logo

48 pages 1 hour read

Deborah Blum

The Poison Squad: One Chemist's Single-Minded Crusade for Food Safety at the Turn of the Twentieth Century

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 1, Chapters 1-3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1, Chapter 1 Summary: “A Chemical Wilderness”

Dr. Harvey Washington Wiley was born in 1844, and raised on his family’s farm in Indiana, where he worked alongside his progressive, abolitionist parents in all aspects of their agrarian endeavors. Dr. Wiley attained his medical degree, earned a bachelor’s degree in chemistry, and was appointed Purdue University’s first chemistry professor. While on sabbatical from Purdue, Dr. Wiley went to Europe and studied under the renowned scientist August Wilhelm von Hoffman, where he learned the most current, sophisticated techniques of food analysis in the field. He returned with specialized laboratory instruments he purchased himself and a level of expertise unmatched in the United States.

In 1881, the Indiana Board of Health asked Dr. Wiley to examine samples of honey, maple syrup, jam, and other products with a high sugar content being sold to consumers. Dr. Wiley discovered that these products were rarely what they claimed to be; most were corn syrup dyed to approximate a desirable color. Dr. Wiley did not object to the sale of corn syrup, but he believed that consumers were entitled to transparency. While Dr. Wiley’s reports on his findings resulted in criticism from members of the corn and honey industries, they earned him the attention of George Loring, head of the United States Department of Agriculture. Loring offered Dr. Wiley the position of Chief Chemist for the UDSA’s Bureau of Chemistry. In 1883, Dr. Wiley moved to Washington, D.C. to accept his post. Dr. Wiley’s first undertaking was to assess the adulteration processes in the dairy industry. Americans were consuming more milk than anywhere else in the world. The hazards of consuming milk were known but not scientifically quantified.

Unrefrigerated, unpasteurized, and produced in unsanitary conditions, the milk sold to the average American consumer, Dr. Wiley learned, was frequently diluted, spoiling, and rife with deadly bacteria. To maximize profits, dairies mixed milk with water, adding chalk and plaster-of-Paris to approximate the color that consumers expected. Wiley also learned that slaughterhouses found a way to market a fraudulent butter alternative made from the cast-off remnants of animal products processed in their facilities, advertised as butter, oleomargarine, or butterine. The results of his study, published in the first installment of Foods and Food Adulterants (also known as Bulletin 13) outlined the extent of adulteration in the industry. In 1886, the Butter Act was passed in an attempt to clearly define products which could legally be called butter, but like many of the laws to come relating to food adulteration, it was narrow in scope and easily circumvented by shrewd manufacturers.

Part 1, Chapter 2 Summary: “Cheated, Fooled, and Bamboozled”

In the significant migrations of residents from rural farm communities to urban centers, the demand for food in locations without agrarian access created the necessity for consumers to purchase foods they may have once grown for themselves. In turn, this led to the growth of the food manufacturing industry. Food companies now needed to devise a way to source, process, and package their wares for distribution across the United States.

The adulteration of food products sold in the United States was an open secret among manufacturers whose goal was to meet demands for popular foodstuffs at the lowest possible production cost. It was common practice for manufacturers to package and sell a product which had little or nothing in common with what was promised on its label. Powdered foods in particular, like baking goods and spices, were cut with other ingredients or replaced altogether, as in the case of flour mixed with chalk, or ground coconut shells sold as ground pepper. Arguing that genuine, pure food products were too expensive to procure and process for profit, manufacturers justified adulteration as necessary to keep their retail prices low and remain competitive in the market.

In this period, refrigeration technologies were not advanced enough to maintain temperature consistently throughout transport, and most American homes would have been considered fortunate if they possessed an ice box, the late 19th and early 20th century version of a cooler. Products which would rot or spoil, especially animal products, were adulterated with preservatives or masking agents to prevent loss of profit when shipments reached their destination.

Of chief concern to Dr. Wiley was his belief that consumers had the right to know what they were purchasing. While he would later focus on assessing the harm that could result from contact with food additives, his initial advocacy began with calls for transparency. Wiley was also aware that while some products might be relatively harmless in smaller doses, most foods were adulterated, thereby compounding the actual amount of these chemicals one might ingest in a single sitting. He was concerned about the potential long-term effects of these repeated, uninterrupted exposures.

