logo

46 pages 1 hour read

Anonymous, Transl. Juan Mascaró

The Upanishads

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | BCE

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 11-13Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 11 Summary: “Chandogya Upanishad”

All words originate and come to their ends in space. The universe began when the creator Prajapati meditated. As he meditated, the Vedas and three sounds were created: BHUR (earth), BHUVAS (air), and SVAR (sky). From these sounds came OM, which encompasses the “whole universe” (113). Brahman is infinite, with a quarter of himself representing the universe and the remainder embodying the “heaven of Immortality” (113).

Next, the author describes the light that transcends even the heavens as the light “that shines in our heart” (113). Brahman is the universe and everything in it, while the essence of humanity is faith. The Spirit “contains all works and desires and all perfumes and all tastes” and the sage Sandilya claims that he will go to Brahman, “when I go beyond this life” (114). The next part is a poem where the speaker talks of going to the “imperishable Treasure” and the spirits of life, earth, air, and the heavens “by his grace” (114).

A person’s lifetime is compared to a sacrifice, with the first 24 years of a life representing the morning offering of “Soma-wine” (115), the next 44 years the midday offering, and the next 48 years the evening offering. In the “inner world” Brahman is “consciousness.” In the “outer world,” Brahman embodies “space” (115). The author suggests that one meditate on each of these points.

A child named Satyakama wanted to become a student and asked his mother from what family he came from, but the mother could not answer. When the sage he wanted to study under, Gautama, asked Satyakama about his family, he admitted he did not know. Gautama replied that he was a Brahmin since “thou hast not gone away from truth” (116). 

Another student, Svetaketu Aruneya, was overly prideful. His father attempted to humble him by asking if he knew the “knowledge” that “what is not heard is heard, what is not thought, and not known is known” (116-117). Sevtaketu’s father then explained that by knowing a piece of gold, some clay, or a piece of iron, one knows all gold, clay, or iron since “any differences are only words” (117). Later, Svetaketu’s father demonstrated how one cannot see the origin of new life within a seed from a banyan tree, or taste salt that is dissolved in water. He compared that to Spirit, which is present but invisible. The father compared life to being blindfolded and left stranded in a desert and needing to ask the people of villages where to go. Similarly, people need guidance from the wise to find spirit.

Meditation is deemed “higher than thought” (119). Next, there is a series of statements that use contradictions to explain the nature of key concepts. For example, without truth there is no knowledge, without progress there is no faith, and without joy there is no creation (119). Atman is also the Spirit and encompasses the universe. If one knows the Atman, then he “becomes a Master of himself” (120). However, those who remain dependent on material things will never gain freedom.

Within each person is a “small shrine in the form of a lotus-flower” (120) where Brahman/the Atman dwell. It does not die when the body dies. The love of the Atman is Truth. Since even good deeds that people do fade in time, what does have lasting consequence is whether or not a person discovers the Atman and the Truth it represents. The Atman is the “bridge between time and Eternity” (121) and, because of the purity of the Atman, sin and evil cannot cross over into eternity. One “must find his own Soul” (121) to understand Truth.

Learning this, once all the gods and the devils tried to find the Atman. To do this, the god Indra and the devil Virochana went to the creator Prajapati to become his students. Prajapati had them look in their reflections, once unadorned and once in beautiful clothing, which led them to understand that their reflections revealed Brahman. However, Virochana mistakenly thought the lesson was that one should glorify their own bodies. On the other hand, Indra thought that the lesson was incomplete, thinking only that Atman dies along with the body. 

Indra returned to and studied under Prajapati several times, until Prajapati taught that the body is mortal but the Spirit is immortal. By knowing the Spirit, one is free from “the bondage of pleasure and pain” and can find “the land of infinite liberty” (125). Further, when someone thinks and feels, it is truly the Spirit that does so. Indra taught this knowledge to the gods, which is why they dwell in bliss and fulfillment contemplating “the Infinite Spirit Supreme” (126).

Chapter 12 Summary: “Brihad-Aranyaka Upanishad”

The universe is composed of three aspects: “[N]ame, form, and action” (127). These are made possible by the word, the eye, and the body respectively, and Brahman is what is behind all three.

A Brahmin named Gargya visited a king named Ajatasatru and offered to teach him about Brahman. Gargya preached that Brahman was the spirits in the sun, the moon, lightning, “ethereal spaces” (128), the wind, fire, water, a mirror, the sound of people walking, the heavens, a shadow, and the human body. At each point, Ajatasataru replied that he only considered those things that are provided by the gods or comprise different parts of life things to be admired or feared. After Gargya finished and said this was the sum of all his knowledge, Ajatasataru replied, “If this is all, we know nothing” (129). 

After that, Gargya offered to become Ajatasataru’s pupil, even though it was rare for a Brahmin to be the student of a Kshatriya (the royal and warrior class in Hindu culture). Ajatasatru asked Gargya where a person’s consciousness goes when they are asleep. When Gargya said he did not know, Ajatasatru explained that a soul goes to the “land of dreams” (129) and rests with Brahman, who exists inside the heart.

The sage Yajñavalkya told his wife Maitreyi that he planned to retire to a life of quiet contemplation. While he declared that he would leave her with his material possessions, still “there is no hope of life eternal” (130) in wealth. In response, Maitreyi begged her husband to give her his knowledge instead of his wealth. Yajñavalkya told her that love for one’s wife, children, material goods, religion, power, the heavens, the gods, and animals is not enough, but they also have to be loved for the presence of the Spirit within them. All these things “rest on the Soul” (131). Then Yajñavalkya taught that “after death there is no consciousness” (132) because, when liberated, the individual spirit dissolves into the Spirit like salt in water.

