotomy between Geralt’s ethical stance and the greed-driven actions of the dragon hunters highlights the moral complexities inherent in Sapkowski’s world. Similarly, “Eternal Flame” introduces the dilemma of killing a doppler, an intelligent creature capable of mimicking others. Geralt’s refusal to do so aligns with his moral code, which emphasizes the importance of preserving intelligent creatures. In further support of Geralt’s position, the narrative gradually exposes the moral superiority of dopplers compared to the humans who seek to destroy them, and as a result, the story challenges traditional perceptions of monstrosity, blurring the lines between good and evil.
Significantly, the culmination of “Something More” unveils humanity’s best and worst traits, for while Geralt’s encounter with Yurga highlights the beauty of human compassion, the merchant’s kindness is contrasted with Geralt’s recollections of the Sodden soldiers’ ruthless sacrifices and the brutality of the Nilfgaardian invaders. This juxtaposition reinforces the theme that humans, not monsters, pose the greatest threat to humanity. Thus, it is telling that although Geralt remains steadfast in his principles regarding monsters, his sentiments toward humanity progressively sour. However, “Something More” delivers a form of redemption for humanity when Yurga asserts, “[I]t’s a base world [...] [b]ut that’s no reason for us all to become despicable. What we need is kindness. My father taught me that, and I teach it to my sons” (334). This sentiment plays a pivotal role in rejuvenating Geralt’s faith in human morality, and Yurga’s determination to pass his belief in kindness along to his children implies an enduring hope for the betterment of humanity. In short, Geralt reaffirms that humanity is worth protecting.
Geralt’s internal struggles reflect the moral quandaries present throughout the collection. As a self-proclaimed protector of humanity, he grapples with doubts and questions the actions of those who discriminate against non-humans. The narrative thus portrays Geralt’s pragmatic view of war while emphasizing his commitment to protecting intelligent beings from the ravages of human prejudice and ignorance. Sword of Destiny ultimately underscores the idea that even amidst a diverse array of monsters, humans emerge as the most dangerous monsters in the series. Sapkowski therefore crafts a narrative that delves into the complexities of morality and challenges traditional notions of monstrosity, highlighting the delicate balance that Geralt must strike in safeguarding humanity from both external and internal threats.
Sword of Destiny provides an extensive exploration of Geralt’s search for identity, and his struggle is further complicated by the insidious threads of the destiny that binds him tightly to Ciri. At the outset, Geralt’s self-perception of being a stoic, emotionless witcher endures through many dangers, but as his adventures unfold, the self-imposed limitations of this identity begin to unravel, and each new encounter reveals the witcher’s hidden emotions and deeply nuanced philosophies. For example, in “Bounds of Reason,” Geralt deviates from the witcher code to embark on a dragon hunt for Yennefer, and this morally ambiguous decision signals the first crack in his self-imposed emotional detachment. His claim of being “a servile golem […] a wisp of oakum blown by the wind” (45) reflects his struggle with belonging. The dichotomy between his “otherness” as a witcher and the rejection and prejudice he experiences from humans accentuates the complexities of his quest for identity.
“Shard of Ice” delves deeper into Geralt’s emotional struggle, particularly in his relationship with Yennefer. As the town’s hostility forces Geralt to confront emotions that he believes he should not possess, he eventually acknowledges, “I was stripped of feelings. But not utterly. Whoever did it made a botch of it” (113). This admission reflects the internal conflict between his emotionless witcher identity and the undeniable emotions that surface amidst his daily challenges. Ironically, only through the loss of Yennefer does Geralt begin to integrate these emotions into his evolving identity.
While every story in the collection touches on this theme to some extent, the events in “A Little Sacrifice” play a crucial role in Geralt’s journey of self-discovery, highlighting his growing acceptance of emotions, particularly his love for Yennefer. Throughout this romance-themed narrative, Geralt transforms significantly by cultivating empathy and engaging in introspection. Despite his fondness for Essi, he confronts the realization that he cannot forsake his love for Yennefer, and a crucial element of his character growth comes from the support of his friend. Establishing a sense of belonging with Dandelion is instrumental in reshaping Geralt’s understanding of himself. Their mutual connection is further emphasized by Geralt’s willingness to put himself in harm’s way to protect Dandelion, and this dynamic, coupled with Dandelion’s unfiltered honesty, forces Geralt to reassess his self-perception. The lively give-and-take in their relationship illustrates the profound normalcy that characterizes the man beneath the witcher mutations, and thus, Dandelion’s wildly contrasting personality contributes significantly to Geralt’s ongoing journey of self-discovery.