Publications issued by the Bureau of Chemistry were not readily available to the public unless one requested a copy of the document or read about their contents in the press. Dr. Wiley felt that it was crucial that the American public be apprised of what was in their food. For that reason, he hired Alex Wedderburn, a science writer, to compose copy with the purpose of communicating the research findings of the chemistry division to a more public audience. Dr. Wiley’s supervisor, Julius Morton, incensed by Wedderburn’s forceful indictments of food manufacturers, dismissed Wedderburn. Moreover, Morton began reducing the budget for Wiley’s food purity studies, requiring Wiley to appeal to him for every purchase in the department.

Part 1, Chapter 3 Summary: “The Beef Court”

During the Spanish-American war in Cuba, the United States government contracted with slaughterhouses to provide soldiers canned meat as part of their food rations. When the soldiers opened these cans, they found scraps of low-quality, cast-off portions of meat, wallowing in green sludge and actively decaying. Many soldiers reported the distinct smell of formaldehyde upon opening the cans. Serving in Cuba, future President Theodore Roosevelt witnessed the ubiquitous rot present in the meat intended for American soldiers. Roosevelt chastised the government and the meat manufacturers for what he believed to be so insulting and dishonorable an oversight.

The public was outraged, and Congress convened a hearing into the matter, asking Dr. Wiley to evaluate the meat that was provided to the Army. There were few remaining samples of the actual meat sent to Cuba, as most of it was discarded as dangerous and unpalatable. One of Dr. Wiley’s most revelatory discoveries was that the meat so broadly attested to be unfit for consumption shared so much in common with what was available to American consumers on grocery shelves. It was believed that the heat and humidity of the Cuban climate sped up the decomposition process of the meat; under similar conditions, Dr. Wiley reasoned, the meat consumed by consumers would likely follow the same course. Dr. Wiley, dedicated to reporting only what he can establish with rigorous scientific testing, acknowledged that he could find no trace of formaldehyde in the meat, but he did discover that the soldiers were also suffering metal poisoning stemming from the seepage of metals from the cans into the meat. Despite the attempts at preservation, the meat was rotten, old, and of terrible quality. It was stringy, fatty, tough, and without any nutritional value. Wiley confirmed that the soldiers who consumed it contracted bacterial infections as a result of their exposure to the meat. His testimony legitimized the medical, physiological aspect of what the soldiers reported. There were no laws in place to protect consumers, and therefore no incentive for the beef industry to supply safe, quality meat. Although they cheated the government by accepting federal funds for inedible product and sickened soldiers, the beef manufacturers could not be fined and were not vulnerable to prosecution or liability. Moreover, they could not be sued by consumers and were protected by their powerful allies. Both the food industry and the chemical industries which produced the chemicals used by the food industry were pouring their money into making sure their business practices faced no obstructions.

Part 1, Chapters 1-3 Analysis

Dr. Wiley’s upbringing set the direction for the strong moral compass which defined the way he conducted himself and the way he perceived himself in relation to others. His story blends the personal with the political, in the sense that the success of pure food advocacy was a result of Harvey Washington Wiley’s integrity—a major theme of the book.

He was driven by his strong adherence to his egalitarian values, rooted in his sense of social justice. His character was defined by the strictness with which he followed his own expectations and by the unwavering allegiance he bore to his espoused values throughout his life. Dr. Wiley loved science and its potential to serve the American people. When he hired Alexander Wedderburn, it was first attempt at community outreach and USDA transparency. Part of the difference of opinion he experienced between himself, other members of the USDA, and manufacturers in the agriculture industry stemmed from the initial mission of the USDA at its founding. The UDSA had been originated by Abraham Lincoln as an agency designed to advocate for the American farmer. Many of the future allegiances and partialities that the department showed toward the food manufacturing industry harkened back to the organization’s original founding as a service to protect those in the agrarian industry.

But Dr. Wiley believed that the modern food manufacturing industry was a bastardization of the formerly pure and holistic agrarian practices through which Americans once nourished themselves. Dr. Wiley asserted that he was protecting the consumer, the true American farmer, and later those ethical food manufacturers who emerged by preventing food adulterers from passing off adulterated fruits, vegetables, and animal products as the genuine article. Dr. Wiley felt that the more the American people understood about the processes their groceries went through before they reached their table, the more they would demand safer regulations. This, he felt, would result in economic benefits for those farmers who provided food and services ethically. The insistence that Wiley dismiss Alexander Wedderburn was only the beginning of censorship of the information that Wiley believed Americans were entitled to. He believed that his bureau bore a responsibility as a public entity to share their findings to the public, whom they serve.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text