Chapter 13 Summary: “The Supreme Teaching”

The king Janaka asked a series of questions to the sage Yajñavalkya. When asked what is “the light of man” (133), Yajñavalkya replied that it is the sun and the moon because those lights determine a person’s activities. When there is no moon and sun and the person is asleep, then their light is the Soul. 

Janaka then asked what the Soul is. Yajñavalkya answered that the Soul “is the consciousness of life” (134) which exists in the material world, the spiritual world, and the world of dreams. Dreams are made by people themselves using “materials from this all-containing world” (134), which reflects how the Creator is within all people as well. This is also why a person should not be woken up quickly because they could be injured by being awakened before the Spirit fully returns.

Deep sleep is a “place of rest” for the Soul, where it experiences “no desires” (135), no despair, and no sensations. Also, there is “no duality” (136), such as when one is in “the world of Brahman” (137). There, when an individual soul becomes one with Spirit, that individual’s joy is even greater than that of a wealthy person or even the gods themselves.

When a body dies, the Spirit “returns by the same way to life, wherefrom he came” (138). The author compares the process of dying to when a king is welcomed by his court and a village. Similarly, the “powers of life” (138) assemble to accompany the Spirit as it merges with the consciousness of Brahman. Drawing from the “wisdom and works” from its former life, the Soul seeks out a new, better form “like that of the ancestors in heaven,” the “celestial beings” (139), the gods, or the creator god Brahma himself.

Karma is the principle which dictates one’s fate. If one’s actions are good or evil, that determines what a person becomes. This is because human beings are “made of desire” (140), which shapes their faith, and their faith shapes their deeds. When someone is free of desire for material things, their only desire is for the Spirit. This allows them to become one with the Spirit after death. Likewise, if someone succumbs to “unwisdom,” then they can end up in “worlds of no joy, regions of utter darkness” (141). Knowledge of the true Self, the Atman, God, and that there is oneness instead of a plurality are necessary to avoid such a fate.

Brahman is sought through “holy sacrifices, charity, penance and abstinence” (142). The sages who best sought Brahman did not seek to have families or material wealth, and instead lived like “pilgrims” (142). The person who becomes one with Brahman is free from evil, sin, and fear.

Chapters 11-13 Analysis

These chapters explain the concept of karma, a major part of The Importance of Knowledge in Spiritual Liberation. Desire for material possessions and family life causes one to remain in the cycle of death and reincarnation. Karma also dictates the form one takes in their next life, whether they become a plant, another human, or a celestial being. By focusing one’s thoughts and desires on Brahman and on ritual and moral actions, one achieves unity with Brahman. 

One reason for this process is that one’s thoughts and actions shape one’s mind and soul. Another is that the purity of Brahman destroys evil and sin. The “Supreme Teaching” describes the sage who reaches Brahman as someone who “is not moved by evil: he removes evil. He is not burned by sin: he burns all sin. And he goes beyond evil, beyond passion, and beyond doubts, for he sees the Eternal” (143). These concepts carry the implication that evil and material disasters are distractions or deceptive in a way. Unity with Brahman is the truth that lies beyond the material world, even though Brahman also encompasses the physical realm as well as the spiritual one.

Another paradox is that this true knowledge of Brahmin is both within and beyond comprehension as well as both simple and complex. Earlier, the “Kena Upanishad” spells out this idea when it states, “He is unknown to the learned and known to the simple” (51) and “I do not imagine I know him well, and yet I cannot say I know him not” (52). This is the point behind the “Brihad-Aranyaka Upanishad’s” account of the king Ajatasatru and the sage Gargya. Here, it is a sage who learns from someone outside the priestly caste, instead of being the one to instruct them. Likewise, it is Ajatasatru who points out that he and Gargya know “nothing” (129). However, it is significant that Gargya has the humility to accept instruction from someone he sought to teach.

Such knowledge is linked to morality. The Upanishads refer to the The Guidance of Ethical Principles. Referring to the soul destined to achieve unity with Brahman, both “wisdom and works take him by the hand, and the knowledge known of old” (139). However, the “Chandogya Upanishad” also emphasizes that works like charity are not enough. It reads, “And even as here on earth all work done in time ends in time, so in the worlds to come even the good works of the past pass away” (121). Moral behavior is important under the principle of karma. Even if moral and charitable actions alone are not enough to guarantee the liberation of one’s soul and unity with Brahman, it is nonetheless necessary for ensuring that one’s soul is as pure as possible. 

This is made apparent with the “Supreme Teaching”’s definition of karma: “He that does good becomes good; he that does evil becomes evil. By pure actions he becomes pure; by evil actions he becomes evil” (140). Rather than seeing ethical and moral behavior as subservient or less important than spiritual knowledge, the Upanishads instead present morality and spiritual enlightenment as inseparable. This is what is meant with the statements, “As his faith is, so are his works. As his works are, so he becomes” (140).

Moral behavior and spiritual enlightenment also have an emotional dimension. The association of Brahmin and knowledge of spiritual unity with “joy” (138) and ignorance with “worlds of no joy” (141) is key to the Upanishads’ understanding of good, evil, and why the good should be pursued by every individual. In short, good actions are the path to happiness, spiritual enlightenment, and wisdom. On the other hand, evil actions lead to misery, fear, ignorance, and an unending cycle of death.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text