While Geralt’s continuing adventures allow him to gradually develop a sense of identity that transcends his status as a witcher, he nonetheless remains shackled by the psychological wounds of his mother’s decision to abandon him as a child. The resolution to this largely unarticulated issue arrives with “Something More,” for Geralt finally has the opportunity to confront his mother. The realization that her abandonment was not due to lack of love prompts a profound shift in Geralt’s self-perception and allows him to acknowledge his identity as a “Child of Destiny” just like Ciri. Consequently, he is able to accept his responsibility to protect Ciri, thus breaking the cycle of abandonment and reflecting a newfound understanding of how his identity impacts others. By embracing his doubts and emotions as inevitably human characteristics, Geralt fully accepts his identity and destiny. The collection thus becomes a journey of self-discovery for the witcher, compelling him to peel back the layers of his witcher identity to reveal the complex, emotional human beneath. The integration of his larger destiny into his evolving identity signifies a profound transformation that has lasting effects for Geralt throughout the remainder of the series.
Sword of Destiny intricately navigates the interplay of choice, chance, and destiny, for Sapkowski’s main focus is to unravel the ways in which key characters challenge, resist, and ultimately come to terms with the preordained paths that shape their lives. While choice and destiny have solid recurring roles, the author’s treatment of chance is more nuanced, for throughout the narratives, accidental occurrences often highlight the ambiguous relationship between chance and destiny. For example, in “Bounds of Reason,” “Eternal Flame,” and “Something More,” Geralt coincidentally encounters Dandelion, whose presence then drastically affects the outcome of the adventure in progress. Significantly, the author declines to state whether these are fated meetings or the result of simple chance, and the characters’ tendency to debate and question each other’s decisions leaves ample room for the dynamics of choice to complicate the equation. The vagaries of choice are further emphasized in “Bounds of Reason,” for although the dragon Villentretenmerth proclaims that Geralt and Yennefer are “made for each other” (80), their subsequent estrangement, however temporary, proves that even a fate-driven universe leaves room for individual decisions and detours from what must ultimately come to pass. The pair’s “on again, off again” relationship thus echoes the idea that destiny itself is somewhat malleable.
“A Little Sacrifice” widens the exploration of the theme by defining the role of destiny beyond Geralt’s immediate sphere, for the love between the human Agloval and the mermaid Sh’eenaz is seemingly predestined despite their disparate worlds. Similarly, Geralt’s eventual acceptance of his profound love for Yennefer overshadows other potential connections, such as his brief fling with Essi Daven, and he draws closer to actively choosing the course of action that has been predetermined for him. Building on this idea, “Sword of Destiny” challenges Geralt’s understanding of destiny as he pits the dubious strength of his doubts against the staunch beliefs of the dryads and ultimately loses the argument. The dryad queen’s pronouncement that “the sword of destiny has two blades” (295) introduces the notion that destiny requires an additional element to be effective, but only with the pivotal events in “Something More” does Sapkowski make it clear that choice must be blended with fate in order for that fate to be effective. When Geralt finally acknowledges Ciri herself as his “something more,” Sapkowski uses this moment to clarify that in order to fulfill his destiny, Geralt must actively choose to embrace it.
Ultimately, Geralt’s journey in Sword of Destiny is a delicate dance between destiny and choice. His reluctance to fully embrace destiny and his ultimate acceptance of Ciri as “something more” marks a significant evolution. While destiny weaves a compelling narrative thread throughout the collection, Geralt’s choices are equally pivotal. The decision to accept Ciri goes beyond a mere acquiescence to destiny, for it instead becomes his assertion of agency, his unique contribution to the narrative. This choice is the “something more” that breaks away from the deterministic path laid out by destiny. Thus, the novel’s conclusion emphasizes the importance of free will within Sapkowski’s universe. Whether Geralt defies destiny or aligns himself with it, his choices carry weight and consequence, and his stubborn refusal to be a mere pawn of destiny highlights the role of free will in a world where fate often seems preordained.
By Andrzej Sapkowski