logo

53 pages 1 hour read

Nancy Pelosi

The Art of Power: My Story as America’s First Woman Speaker of the House

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Preface-Part 2Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1: “Leadership’s Price” - Part 2: “Leadership in Congress”

Preface Summary: “Know Your Why”

Content Warning: This section includes discussions of physical and political violence.

Nancy Pelosi reflects on her motivations for entering politics, highlighting her Catholic faith (she quotes several scriptures in this chapter) and commitment to children as central drivers of her career. Drawing from the teachings of civil rights leader John Lewis, she emphasizes the importance of honoring every person’s divine spark. Her faith also inspires her to challenge hypocrisy, such as the historical contradictions between Christian worship and the treatment of enslaved people. 

As a mother of five, Pelosi also feels a deep responsibility to ensure a safer world for all children, both at home and abroad. Her motivation to be in politics is to address the fact that “one in five children in America […] go to sleep hungry each night. How could it be that in America […] one in five children lives in poverty?” (3) she asks.

Pelosi acknowledges the challenges she has faced as a woman in power. She has had to confront societal discomfort with women holding authority. She also had to confront her own discomfort with power. During the days when Pelosi was a volunteer in the California state Democratic Party, she had multiple titles. When she lamented this fact, Congresswoman Lindy Bogg told Pelosi that no man would ever say such a thing about himself.

Pelosi feels a profound responsibility to represent past, present, and future women in politics, noting that other women have mentored and encouraged her along the way. These mentors, including Congresswomen Bogg and Sala Bart (the woman Pelosi succeeded after Bart was diagnosed with cancer) have helped her define her purpose and embrace principles such as “Be yourself. Be ready. Know your power” (5). Pelosi encourages all women interested in politics to live by these dictums. These guiding principles have helped her navigate the political landscape and overcome gender-based stereotypes and attacks.

Pelosi came to Congress in 1987, five years before the “Year of the Woman,” when political action committees and the concerted efforts of women led to an increase in the previously very small number of women in Congress. The last barrier was the speakership. The incredible fact that no woman had ever held this post hit Pelosi when she represented the Democratic leadership in the Oval Office. The President greeted her especially, a nod to the fact that she was the first woman to ever have a seat at that table in that capacity. However, Pelosi wasn’t satisfied with being a “first.” She wanted more for women and for the diversity of women who did make it to Congress to tell their stories, ones in which they shared “their vision, their knowledge and judgment, and their strategic thinking. Their experiences gave them the courage to show the voters what is in their hearts, to empathize with and care about people,” (7) she argues.

In previewing her book, Pelosi highlights significant moments in her political career, such as her opposition to the Iraq War, advocating for human rights in China, the 2007 recession, the Affordable Care Act, and the January 6th, 2021, Capitol attack. She also reflects on her leadership in increasing the number of women in Congress, from 12 in 1987 to 94 in 2024. Through these experiences, Pelosi underscores her enduring commitment to wielding power for the greater good.

Part 1, Chapter 1 Summary: “Knock, Knock, Knock”

On October 28th, 2022, a man broke into the Pelosi home in San Francisco and repeatedly struck Paul, Pelosi’s husband, with a hammer. The attacker later admitted that he was inspired in part by rhetoric that Republicans, such as the former president Donald Trump, used to demonize Pelosi. She also describes the insensitivity of the news coverage that followed the attack. Pelosi traces this demonization back to 2010, when Republicans began spending millions of dollars in political attacks against her. Pelosi sees a direct connection between this political violence and efforts of the insurrectionists on January 6th, 2021, to capture and harm her.

Pelosi pursued the permission of her husband and one of her daughters before she entered the political spotlight as a congresswoman for California, since she knew that becoming a politician and a public figure would place her family in the spotlight. She thought she understood the cost of such scrutiny on her, but she, like other political figures, thought politicians’ families were off-limits when it came to rhetorical attacks. Few people considered the attacks might extend to violence against political figures and their families. The attack on Paul changed all of that. Had she known about the cost to her family, she might not have gone into state and national politics.

