logo

46 pages 1 hour read

Anonymous, Transl. Juan Mascaró

The Upanishads

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | BCE

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Ultimate Reality Within the Individual

Throughout the Upanishads, the texts push forward the concept that God, Brahman, or the Spirit simultaneously exists within and beyond the universe and everything in it. One passage conveying this view says, “In space he is the sun, and he is the wind and the sky; at the altar he is the priest, and the Soma wine in the jar. He dwells in men and in gods, in righteousness and in the vast heavens” (63). The Upanishads thus also seek to explain how this ultimate reality dwells within the individual.

In the text, Brahman is sometimes personified as an entity that can be interacted with and, at least in Juan Mascaró’s translation, is gendered as “he.” However, Brahman is not a god or God in the basic monotheistic sense, as in Judaism, Islam, or Christianity. It is perhaps best understood as a force that permeates all reality and all life, rather than an entity that exists separately from the universe and from living beings: “All this universe is in truth Brahman” (114). This is what the authors of the Upanishads mean when they stress unity and state “there is no duality” (136).

Brahman manifests within an individual as the Atman, which is the eternal or spiritual Self. The Atman is not something separate from Brahman, because nothing and no one is separate from Brahman: “What you see when you look into another person’s eyes, that is the Atman, immortal, beyond fear, that is Brahman” (122). In the Upanishads, one of the authors defines the Atman this way: “Concealed in the heart of all beings is the Atman, the Spirit, the Self; smaller than the smallest atom, greater than the vast spaces” (59). Although the Atman is best understood in Western terms as an individual living being’s soul, it is still a part of the ultimate reality and universal unity. 

Sometimes the Upanishads treat Atman and Brahman/Spirit/God as practically synonymous, such as here: “Brahman is all and Atman is Brahman” (83). In fact, the “Brihad-Aranyaka Upanishad” compares the fate of the soul after death to a “lump of salt […] thrown into water and therein being dissolved” (132) because the individual soul unites with Brahman. To understand concepts like Brahman and the Atman, it is important to remember the concept of cosmic and divine unity described in the Upanishads, which truly encompasses everything. In this sense, Brahman and the ultimate, all-encompassing reality it represents dwells within the individual, and the individual will be fully subsumed into that ultimate reality after death.

The Importance of Knowledge in Spiritual Liberation

Knowledge and ignorance are important because, according to the Upanishads, they determine an individual’s fate after death. They state that, “Ignorance passes away and knowledge is immortal” (93), meaning that ignorance leads to reincarnation or passing into “regions of utter darkness” (49). On the other hand, knowledge causes one to achieve “liberation” and become free from “sorrows,” “bondage” (63), and “fear” (60). The texts thus stress the importance of knowledge in spiritual liberation. 

It is true that action, meaning correct adherence to religious rituals, is important. The “Isa Upanishad” states, “He who knows both knowledge and action, with action overcomes death and with knowledge reaches immortality” (49). However, along with other actions such as “meditation” and yoga, and virtues such as “self-control” and “humanity” (109), ritual is a tool for achieving knowledge of Brahman. The authors of the Upanishads are consistent in stressing that the ultimate goal is knowledge of Brahman or the Spirit. More specifically, the “Mundaka Upanishad” distinguishes between “higher” and “lower” wisdom. Lower wisdom includes the rituals and hymns from the other Vedas, while higher wisdom “is that which leads to the Eternal” (73). In other words, lower wisdom is still beneficial, but only higher wisdom will lead to liberation after death.

Exactly what form this liberation will take is unclear in the Upanishads, beyond the fact that it would entail freedom from the cycle of death and reincarnation. The “Kena Upanishad” promises, “Those who follow wisdom pass beyond and, on leaving this world, become immortal” (51). Another possibility is the one presented in the “Brihad-Aranyaka Upanishad,” whose author argues that “there is no consciousness after death” since the individual’s soul merges with the “ocean of pure consciousness boundless and infinite” (132). However one interprets the concept, the Upanishads is consistent in arguing that liberation will mean a permanent end to desire and negative emotions.

Still, the “Mundaka Upanishad” is clear that piously following religious ritual and even doing moral actions are not sufficient to achieve spiritual liberation. As the author writes, “Ritual and charity is not enough” (77). Ignorance or “unwisdom” (80) also comes from the desire for material possessions, or “the path of pleasure” which is taken by “the fool” (58). To avoid ignorance, one must develop an interior awareness that evolves into knowledge of Brahman and the Atman through “renunciation” (81) of material desires and “meditation and contemplation” (85). In doing so, the wise individual will liberate themselves from material desires while alive and escape the cycle of reincarnation after death.

