logo

46 pages 1 hour read

Holly Renee

The Veiled Kingdom

Fiction | Novel | YA | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Contrast between Tyranny and Leadership

While despots like King Roan seek only to dominate their subjects, ideal leaders feel a strong sense of responsibility to perform well in their roles, and they strive to make decisions that will improve the lives of others. Throughout the tumultuous events of The Veiled Kingdom, several different characters display a complex mixture of tyranny and leadership, and their desire for power often conflicts with their responsibilities toward those under their command. King Roan is the clearest example of a leader who is at heart a despotic, power-hungry tyrant. As Dacre notes in the city in Marmoris, the king’s palace stands as a grandiose symbol of power that presents “a stark contrast to the plight of the king’s subjects” (22). Even in the novel’s beginning chapters, Holly Renee emphasizes that the palace represents King Roan’s cruelty, for his life of luxury is built upon the suffering and starvation of the citizens who must offer up what little magic they have in the tithe. The palace towers above the city and its citizens just as King Roan’s power dwarfs the limited lives of the citizens and the rebels.

As a lifelong target of her father’s abuse, Nyra understands the depths of King Roan’s greed, but joining the rebellion gives her a new measure of perspective. She realizes that although her father rips away power from his subjects, that power is no guarantee of his safety. As the narrative states, “Everything [King Roan] had taken from them may not have been enough. The man had everything, and still, it wasn’t enough to protect him when his people finally decided to fight back” (200). The raid in the palace is successful because enough of the rebels rise up together to strike against King Roan. Thus, although he has hoarded magical and political power, he does not fulfill the honorable responsibilities of leadership, and his cruelty compels his subjects to band together in a united attempt to destroy him.

While King Roan stands as the ultimate villain of the story, the rebel leaders’ approach to wielding power is far more nuanced, if not entirely flawless. For example, Dacre clearly feels the obligations of leadership and strives to treat his people fairly, although he is not entirely immune to the siren song of power. Unlike the king, he takes a more thoughtful approach to the topic, paying heed to the warnings inherent in the failed leaders of the past. As he muses while raiding the palace, “Power was meant to be controlled, but far too often it became […] the master. […] Our kingdom was built on men who were slaves to power” (30). These inner contemplations indicate that he sees King Roan and other past leaders as being addicted to the power of leadership while remaining indifferent to the responsibilities that such leadership requires. By contrast, Dacre is deeply attuned to these responsibilities, which he often considers to be a burden.

This is a weight that King Roan does not feel because he does not believe that he is obligated to care for his subjects. Instead, he maintains the misguided and entitled opinion that his subjects have obligations toward him. These two examples of leaders illustrate the connections and dichotomies between power and responsibility.

The Impact of Dysfunctional Family Dynamics

Both protagonists are powerfully influenced by their upbringing and by the ongoing pressures they feel due to their family dynamics and legacy. Specifically, the novel explores the various ways in which parents’ unreasonable demands can damage the psyches of adult offspring. As the interwoven plots of The Veiled Kingdom unfold, it is clear that Nyra and Dacre both have difficult relationships with their fathers, and they also grieve the loss of their respective mothers. These traumatic experiences and fraught relationships inform their worldviews and influence their most impulsive choices.

Nyra is a prime example of this dynamic, for even before she becomes embroiled in the complexities of the rebellion, she has been deeply traumatized by her relationship with her parents, and particularly her father. When she was young, she believed that her father kept her locked away from the world to keep her safe, but she later realizes the truth, and her utter sense of betrayal takes center stage as she laments:

I had spent far too many years mistaking his disgrace for vigilance. My parents lost hope that the heir to their throne would have power […]. I could still remember the fear and concern in their eyes when they told me that we must keep the secret between us, but that concern died long before my mother. My father had become void of his care for me, and it was resentment that stared back (2).

This passage reveals the depths of her father’s betrayal, for even as an adult, Nyra retains the shocked anguish of a child who realizes that her father’s care for her was contingent upon her political usefulness to him and his reign. When she could not manifest her magic or give him more power, he abused her and locked her away. This deeply dysfunctional relationship stands as a hyperbolic example of narcissistic abuse, for King Roan only values his daughter for what she can give him and sees no reason to make sacrifices for her benefit. His abusive tactics are also apparent in the grim reality that Nyra’s mother died trying to give King Roan a more suitable heir. Thus, Nyra and her mother essentially share similar fates at the king’s hands, which makes Nyra’s choice to use her mother’s name as her pseudonym even more significant. As a father, King Roan abuses Nyra and emotionally abandons her, and he torments her due to his own greed.