Pelosi recounts finding out about the attack on Paul and the harm subsequent coverage did to her children and grandchildren. Journalists were so focused on getting a scoop on this sensational story that many of Pelosi’s children and grandchildren found out about the attack via newscast. She notes that “from the moment news of the attack was reported, it was like a second assault being waged on Paul and [her] family,” most especially because of the “lies and misrepresentations” that circulated about the attack (25). She focuses on Donald Trump and Republicans in particular as authors of crude jokes about the devastating attack on Paul. Pelosi not only sees such dehumanizing language as not befitting these public figures, but also believes the widespread nature of such verbal attacks says that something is wrong with the United States and its political culture.

Paul has made a partial recovery, but the family faces traumatizing reminders of the attack, such as the bloodstains on the floor of their home. Security for Pelosi, her family, and other politicians and their families has stepped up at great cost as a result of political rhetoric. There have also been more innocuous, but nevertheless frightening attacks, such as the defacement of their home with denigrating graffiti. 

The impact of such threats of violence is that people who would run for office have been dissuaded from doing so because of possible danger to themselves and their families. Dehumanizing political rhetoric has to stop if a culture of political violence is to be avoided in the United States.

Part 2, Chapter 2 Summary: “We Have Made History, and Now We Must Make Progress”

Pelosi discusses her rise to power in the House, including her election to the speakership by her peers; the intricacies of passing legislation, given the distinct roles of the White House and the Senate; and how the presidency of Donald Trump marked a departure from the norms that allows the government to function effectively.

Pelosi rose to power as Democratic leader and Speaker of the House not because she was invited to enter the all-male Democratic leadership, but because she was assertive and ready for the opportunity. Getting into the race for leader and speaker required her to put herself up for these roles without the approval of the leadership, which thought she should wait her turn. She insisted that “women had been waiting for more than two hundred years” (39), but that she wanted people to neither support nor oppose her because she was a woman.

Pelosi was always good at counting votes—assessing whether she had the votes to pass a piece of legislation—so she ran only because she knew she could win and because she had prepared herself through taking on increasingly responsible positions. She made history by winning. Once in power, she worked on diversifying the makeup of the Democratic caucus and leadership, and she also supported reforms to make the House more inclusive.

Pelosi gives a detailed view of the important and complicated role of the Speaker of the House, which requires mediating intricate negotiations among the Senate, White House, and the House. She believes intuition, honed through experience and expertise, is the most important strength a speaker needs to be successful. Pelosi compares the speaker’s balancing of multiple interests to a weaver constructing cloth on a loom. Passing legislation with temporary alliances is like the spinning of a kaleidoscope. A good speaker knows what is in the legislation and who will support it before it goes to the floor. 

Members vote in accordance with the four Cs—adherence to the Constitution, representation of the interests of constituents, conscience, and courage, according to Pelosi. Pelosi cites the legislative process to pass the Affordable Care Act, stimulus during the economic crisis of 2007, and support for Ukraine in its war against Russia as examples of legislation that required all four Cs for individual members.

Pelosi shifts gears at one point to address the issue of Donald Trump. She is “still amazed by how many people [she] meet[s] who ask about only one topic: Donald Trump” (57). According to Pelosi, Donald Trump, then the 45th president of the United States, was a chaotic, self-important, ignorant, and dishonest president who upended the careful orchestration of power required to keep the government functioning. Pelosi complains that it was virtually impossible to negotiate with the president because he refused to allow his staff to interact without micromanaging them. He would capriciously make demands that undercut months of work when legislation was produced.

Trump was also dishonest in little things, like the number of popular votes he received in comparison to Hillary Clinton, and more consequential areas, such as what actually happened during his 2019 call with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine. Trump allegedly asked Zelenskyy to aid him in finding out damaging information about the son of Joe Biden (then Trump’s opponent in the race for president) in exchange for receiving aid from the United States. His greatest failure was in his handling of the COVID epidemic; whereas President George H. W. Bush worked in a bipartisan fashion to address the AIDS epidemic of his time, Trump relied on denial and untruths, leading to the deaths of many.