The Cyclical Nature of Life and Death

In the Hindu beliefs expressed in the Upanishads, souls are often reincarnated in a cycle of death and rebirth. The process is termed “samsara” or “the transmigration of life” (103). The Upanishads also suggest a soul may at least temporarily become trapped in “worlds of no joy, regions of utter darkness” (141). If one instead reincarnates, one could be reborn as a human, but also as a non-human like a plant (64) or as one of the “celestial beings” or gods (137). The Upanishads thus frequently explore the cyclical nature of life and death in various ways.

The cycle is compared to “a caterpillar, when coming to the end of a blade of grass, reaches out to another blade of grass and draws itself over to it” because it is “the same way the Soul, leaving the body and unwisdom behind, reaches out to another body and draws itself over to it” (139). The entire cycle is also part of how Brahman operates: “He is God who spreads the net of transmigration and then withdraws it in the field of life” (93). Elsewhere, the cycle of life and death is called “the bondage of time” which is contrasted against “freedom in Eternity” (96).

What drives this cycle is essentially one’s mindset throughout one’s life. According to the “Maitri Upanishad,” samsara “takes place in one’s own mind” (103). The effect that one’s behavior and thoughts in life have on one’s fate after death is called “the law of Karma” (79). This is described in “The Supreme Teaching” as: “According as a man acts and walks in the path of life, so he becomes. He that does good becomes good; he that does evil becomes evil. By pure actions he becomes pure; by evil actions he becomes evil” (140). This cycle is endless unless one achieves “liberation” (63) through spiritual awareness and moral action that allows one to reach unity with Brahman. The “Prasna Upanishad” compares such liberation to when a snake sheds its skin. When this happens, “he goes to the heaven of Brahma where from he can behold the Spirit that dwells in the city of the human body and which is above the highest life” (73). 

In sum, the importance of the internal state of a mind explains both how karma operates and how a soul can achieve liberation. If one continues to have desires for possessions in the material world, or even just for a family and children (69), then one becomes reborn in the material world. On the other hand, having a mind that is “ever pure” (61) of material desires,  committed to aestheticism, and filled with knowledge of Brahman, will lead one to become one with Brahman.

The Guidance of Ethical Principles

The Upanishads stress that good moral and ethical behavior is not enough to ensure that a soul transcends the otherwise endless cycle of reincarnation. One also must have “right understanding” (60) and “sacred knowledge” (109) of Brahman and the unity of all life and the universe. Even adherence to the correct religious rituals and charitable actions are no substitute for such awareness. In the “Mundaka Upanishad,” it states, “Imagining religious ritual and gifts of charity as the final good, the unwise see not the Path supreme” (77). However, this does not mean that the Upanishads do not also suggest moral principles that the reader should strive to follow. Instead, they present following the guidance of moral principles as an important part of living and acting well.

The “Taittiriya Upanishad” lists the virtues of “Righteousness,” “Truth” “Self-control,” “Peace,” and “Humanity” and describes them as “needful.” At the same time, each virtue is listed alongside “sacred learning and teaching” (109). This suggests that such moral behavior is intertwined with, and inseparable from, spiritual education and awareness, along with the practices of meditation and religious ritual.

The concept of Karma itself provides a powerful reason for moral and ethical behavior. How one behaves and even thinks throughout one’s life affects how one is reincarnated in the next life, or whether or not one’s soul breaks free from the cycle of reincarnation entirely and unites with Brahman after death. The Upanishads themselves state, “Reaching the end of the journey begun by his works on earth, from that world a man returns to this world of human action” (140). As Juan Mascaró describes this principle in his Introduction, “There is a law of cause and effect in the moral world” (13). At the very least, evil behavior is an impediment to spiritual self-knowledge. 

The “Katha Upanishad” explicitly states that one cannot gain awareness of one’s Atman, and hence awareness of Brahman, unless “evil ways are abandoned” (60). Since Brahman embodies purity, “evil or sin cannot cross that bridge” which leads to “Eternity” (121). While “good actions” lead “to the heaven of purity,” “evil actions” bring one “to the hell of evil” (70). It is by embracing knowledge of the Atman and Brahman through spiritual discipline that one overcomes evil. The “Svetasvatara Upanishad” states that Brahman and knowledge of it “takes away evil” (95). 

Nonetheless, the goal of “liberation” (63) from the cycle of life and death for the “wise seer” is that he “leaves good and evil behind and in purity […] does to the unity supreme” (80). Still, karma dictates that one should always act with morality and piety, and that one is helped in doing so by spiritual knowledge.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text