57 pages • 1 hour read
Sinuhe, R.B. Parkinson (Translator)A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The conventions of literary narratives in ancient Egypt take a different approach than do modern works in portraying characters. While Sinuhe, the protagonist of “The Tale of Sinuhe,” is portrayed as a distinct person who narrates a first-person story about his experience, he also serves as a representation of the larger moral, which is about the place of the individual in Egyptian society, the importance of loyalty to the king, and the experiences of exile and the longing for home. Sinuhe’s responses to the twists and turns of his circumstances are meant to model appropriate beliefs and behavior while providing dramatic incidents to entertain the listening audience.
Sinuhe’s most important quality is his loyalty, which expresses itself in deference to the new king and his household as well as to Amunenshi, the Syrian king who gives Sinuhe a place in his new society. Sinuhe demonstrates this loyalty when he praises the new Egyptian king to Amunenshi and offers a deferential response when the Egyptian king summons him home. Sinuhe earns his regard from both his kings by loyal service in his role, which includes warfare and protecting the royal children, a position of high status and great trust.
Sinuhe performs his expected duties as a high-ranking official in his new life: He provides charity to the less fortunate, ensures that justice is done when a crime like robbery occurs, and is a good steward of his household, as his family and property grow large. He shows no fear when challenged by the Syrian champion but instead fights fiercely. He has earned such respect that all of Retjenu is on his side rather than that of the challenger. Sinuhe shows respect to his superiors and satisfaction, but not arrogance, at his rewards.
At the end of his tale, his return to Egypt repairs the mourning he felt at being separated from his homeland and shows his preference for Egyptian customs and beliefs. In introducing his tales with his titles, Sinuhe stresses that he is a follower of the king, “whom he loves” (27), suggesting his loyalty and deference are freely offered.
Khunanup, the protagonist of “The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant,” is immediately presented as a man of sense when he checks the family’s store of food, deciding what to take with him and how much to leave behind to support the household while he is gone. Though described as a peasant, the amount and variety of goods he has to trade—enough to require several donkeys to carry the load—suggest that Khunanup is relatively prosperous, if not of high status. Like Sinuhe he is deferential to authority, answering with the standard response of the subservient, “my way is good,” when he is accosted by Nemtinakht (76n6).
The peasant has a strong sense of justice and is not afraid to protest immediately when he perceives that Nemtinakht is making an unfair suggestion by proposing, because his donkey ate a mouthful of grain, to take the donkey with all its baggage. This suggests that, as a trader, the peasant is fair in his transactions. When Nemtinakht takes all his goods, the peasant follows the established channels in his appeals to authority: He approaches Nemtinakht first to request fair treatment, and when that is unsuccessful, he asks to speak with an official near the high steward before approaching Rensi directly.
Though the source or extent of his education is unknown, the peasant exhibits the ideal of perfect speech in the rhetorical sophistication of his appeals. His perception of the role of the official in upholding truth reflects his adherence to the ordering principles of Egyptian society. He resents when his petitions are met with silence or, in one case, a beating, but instead of retaliating with violence, he continues to press his case with speech. His tone is by turns lamenting, exasperated, and reproachful, reflecting the frustration of an intelligent, law-abiding man who does not see justice being done.
The peasant’s reply to the final arbitration of his dispute is not given, so the reader does not know how he receives the news of his turn of fortune. Nevertheless, his case is both proof of the king’s authority and a suggestion that decorum in action, as well as eloquence in speech, will ultimately be rewarded.
The speaker and protagonist of his tale, the sailor shows the same deference to the structures of Egyptian authority as that demonstrated by Sinuhe and the eloquent peasant, but there is a hint that the sailor’s personality is a bit more heedless and self-seeking. His attempt to counsel his employer, the count, through means of an entertaining tale is not at all taken in the spirit in which it was given, suggesting either the count’s irritability or something amiss in the sailor’s delivery: A fractious relationship is hinted at in his complaint to his employer, “It is tiresome to speak to you” (92).
After his ship is wrecked, the sailor is resourceful enough to make himself a shelter of wood, but he hides there for three days and “embraced the shadows” (93) in distress or fear. The sailor displays proper reverence for his spiritual beliefs; once he ventures out and finds plenty, he makes an offering to the gods, and when the serpent appears, he recognizes a divine or magical being and prostrates himself in obedience.
With the serpent as with the count, the sailor’s efforts to provide service are not entirely successful. The sailor seems to speak past or not recognize the serpent’s advice to return home and cherish his family when he proceeds with promises to make the serpent known to the Egyptian king. When he praises the serpent to the crew who finds him, the sailor demonstrates the proper observance of a subject’s relationship to a ruler. However, the count’s rebuke to the sailor, which mirrors the serpent’s minor reproof, suggests the sailor might sometimes be cocky in his delivery. The count scolds him, “Don’t act clever” (97), suggesting that the sailor might have a tendency to ignore good advice he is given.
The serpent in “The Tale of the Shipwrecked Sailor” functions as an earthly ruler or king, as well as a semi-divine being or other representation of the gods. He also serves as a mentor to the sailor.
He demonstrates the instructive and consolatory purposes of narrative in the tragic story he tells of how he lost all his kin, save for his daughter, when a star fell and burned all the other serpents. As a ruler, he appears both wise and just, for his island prospers and is full of good things. However, the serpent also foresees, and tells the sailor with a touch of lament, that the island will sink beneath the sea—a warning that all things on earth are mutable and can pass away. Despite this, the serpent is protective of his realm, and angrily confronts the sailor at their first meeting, but he shows himself to be a generous ruler when he gives the sailor riches to take with him back to Egypt. More than just a character, the serpent symbolizes divine power and the inevitable cycle of life.
The first king of the 12th Dynasty, Amenemhat I, makes multiple appearances throughout the poetry collected in the volume, suggesting the lasting influence of his historical role and his legacy as a figure of legend.
In his first appearance in “The Tale of Sinuhe,” the king’s passing leaves an opening for instability, as the twilight period between the king’s death and his son’s ascension leaves a temporary vacuum of power, especially due to the fact he was assassinated. Aside from the possibility that he might be implicated, Sinuhe’s terror-stricken response might also represent a fear that the death of Amenemhat would endanger the union he had established between Upper and Lower Egypt.
In “The Words of Neferti,” the sage describes Ameny (thought to be a reference to Amenemhat) as a child of Southern Egypt who will unite the Two Powers. Neferti describes a figure of strength who will quell rebellions, build a fortress, earn respect and obeisance from foreign powers, and make his subjects joyful. “The Teaching of King Amenemhat” acknowledges this reputation but also portrays the king as a more anxious figure. He emphasizes that he was a just ruler who protected and provided for his subjects, but he also expresses bitterness that those whom he fed and sheltered plotted against him and attacked him while he slept.
Along with the tone of lament and the reminder of all that Amenemhat accomplished, the king expresses the pride of a father in affirming his son’s fitness for his new role and the hope that the new king will build on the foundation his father has left. The wisdom and concern of his subjects that Amenemhat demonstrates shows him to be a model of a wise king, thereby contrasting with the more foolish figure of King Cheops in “The Tales of King Cheops’ Court,” where the king seems largely concerned with his own entertainment.