logo

49 pages 1 hour read

Kazuo Ishiguro

The Remains of the Day

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1989

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Dignity

The Remains of the Day is driven by Stevens’s conception of dignity. Stevens believes a butler’s job is to embody a certain definition of dignity or, at the very least, to strive toward such an ideal. To Stevens, dignity is difficult to define but very palpably felt. Dignity involves complete dedication to one’s profession, rejection of emotional distractions, high professional standards, and respect for discretion and stoicism. Stevens believes a butler should be calm, tactful, respectful, and circumspect, even under a huge amount of pressure. His desire to embody this form of dignity causes him many problems in his life. It prevents him from speaking truthfully to his father, stops him from confessing his love to Miss Kenton, and hinders his understanding that Lord Darlington is being manipulated by the Nazis. The very force that gives Stevens purpose in his life is, by the time the novel takes place, the same force that now compels him to wonder whether he wasted his life. The novel is Stevens’s subtle rumination on whether his long-held conception of dignity is as vapid and worthless as he now fears.

A key element of Stevens’s interpretation of dignity is service. He dedicates his life to serving Lord Darlington because he believes serving a good and moral person is key to being dignified. This definition of dignity reveals one of the fundamental limitations in Stevens’s view of the world: he cannot imagine succeeding on his own. Stevens believes in a form of dignity that is subservient to another person. He cannot be dignified without serving someone, so he must fully invest himself in Lord Darlington as a way to achieve his ambition. When Lord Darlington is publicly disgraced, Stevens’s life suddenly seems very undignified. His new employer is a very different person, and Stevens cannot satisfy Mr. Farraday’s wishes as he did with Darlington. The definition of dignity—which once seemed immutable to Stevens—changes and evolves. As a result, Stevens is forced to reckon with a new reality. The ideas he took to be objectively true and dependable are suddenly very different in this brave new world. A quiet, dignified life now seems like a waste, and Stevens is plunged into an existential crisis.

Stevens’s crisis takes him on a journey to meet Miss Kenton. While on this journey, he is forced to reckon with different definitions of dignity. One of these competing definitions comes from a working-class man named Harry Smith, who claims that dignity comes from anyone who exercises their democratic power by voting to help their country. This definition is starkly different from Stevens’s definition. Smith views dignity as a communal effort in which the power of even the poorest man is comparable to that of the richest man. To Stevens, dignity was a deeply individual pursuit that could only be achieved by dedicating his life to a rich man. Though their accents and clothes may differ, both Smith and Stevens are working-class men. Their different definitions of dignity are examples of the changing nature of the British class system. In a post-World War II society, Smith’s working-class ambitions are more in tune with the contemporary culture, whereas Stevens’s views seem dated, restrictive, and inherently pessimistic by comparison. Stevens declines to argue with Smith, and by the novel's end, he does not change his mind. He does, however, change his perspective and comes to understand that his definition of dignity was not as indomitable as it once was.

Communication Failure

Stevens is so dedicated to his principles that he struggles to communicate with others. His relationships with Miss Kenton and his father are defined by unspoken emotions, not because those emotions do not exist but because the characters struggle to put their emotions into words without breaking the rules they have set for themselves. Stevens believes dignity involves a quiet stoicism that demands that he suffer in silence. Thus, he cannot confess his love for Miss Kenton without breaking his rules about professionalism. He cannot doubt his employer Lord Darlington without contravening his beliefs about service. He cannot tell his father that he loves him without breaking the rigid walls of silence they have erected between them throughout their lives. Stevens’s inability to address his feelings leads to his unhappiness. He cannot properly say goodbye to his father and never tells Miss Kenton how he truly feels. He represses his emotions in a desperate bid to maintain his dignity, even though he is increasingly concerned that this behavior is a mistake. Stevens provides plenty of details as the narrator, but he changes the subject whenever his emotions are called into question. Even when talking privately to the reader, he maintains an air of professional decorum that is never broken. The reader discovers that Stevens is crying, for example, when another character offers him a handkerchief, rather than Stevens confessing that he feels sad. Stevens polices the boundaries of his emotions so forcefully that their absence makes them all the more distinct. The irony of Stevens’s communication failures is that by not communicating his emotions at all, he happens to reveal them. Stevens’s communication failure—at least in the context of his narration—becomes a demonstration of emotion as described by negative space, in which the unspoken but keenly felt sentiments are made all the more distinct by their absence.

