44 pages • 1 hour read
William FaulknerA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In the tiny town of Frenchman’s Bend, power accrues to whoever is most willing to disregard ethical considerations in its pursuit. Though the Snopes family, particularly Flem, are the key examples of ruthlessness, the Varners are similarly powerful and employ similar methods. Will Varner is described as “a farmer, a usurer, a veterinarian; Judge Benbow of Jefferson once said of him that a milder-mannered man never bled a mule or stuffed a ballot box” (4). Though he has a less ruthless reputation than the one Flem develops, he uses the same methods to maintain power. The power struggle between the Varners and the Snopeses is not a conflict between different sets of values; both families value power and wealth above all else, and the only question is which family will be most successful in scamming and manipulating the other members of the community.
Flem Snopes is the key example of ruthless ambition in The Hamlet. Though he remains in the shadows, he is proved to be pulling the strings of economic power within Frenchman’s Bend. His willingness to scam or betray anyone to get ahead, even his own family, leads to widespread unhappiness and suffering in the town. Ratliff asserts, “There’s some things even a Snopes wont do. I dont know just exactly what they are, but they’s some somewhere” (265-66), but throughout The Hamlet Flem never hits upon these limits. He marries a woman he doesn’t care about, gives out usurious loans, and leaves his cousin to face criminal trial with no aid.
The ruthless behavior of the Snopeses often leads others to disregard their own moral guardrails and adopt similarly unscrupulous—if usually less effective—behaviors. For example, the farmer Henry Armstid is willing to bet his and his wife’s financial security to engage with Flem’s staged auction, proceeding to put his wife in physical danger over it. He then becomes obsessed with getting one over on Flem by buying the Old Frenchman’s Place from him and finding the treasure purportedly buried there. This leads to him ending the novel with Flem holding a mortgage over him as he desperately digs on the grounds of the Old Frenchman’s Place. Though other members of the town engage in their own attempts to be ruthless and self-serving, they rarely succeed as the Varners and Snopeses do. The power of these two families arises not only from their underhanded tactics but also from their ability to capture the mechanisms of institutional power. As Mrs. Tull declares to the judge, “You’ll let Eck Snopes or Flem Snopes or that whole Varner tribe snatch you out of the wagon and beat you half to death against a wooden bridge. But when it comes to suing them for your just rights and a punishment, oh no. Because that wouldn’t be neighborly” (328). The competitive corruption of the Snopes and Varner families has not only corrupted the townspeople, it has corrupted the justice system, making their entrenched power even more difficult to dislodge.
The Hamlet is focused on the lives of the rural community of Frenchman’s Bend, detailing their pasts, experiences, and circumstances to give context to their interactions with the Snopeses. By focusing on individual lives in Frenchman’s Bend, William Faulkner illustrates the struggles of rural life and how those challenges can exacerbate the danger posed by Snopesian traits like selfishness, ambition, and paranoia. Further, by focusing on such unremarkable people, the narrative gives value to often-forgotten rural nobodies as people whose stories are worth examining and contemplating.
Life in Frenchman’s Bend and surrounding communities is always precarious, and success—when it doesn’t come through grift—comes only from years of hardship and struggle. By detailing the struggles by which the people of Frenchman’s Bend have built their lives, Faulkner makes it all the more devastating when these lives come to ruin through the Snopeses’ venal machinations. Houston’s murder at the hands of Mink Snopes, for example, comes at the end of an entire chapter devoted to Houston’s life: his struggle to finish school, his lifelong love affair with his eventual wife, and his grief at her sudden death.
This approach also allows for a focus to be given to the victims, both primary and secondary, of Snopesian schemes. The farmers Flem scams are shown as full people rather than caricatures. The women of Frenchman’s Bend are also given focus. The narrative does not skate over the fate of Mink Snopes’s wife and children, instead detailing the difficulties they face from Mink’s unthinking and selfish actions. Henry Armstid’s wife, too, is portrayed as the victim of both the pony auction and the desperation it brings out in Henry. The Tulls, though minor characters, are also given the spotlight, with Mrs. Tull being the person given a voice to condemn the system in place for not protecting anyone from the Snopeses’ and Varners’ schemes. Most of all, Eula, who at first is described comically, eventually becomes a representation of the consequences of the schemes and dealings of her father and Flem. As she is described leaving with Flem, “[Eula’s] was not a tragic face: it was just damned” (265). Frenchman’s Bend’s physical and financial isolation means there are few options for the inhabitants other than participating in the economy dominated by the Varners and the Snopes. Their struggles in this isolated rural economy make them even more vulnerable to the predatory behavior of their most powerful neighbors.
The rural isolation of the town of Frenchman’s Bend sets up the theme of waste—wasted resources, wasted potential, and wasted life. Eula Varner is a key example of this. She spends most of her childhood “wasting” her time, lacking the stimulation needed to force her out of her lethargy and indolence. When she does grow up, her beauty and sexuality are restricted and then given away to Flem, a man uninterested in them. The people around Eula do not expect or even allow her to have an inner life or any hopes of her own—treating her instead as a bargaining chip and a symbol of her family’s status.
Mink Snopes’s murder of Houston is also an example of the waste that runs rampant in Frenchman’s Bend. He kills Houston out of injured pride, and then doesn’t even manage to profit from the murder, leaving $50 on his body, leading to his own imprisonment of Mink and the desperation of his wife and children. None of it was necessary. The death of Houston’s cow mirrors the murder of Houston himself. The cow is killed for no other reason than to preserve the Snopeses’ reputation, a waste of both the cow’s life and the money used to buy it.
Beyond the individual wastes, there are the large-scale ones enforced by Flem Snopes’s and Will Varner’s systems of money making. The work of the townspeople is used up and conned away from them by powerful families like the Snopeses and the Varners—their efforts in this way are “wasted” as they go toward funding further schemes and cons. As Mrs. Tull proclaims at the trial, everything is decided in the favor of those two families. The inclusion of the Varner family in this statement is significant. While the Snopeses increased the level of blatant corruption and self interest in the town, Will Varner already had such systems in place.
Ratliff is the one who sees most clearly the waste going on in Frenchman’s Bend. As one of the main connections between the town and the outside world, and as the narrative’s designated observer and moral opposition to the Snopeses, he often remarks on his frustration with their schemes. Thinking on Flem, Ratliff has the following sentiment:
[H]e felt [...] outrage at the waste, the useless squandering; at a situation intrinsically and inherently wrong by any economy, like building a log dead-fall and baiting it with a freshened heifer to catch a rat; or no, worse: as though the gods themselves had funnelled all the concentrated bright wet-slanted unparadised June onto a dung-heap, breeding pismires (159).
Ratliff’s canniness allows him to see the true scope of what is happening in Frenchman’s Bend as people vie for hierarchal power over their neighbors.
By William Faulkner