51 pages • 1 hour read
Sherry TurkleA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Turkle starts dating an MIT mathematician named Seymour Papert, 20 years her senior. They connect over a shared interest in metacognition, where one is cognizant of one’s thoughts. Papert’s AI research involves people speaking aloud as they solve problems, which Turkle connects to psychoanalytical free association. Turkle visits Papert’s lab, in which children learn to program computers, to conduct research on the emotional impacts of the children’s interaction with the machines. Professionally, Turkle connects with Papert. She realizes that their research interests are complimentary and that his seniority at MIT could be a great asset to her career as an advocate for her research in the scientific community. On a personal level, Turkle falls in love with Papert for the way he thinks and understands her ideas.
Papert and Turkle begin to date and eventually get engaged. Throughout this period, Turkle is troubled by Papert’s relationships with his ex-girlfriends and students and the secrets he keeps from her. He often keeps in communication with other women he’s dated, and Turkle receives threats from one of his obsessive ex-girlfriends. He also hides his marital past from Turkle and tries to hide pieces of the story of his daughter, Diane, and her mother, his ex-wife who lives in Switzerland. He is afraid to admit to Turkle that he feels he abandoned his daughter, knowing that Turkle will be triggered due to her absentee biological dad. Despite these red flags and her gut instincts, Turkle agrees to marry Papert when he proposes to her during a scuba trip in the Bahamas.
To announce their engagement to her family, Turkle invites Papert to meet her grandfather and Aunt Mildred in Brooklyn. She is nervous that they will disapprove of the age gap, but Papert wins over her grandfather by using his skill as a researcher and teacher. He teaches her grandfather to juggle, engaging him in “loud thinking” as he would one of his students, getting him to connect with his memories and body. Turkle’s grandfather is delighted and approves of their union. Despite this, Turkle remains troubled by Papert’s behavior, especially his inability to keep appointments and show up for her. She realizes that both Papert and his research partner, Minsky, value intellectual brilliance over consideration for people’s feelings.
Turkle’s research at Papert’s lab develops her theory of the impact of “evocative objects” on identity. Turkle reflects on the experience of a young girl who gains a sense of control by being able to intricately program a machine, which increases her control over her addictions in real life. Turkle furthers her understanding of the relationship between people and objects through her students’ class assignments, in which they reflect on an “evocative object” from their childhood and examine its impact on their scientific mindset. One student views Freudian slips as computing errors, bits of dropped code, from which Turkle extracts the concept that computers think in absolutes. She interviews hackers devoted to “beautiful machines” and notes their obsession with elegant code, in which the goal is to increase simplicity and efficiency. Turkle reflects on the social and cultural shifts surrounding technology, in which machines are increasingly designed to entertain rather than teach or facilitate thinking.
Turkle and Papert start to plan their wedding, but Papert reveals that he has been married more than once before and will need to get a Jewish annulment from his first marriage before they can be wed according to Jewish tradition. Turkle is shocked and disappointed when the annulment is not approved. They will need to be married by a nontraditional rabbi who does not require the official paperwork. When Turkle and Papert are buying her engagement ring in the jewelry store, Papert also purchases a gummy bear charm for a woman he used to date. Turkle avoids facing these issues and marries Papert despite his inability to be honest and faithful. Turkle avoids talking about their troubled relationship to her psychanalyst and eventually stops attending analysis to avoid the truth.
Through her continued AI research, Turkle studies the links between morality and robots. She debates the morality of teaching children to code with the computer scientist Joseph Weizenbaum, who argues that it is immoral to teach children to program computers because the technology demands efficiency without consideration of values. Turkle argues that people’s interaction with computers causes them to reflect on the human capacity for moral judgment and records conversations of children discussing the likelihood that a machine can cheat. She emphasizes that machines are incapable of human emotion because they do not have bodies that will die. She realizes that at MIT, the students are operating in a system that portrays machines as neutral, not considering the way that interacting with machines changes people’s thinking and feeling selves. Turkle dedicates herself as a teacher to helping students get in touch with their empathy.
Papert selfishly cancels his daughter, Diane’s, trip to Disneyland, choosing to seclude himself and study instead. This triggers Turkle’s memories of her biological father, Charlie’s, abandonment. During Thanksgiving in 1978, she decides to hire a private detective to search for him. A few months later, they find him, and she sets up a meeting.
At their first meetup, Turkle immediately relates to Charlie’s passion for knowledge, which he channels into his books about vegetarianism and peace and disproving Einstein’s theories. When he reveals that he experimented on Turkle as a toddler by withholding attention, she is horrified and calls Papert to come join her. When he arrives, he worries about his own similarities to Charlie, realizing that they are both eccentric and “odd.” Turkle realizes that Papert does not know how to care for her, only how to objectify her to better understand her and define their relationship.
After meeting her father, Turkle is raw and vulnerable, which puts a new stress on her and Papert’s relationship. He and Turkle agree to live separately while he works in Paris and she works in Boston. She’s excited to visit him in Paris, hoping for a romantic fantasy trip that will rekindle their romance, but when Turkle arrives, he tells her he has been living with another woman in his Paris apartment. In 1982, they decide to get a divorce. Turkle feels relieved and starts psychoanalysis again, finally able to be honest with herself about her and Papert’s relationship.
In this section of the memoir, Turkle examines her first marriage and its impact on her identity both personally and professionally. Her relationship with Papert returns her to a world of secrets and lies, one she is familiar with from childhood. As with her mother, Turkle refuses to see the truth because she wants to preserve the fantasy of the relationship. She conveys the value of psychoanalytic free associative talk, speaking of how it can serve to uncover revelations about the self. Through psychoanalysis, Turkle recognizes her psychological relationship pattern, which emerged from her and her mother’s secret-laden relationship.
Turkle again explores Self-Discovery Through “Evocative Objects” when recounting her marriage and separation with Papert. She sees her memory of herself at the time as an object. By interacting with it through the distance of memoir, she finds a way to gain back her honesty. Turkle admits to her own complicity in her marriage: “[H]e did not fall in love with a woman who saw him realistically and loved him for who he was, as he was. He was a magician who conjured up many selves, and I let him” (259). Turkle, despite her ability to shrewdly psychoanalyze, creates a fantasy image of the man she wants her husband to be. This is reminiscent of the fantasy she created of her father as a child.
Turkle contrasts the act of creating a fantasy vision of her husband and father to her father’s objectification of her. She imagines what her father must be like to feel closer to him. In contrast, he imagines her as an object to extract data from in order to maintain control and distance in their relationship. She conveys the pain of that experience and the link between her father and her first husband: “I was haunted by fathers who looked at children and assumed object ownership rather than relationship” (299). Turkle attributes fathers who behave this way to a lack of empathy.
Turkle’s experience with Papert, Minsky, and MIT culture propels research for her book The Second Self and her view of The Need for Empathy in Science. She uses conversations and events she attends with Papert and Minsky to demonstrate their obsessive dedication to technological development to the exclusion of human connection. Minsky’s dismissal of Papert’s rudeness highlights their value system: “Marvin and Seymour made a world where intellect was valued more highly than empathy, a good conversation more highly than common courtesy” (280). Similarly, Turkle sums up MIT and the broader scientific culture. She uses the language of computers to describe people: “[T]he human mind, like a machine mind, was built up from a multitude of simple, decentralized programs” (260).
By Sherry Turkle