66 pages • 2 hours read
Stieg LarssonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
One of the novel’s prominent themes is violence against women and its ubiquity and normalization in society. Larsson does not leave this theme up to interpretation, establishing it immediately with the book’s original title: Män som hatar kvinnor, or Men Who Hate Women. Additionally, an epigraph accompanies each of the novel’s four parts and provides a statistic on the percentage of Swedish women who have been threatened or assaulted by men and the high number of unreported cases. Larsson thereby roots the different types of violence against women in his narrative–sexual violence, domestic abuse, assault, murder, and institutional violence in fields like medicine, psychiatry, and law–in the real world.
In addition to the central plot of Gottfried’s and Martin’s serial killings of women, the novel delves into the violent histories of the men abusing Harriet, Cecilia, and Salander. Armansky’s private investigation cases often involve women seeking protection from former partners, and Salander grows up not knowing a single woman who has not experienced sexual assault. She assesses that “this was the natural order of things” (249), and her comment ties directly to the ways society normalizes misogyny and the violence that it fuels.
Salander is quick to categorize the perpetrators of violence against women as misogynists. Gottfried, Martin, and Wennerström are men who hate women (417, 597), and she conceptualizes their violence as a form of hate crime. Salander rejects framing their attacks in terms of male lust or female promiscuity and recognizes sexual and physical assault as systemic violence. The novel criticizes the ways that institutions perpetuate sexist ideology, including the criminal justice system that relegates women as “legal prey” (249). Harriet, Cecilia, and Salander do not report their experiences of assault to the authorities, and their silence points to the ways the legal system minimizes the crimes and attributes blame and shame to women.
The social institutions of family, marriage, and religion also factor in the Vanger family’s abuse, as the perpetrators of violence against Harriet and Cecilia use their ideologies of “a woman’s place” to justify their assaults. Gottfried’s murders are entrenched in biblical verses that punish women who are deemed deviant. Harald and Birger’s verbal attacks on Cecilia place the blame of her failed marriage on her inability to “keep a man” (280), rather than her husband’s violence and abuse. Harriet and Cecilia both attempt to keep the appearance of healthy families and marriages. Their experience of shame illustrates how the stigma of dysfunction in the family or marriage pressures and blames women for not fulfilling their presumed domestic roles.
Larsson’s narrative incorporates other less-overtly violent forms of sexism as well, illustrating that misogyny is a spectrum and a multi-faceted issue. Salander experiences brutal, physical violence, but is also frequently considered incompetent on the basis of her gender and how she presents herself. Throughout the novel, men doubt her competence and are embarrassed when she proves them wrong. That the same character experiences wildly different types of sexism shows that these different experiences are all part of a culture of misogyny; the seemingly minor experiences like being underestimated or misbelieved create the circumstances in which more violent crimes can persist.
The Vanger family’s long history elucidates the theme of how wealth can mask corruption. Blomkvist quickly learns that hiding behind the “official image of the family” (182) are “poisonous animosities” (183). In his early internet research, Blomkvist remarked that Vanger Corporation was in the papers daily, but coverage generally focused on their industries. To Blomkvist’s surprise, antisemitism, domestic abuse, and eugenics are just a few of the family secrets that patriarch Henrik Vanger already knows about.
The Vangers hide their criminal and heinous past and present by cultivating their appearances as members of a prestigious, wealthy elite. This is most evident with Martin, who conceals his criminal behavior with ease behind his “architect-designed home” (148) and “expensive designer pieces” (203). His torture chamber was built to his specifications–soundproof and windowless–under the guise of functioning as a “safe room [...] for important files” (516). The luxuriousness of his yacht disguises the fact that he is using it to dispose of bodies in the sea. Martin’s wealth allows him to maintain an image of a sophisticated and upright CEO who is exempt from suspicion, all while working as a serial killer for three decades.
Vanger also positions himself as an enemy of Wennerström’s, but he is not unlike other titans of industry who use their money to protect them from public scrutiny. When Vanger joins the Millennium board, he acknowledges that his father believed it was “politically advantageous to have a section of the media behind [them]” (223). Likewise, while Vanger says that he abhors his family’s antisemitism, he acknowledges that his company benefitted from Nazi policies and gives no indication that the company has given up any of that ill-gotten wealth.
Though most of Blomkvist’s interactions with Vanger leave him feeling uneasy and morally compromised, Blomkvist holds no doubts about Wennerström’s guilt and corruption. A fraudulent financier, Wennerström makes his profits from embezzlement, stock-market speculation, money laundering, and various other financial loopholes that he obfuscates in thousands of bank accounts. His “empire was like a living, formless, pulsating organism that kept changing shape” (605). Though Wennerström never appears as a speaking character in the novel, his looming and slippery presence functions as an emblem of corporate corruption and capitalist greed.
Holger Palmgren’s method of advocacy parallels the expectation of intellectual vigor that Blomkvist holds for journalists. For years, medical and legal reports characterized Salander as violent and disturbed, perpetuating a narrative that pathologizes her based on “observations” (175) rather than valid interviews or examinations. These reports, “handed down” (175) from one institution to another, conclude with the opinion that Salander requires psychiatric institutionalization. During Salander’s hearing, Palmgren did not simply trust the validity of these reports and ensured that “[e]very detail of the opinion was scrutinized, and the doctor was required to explain the scientific basis for each statement” (176), which the doctors could not ultimately do. Palmgren’s vigilance as he fights for Salander’s rights is precisely what Blomkvist expects from financial reporters.
Blomkvist argues that reporters fail to take a critical stance against corporate greed. In his book, The Knights Templar, he criticizes how:
time after time, without the least objection, so many financial reporters seemed content to regurgitate the statements issued by CEOs and stock market speculators—even when this information was plainly misleading or wrong (110).
Blomkvist’s emphasis on the regurgitation of false information draws a sharp parallel to the damaging ways that medical and legal professionals have written about Salander. This parallel emphasizes how the media also plays a role in perpetuating narratives that strip women of their agency, cultivating a misogynistic social climate in general.
The novel provides several examples of problematic media coverage that portrays women as sex objects and victims. During Salander’s research on Harriet’s list of names, she discovers Magda’s case quite easily. Magda’s murder had been sensationalized in television dramas that catered to the curiosity over the crime’s grotesque nature. Magda’s death was “[w]ritten with obvious glee and in a chatty and titillating tone” (392). Such exploitation of violent crimes against women is the leading reason for Blomkvist’s decision to protect Harriet’s privacy and not expose the Vanger murders.
The media does, however, effect change through Berger. Berger herself is often cast as “an incompetent media bimbo” (170) by male reporters. When she observes that the rising number of Millennium subscribers are women, she increases investigative coverage on women’s issues and hires a female managing editor. Millennium’s mission expands to not just exposing financial corruption but also advocating for women’s rights, and Berger’s efforts to represent women in the magazine’s pages provide a blueprint for better coverage of women in journalism.
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Feminist Reads
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Psychological Fiction
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection