67 pages • 2 hours read
Rachel KadishA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The narrative resumes in February 1665. A new rabbi, Rabbi Sasportas, has gained influence within the London Jewish community and urges his followers to be more conservative and severe. Rabbi Mendes is less influential, but Ester urges him to consider exploring whether he can publish some of his teachings as a book. One day, Ester also asks Rabbi Mendes about Spinoza, who studied with him in Amsterdam before being excommunicated for his heretical beliefs. Rabbi Mendes expresses his admiration for Spinoza’s intelligence, and his regret that he was unable to find a way for the Jewish community in Amsterdam to accept Spinoza. Rabbi Mendes also admits that he sometimes wishes he could correspond with Spinoza again.
Ester secretly writes to a rabbi in Amsterdam, asking for confirmation as to whether it is completely forbidden for anyone to correspond with Spinoza. She tells herself that she does so in order to potentially help Rabbi Mendes, but she also secretly fantasizes about the many philosophical and theological questions she would like to debate with Spinoza herself.
Shortly afterward, Rabbi Mendes confronts Ester: He has learned that there is a potential offer of marriage for Ester, despite her attempt to hide this information from him. Rabbi Mendes tells Ester that she should marry, especially as he is growing older and sicker. Although he will not force her to marry against her will, he tells her that she can no longer scribe for him. He believes that this work is giving Ester false illusions about the life she can live, distracting her from her true calling to be a wife and mother.
Distressed, Ester flees into the London streets. She bumps into Alvaro HaLevy, who is kind to her and confides that he also feels cursed to a life of unhappiness. Ester wonders if she could reconcile herself to marrying a kind and undemanding man like Alvaro, but finds the idea of hiding her true desires for scholarship and learning repellent. Later, Ester encounters Mary’s mother, Catherine. Catherine explains that Ester is the only person she trusts to provide guidance to Mary, especially since Catherine knows she does not have much longer to live. Ester expresses her desire to never marry, and Catherine hints that many women long for such freedom, although it is difficult to achieve: “[I]f you find a way to live as you wish, unnatural though it might be, you’ll carry on your shoulders the weight of a thousand wives’ wishes” (236). When Ester goes back to the house of the rabbi, she tells Rabbi Mendes that she is not going to marry.
The narrative returns to London in December 2000. Helen marvels over the cross-written document that Aaron found. Right before Aaron called to tell her about the discovery, Helen had a disconcerting conversation with her doctor: Her health is failing much more rapidly than she wants to admit. Helen also thinks back to the day four years earlier when she learned that Dror had died in a car accident. Given his involvement in Israeli intelligence, Helen believes his death could not have been accidental.
Another scholar, Wilton, and three of his graduate students, are now also reviewing the documents. Helen feels protective of the work that she and Aaron have already done, and this creates a new trust and comradery between them. She is grateful when Aaron reveals that he is delaying his work on the cross-written letter, so that it will be longer before Wilton’s team is able to access it: “[F]or some reason he’d bent his neck and knelt beside her on the chopping block” (249).
The narrative resumes in March 1665. Catherine da Costa Mendes has passed away, and Mary’s father now shows little interest in his only child. Ester worries about what will happen to Mary. She agrees to accompany Mary to the theatre one day, even though going to see plays performed is considered risqué and generally unsuitable for young women. Overwhelmed by the crowd and the heat at the theatre, Mary faints; one of the actors, a man named Thomas Farrow, helps Ester and Mary. He is surprised when he subsequently learns that the two young women are Jewish. Ester and Mary also meet two other actors, including a man named John Tilman who seems intrigued by Ester.
Mary quickly begins flirting with Thomas and invites him to come to her home the following day. Ester is hesitant about condoning this behavior, but Mary offers to pay Ester to join as her chaperone. Ester wants the money, so she agrees. As Mary and Ester make their way home, they run into a chaotic scene where a crowd is mocking and taunting two men who have been caught having sex in an inn. Ester is surprised to realize that one of the men is Alvaro HaLevy. Alvaro’s father, Benjamin, arrives, clearly enraged, and drags his son away.
Back at the rabbi’s house, Ester lies and tells Rabbi Mendes that he has received an urgent letter from the Jewish community in Florence concerning false claims from an individual who says that the Messiah has come. Ester knows that the Rabbi will be so committed to providing a response that he will let her act as his scribe one more time, and that is exactly what happens. The Rabbi reluctantly tells Ester that she can act as his scribe while he resolves this problem. Afterward, Ester composes and writes her own letter to a philosopher, Franciscus van den Enden, known to work with Spinoza, asking questions about the ideas that she is most curious about. She signs the letter as Thomas Farrow.
The next day, Ester goes to Mary’s house, where they are joined by Thomas and two of his friends, including John. While Mary and Thomas flirt, Ester and John discuss ideas and intellectual beliefs. After the men leave, Ester cautions Mary again. Ester goes home, and Manuel HaLevy comes to the rabbi’s house. He explains to Ester and to Rabbi Mendes that his father has arranged for Alvaro to be sent away as a laborer on board a ship bound for North America. The Rabbi knows that Alvaro is being sent away as punishment for having relationships with men, and objects to the punishment as being too severe. Ester hastily goes to the HaLevy household to deliver a note dictated by the Rabbi, urging mercy. While she waits at the house, she meets Alvaro, who is clearly terrified by his fate. Manuel and Alvaro’s father makes no reply to the note, and does not change his mind.