Stevens learns this behavior from his father. William is remarkably similar to his son in this respect, but as he approaches death, he becomes direct in his emotions. Before he dies, he tells Stevens he is proud and confesses that he has feared his competency as a father. William’s deathbed conversation reveals how deeply ingrained these tendencies have become in father and son. Only death can shake William from his convictions, adding greater poignancy to the emotional outburst. Only when he thinks he has no more life left to live is William able to talk about his existence in a free, unreserved manner. William dies after a lifetime of silence between him and his son, with only a brief burst of emotional honesty at the very end redeeming his lifetime of regrettable communication failure.

Miss Kenton suffers from communications problems of her own. Like Stevens, she is invested in an idea of professionalism that prevents her from embracing her feelings. She loves Stevens, but she fears declaring her love and being rejected. She tries to prompt him to show that he feels the same way, but she lacks the communicative tools to do so. Whether she is bringing flowers to his room, asking about his book, or threatening to quit, she cannot elicit a response from Stevens. Eventually, she tells him that a man has proposed to her. When he still does not react, she tells him that she has accepted the proposal. This ruse fails in that Stevens does not react. Miss Kenton accidentally marries a man due to her failure to communicate directly with Stevens. Fortunately for her, she learns to love her husband. Ultimately, neither she nor Stevens gets what they truly want. They are punished for their failure to communicate, but they manage to find what relief they can in the lives they are forced to lead.

Remorse

The inevitable result of Stevens’s unique ideas about dignity and his struggle to communicate is remorse. As such, The Remains of the Day should be viewed less as a journal than a confession. Stevens never completely drops his dignified, stoic persona, but the act of narration itself is a quest to undo the feelings of pain and regret that he cannot hide any longer. Stevens is reckoning with his past failures, interrogating himself and his past to understand whether his life has value and meaning. The only way for him to move forward is to look back at the most regrettable moments of his life. His service to Lord Darlington, his final days with his father, and his unrequited love affair with Miss Kenton form the foundation of his remorse. However, Stevens subtly probes his entire ethos and personality, explaining his belief system to the reader so that he can assure himself that he still believes what he believes. Even if Stevens does not explicitly state that he is feeling remorse, his need to review his life and travel so far to meet Miss Kenton suggests that this feeling is very much present in his life.

The kernel of Stevens’s remorse is his dignity. He has spent so long aspiring toward a platonic ideal of a butler—a dignified man—that he did not notice his mistakes. Lord Darlington is now disgraced, and, on several occasions, Stevens denies having worked for the man who is now commonly regarded as a fascist. Even if Stevens insists that he is proud to have worked for Lord Darlington, his actions speak louder than his words. He denies his service to a disgraced public figure because to confess to this in public would be to admit that he failed to see that he was working for a fascist. Stevens prided himself on ignoring politics and focusing on Lord Darlington’s good intentions. As the world now frequently tells him, this is impossible. Stevens feels remorse not necessarily for serving Lord Darlington but for investing himself so completely in a man who was not as moral, intelligent, or upstanding as Stevens believed him to be. Lord Darlington’s downfall also collapsed Stevens’s firm beliefs about dignity, and by the time the book takes place, Stevens is remorseful about the degree to which he dedicated his life to someone who was not worthy.

Stevens’s journey into his remorse ends in failure. He meets with Miss Kenton, and she insists that she is happy with her husband, so she cannot accept his job offer. During his journey, he is repeatedly reminded that his life’s service was dedicated to a man who did not deserve it. Despite these bitter reminders about the remorse of his past, Stevens sees a flicker of optimism. The world has changed, but he decides he can also change. He decides to return to Darlington Hall and work on his banter, thereby becoming the kind of butler that—he believes—Mr. Farraday will appreciate. The failure of the ending is not that Stevens decides to change. His character growth is sympathetic and optimistic. The tragedy of Stevens’s decision is that, once again, he is dedicating himself to the service of another individual rather than himself. Stevens’s remorse stems from his ideas about service and dignity, which always leave him at the behest of another person. He willfully abandons the agency of his life and then regrets the missed opportunities that this decision forces upon him. Stevens’s decision to change his personality to suit Farraday will likely lead to a similar period of remorse in the future. This time, however, Stevens’s increasing age means that he will have less time to reflect and even less time to implement changes. After his remorseful journey, Stevens fails to learn the right lessons and commits himself to a remorse-filled future.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text