Like Nyra, Dacre has a complicated relationship with his father and feels compelled to obey the man’s decrees in order to prove himself loyal to both his family and to the rebellion. This intense connection and sense of obligation makes Dacre vulnerable to acceding to Davian’s unreasonable demands. This problematic dynamic becomes apparent when Wren is taken by the palace guards and held in the dungeon, for in this moment of anguish, Davian is insensitive to Dacre, who thinks, “I gritted my teeth as I listened to my father berate me. As if it was my fault that my sister had been captured. As if I wasn’t already dying inside trying to figure out exactly how we were going to get her out” (19). Significantly, Davian is not upset at the thought that his daughter is in danger; instead, he sees Wren as an asset to the rebellion that is now at risk, and he is angry that recovering this assent now requires him to risk other rebellion assets, such as Dacre. Davian’s callous pragmatism hurts Dacre deeply, for he bitterly yearns for the days when his mother was alive and understands that she, unlike Davian, always loved him and Wren as family before seeing them as soldiers. As Dacre reflects, “Everything about the rebellion had become uncertain since losing my mother” (127). Without his mother, Dacre does not know what the rebellion means to him anymore. His loyalty to the rebellion remains undimmed, but his loyalty to his father begins to erode. Thus, both King Roan and Davian sacrifice their relationships with their children for the sake of their ambitions and political goals, and both Nyra and Dacre suffer deeply for these poor parental choices.

The Moral Ambiguities of Rebellion

The ethics surrounding the rebellion against King Roan’s tyranny are a complex issue in The Veiled Kingdom, for although King Roan is undoubtedly an unethical ruler, Davian’s rebels also engage in morally ambiguous actions and rationalize their violence as a logical response to the king’s tyranny. The complexities of these issues are made clear from the very first chapter, as Nyra succinctly explains the violence that the king enacts on his own citizens. She states, “[The guards] murdered our people for not paying the tithe […], and it was the fear of what they would do to me that overpowered [my] fear of the rebellion” (5). Significantly, even Nyra describes this violence as though her father is not directly responsible for the killings. By saying that the guards are the ones who are murdering those who cannot pay the tithe, Nyra shies away from acknowledging that these cruel actions are sanctioned by the king. Thus, it is clear that although she herself is fleeing the king’s cruelty, she still struggles to understand the depths of her father’s depravity when she encounters it beyond the context of her personal trauma.

Further moral ambiguities await Nyra when she is taken by the rebels and faced with the same ultimatum that Dacre and Davian offer all the potential new recruits: join or die. Witnessing the murder of a loyalist who refuses to join, Nyra must reckon with the fact that the rebellion also commits acts just as cruel as those of her father, and she must find a way to address this hypocrisy. Even before she falls in with the rebels, she considers these dynamics, reflecting:

It was rumored that the rebellion had been gathering strength in secret, driven by the injustices committed by the king […]. They fought for freedom, […] [b]ut they also operated in shadows, their tactics as merciless as those they opposed (14).

Nyra acknowledges that the rebels’ aims are nobler than their tactics, and while her awareness of their organization remains abstract, she has the luxury of believing that their ends justify their means. As someone without magic, she understands that she would greatly benefit from a more egalitarian society. However, when Nyra sees Dacre kill a man for refusing to join the rebellion, her opinion becomes more complex. As she demands of Dacre, “Have you ever stopped to think that the people of Marmoris aren’t fighting for anything other than their own safety? […] [N]ot everyone is worried about the war between a king and this rebellion” (110). With these angry words, she questions the rebels’ policy of executing recruits who show signs of loyalism or do not match their level of zealotry. In this scene, Nyra seeks to add nuance to Dacre’s argument about the justification of violence against the king’s regime. Dacre believes that the rebellion’s use of violence is acceptable because it chips away at the king’s power and hegemony, but Nyra worries that the rebels’ violence is instead doubly punishing the civilians who are just trying to survive. This conflict about the reasons for violence will extend into The Hunted Heir as Nyra finds herself on the wrong side of the rebellion.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text