Pelosi responded to Trump through comments in the press (e.g., promising to pray for him and America after his untruth-filled inauguration speech), public gestures such as ripping up his State of the Union speech one year, and advancing articles of impeachment when his actions violated his oath of office or the law. Pelosi argues that the problem with American politics today isn’t just about Trump; it is about “slowly metastasizing greed” (70) for power and money. This problem can only be addressed by “putting people—especially our children—over politics” (70).

Preface-Part 2 Analysis

Pelosi uses her Preface and initial chapters to establish her credibility, give her theory of power and its uses, and address head-on the significance of what it means to be a woman in power.

Pelosi relies on all three of the major persuasive appeals to establish her credibility. She relies on pathos—the appeal to emotion—right up front when she claims in the second paragraph of the book that she is first and foremost a mother who has extended her maternal care to all children in America, including those who are hungry and poor. The protection of vulnerable children is a time-honored way of using emotions to sway listeners/readers to a particular point of view.

Pelosi’s use of the language and identity of motherhood also allows her to deal with one of the primary challenges she has faced when it comes to The Challenges of Navigating Gender Norms—discomfort with women wielding authority in arenas that have traditionally been associated with masculinity. Pelosi suggests that, by expanding the traditionally feminine role of mothering to include politics, there is nothing unfeminine about being a politician. Pelosi thus attempts to neutralize objections to female political power by blending traditional gender norms with the exercise of leadership. 

Pelosi relies on logos—the appeal to reason or logic—to show that it makes sense for a person like her to be in power. When she explains her rationale for jumping the line to leadership, she does so with the logical argument that keeping to the typical path to power would result in no women in power, since the queue in front of her was all men. She also uses data—the increase in the number of female representatives in the House since she has had any measure of power in it—to show that she has been responsible with that power and is thus fit to wield it.

Pelosi also draws on ethos—the appeal to values—throughout this section. In this section, those values are on display as her Catholicism and her belief in social justice. Pelosi explicitly cites the Bible in the Preface as a basis for her actions. Her presentation of her sincere beliefs is an attempt to portray herself as motivated by ethical principles, not power for its own sake. Another ethical appeal is her reliance on the words of John Lewis—a man famed for his commitment to social justice—as a frame for her discussion of the art of power. When she cites his beliefs about politics as a practice that honors the divine spark in humanity, she depicts herself as a co-worker in the effort to create a more just society.

Pelosi also seeks to demonstrate that she has a credible mastery of the skills and knowledge needed to be effective. When Pelosi describes the ins and outs of how a bill is passed through the House, or how she specifically used her skills to shepherd through the major pieces of legislation she cites, it reflects her command of her role and her understanding of The Dynamics of Political Negotiation and Conflict. When Pelosi compares herself to a weaver and a strategic spinner of a kaleidoscope of alliances, she is claiming she is in full control of the power and knowledge she needs to get things done. Her emphasis on her competence once more reinforces the idea that she can hold her own in a traditionally male-dominated field.

Pelosi complicates her identity as a powerful woman by humanizing herself in the account of the attack on Paul and the impact of the news coverage on her family. When she goes into detail about the attack and the vitriol she receives from political opponents, she is making the point that she has paid a high price to be powerful. This display of vulnerability runs counter to her reputation as a ruthless, tough politician, depicting her experience of power as more nuanced. 

It is well-known that Pelosi’s greatest political nemesis is Donald Trump, the 45th and 47th president of the United States (See: Key Figures), so her attacks on him follow lines of criticism she has frequently offered since his first term. She situates her discussion of him as a response to the needs of her audience, claiming people are always asking her about Trump, much to her surprise. She isn’t just after cutting a political rival down to size, however. Instead, she uses Trump as a foil to show the dangers of The Nature of Leadership and Power without compassion, reason, and values.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text