Ester and Manuel walk together. Manuel confides that he was the one to request Ester’s hand in marriage. He admires Ester’s strength and confidence, and wants to see it passed down to his children: “I want no faint woman for my wife, though such I may seek for pleasure” (291). At the same time, he believes he can tame her and bend her to his will. He tells Ester that even though she refuses to marry, she will have no alternative once Rabbi Mendes passes away. Ester stubbornly insists that she will never marry. After the conversation with Manuel, Ester secretly writes another letter, this time to the famous philosopher Thomas Hobbes (again signing it Thomas Farrow). She also begins a personal, diary-like document—this is the cross-written document later discovered by Helen and Aaron.
The narrative continues in December 2000, now shortly before Christmas. Aaron continues to work on the documents while feeling melancholy about Marisa’s rejection. He and Helen are alarmed to learn that Wilton and his team of researchers have been given permission to photograph some of the documents, including the letter written to the Jewish community in Florence and the cross-written documents. With the rapid progress of Wilton’s team, and the ability to work from photographs, Helen and Aaron realize that Wilton and his team are likely going to uncover and publish the major revelations of the documents very soon. One of the librarians covertly helps them by bringing them more documents, and they continue their work.
Helen comes across a letter, dated April 1665, that confuses them both. The letter is from the philosopher van den Enden, addressed to someone named Thomas Farrow. The letter cautions Farrow for the bold and reckless ideas he seems to be pursuing. Since Helen and Aaron do not know that by this time, Ester had adopted “Thomas Farrow” as a pseudonym, they wonder if this is a random and unrelated letter that somehow became mixed up with the other documents from the household of Rabbi Mendes. They begin researching Thomas Farrow, who is mentioned in a few sources as a minor 17th-century English philosopher. However, another document quickly reveals some key information: that the female scribe was named Ester Velasquez, that she seemed likely to have begun writing under the pseudonym Thomas Farrow, and that she seemed to have begun writing to notable philosophers, including van den Enden and Hobbes.
This new discovery is more important than ever, and Aaron and Helen want to safeguard it from the other researchers. Aaron tears part of the document and claims to have done it accidentally; since the document will now need to be repaired, there will be a delay before Wilton and his team can access it.
The chapter opens with a series of letters from April 1665. Under the guise of being Thomas Farrow, Ester has been writing to Spinoza. She has also falsified letters so as to give Rabbi Mendes the impression that the controversy in Florence is getting better, but that the community still needs his help. This falsehood gives Ester more time to keep scribing, since the Rabbi feels a moral responsibility to keep helping for as long as the community needs him.
Meanwhile, by May 1665, Ester is still being paid to act as Mary’s chaperone during visits from Thomas. Ester believes that Thomas is mostly attracted by the obvious wealth of Mary’s family, and even worries that Thomas may hold antisemitic beliefs. Thomas’s friend, John, always treats Mary and Ester with respect, but their third companion, Bescos, is often rude. Ester also worries because Rabbi Mendes receives less and less money from students and patrons, and the household has to run on a reduced income.
Ester eventually receives an answer from Spinoza, cautioning her about being too bold and provocative in the way that she interprets and extends his arguments. Ester writes back immediately, refusing to back down from the skeptical and iconoclastic questions she is asking about the nature of God. Later, Rabbi Mendes notices that Ester seems distracted. He explains that while he regrets that Spinoza was excommunicated, he cannot endorse individuals who challenge deeply-held norms out of intellectual arrogance. Rabbi Mendes sadly tells Ester, “[T]o us, he is dead. And even in himself he surely feels this grief. The youth we entrusted with the light of the sages’ wisdom is no more” (335).
The historical plotline in this section of the novel depicts several characters increasingly Choosing Risk Over Caution by challenging the norms and strictures of the Jewish community in London. Mary pursues a romantic relationship with an English, Christian man, Alvaro HaLevy has sex with other men, and Ester begins lying to Rabbi Mendes so that she can carry on correspondence with other thinkers and continue to have access to writing.
All three of these individuals are young, and have lived all or a significant portion of their lives in England. As a result, like many immigrants or children of immigrants, they begin to chafe against more “traditional” values and are intrigued by the more liberal social mores around them. Particularly at this point in time (1665), England was in a historical period known as the Restoration. King Charles II had been restored to the throne in 1660, after years of civil war and an often-repressive regime in power. This period was generally quite socially permissive and celebratory, and this infectious atmosphere is reflected in how Ester is energized by the vibrant urban world around her.
Mary and Ester’s excursion to the theatre is a significant plot point, since it contributes to the rising action by introducing them to John, Bescos, and Thomas Farrow. It also has symbolic and thematic significance. English theatres had been closed during the period in which England was controlled by a Puritan government (1649-1660); although not discussed extensively in the novel, the Puritan movement functions as a subtle corollary to conservative Jewish thought. When theatres reopened, the plays that were staged were often ribald and risqué. As unmarried young women, it was bold for Ester and Mary to go to the theatre. They also faced additional risks as Jewish women: Mary’s decision to wear a cross when she goes out in public symbolizes her desire to assimilate into English society, and also her willingness to compromise her principles in pursuit of pleasure.
The excursion to the theatre also seems to inspire Ester in her eventual duplicity. On stage, actors adopt different personas and names, and pretend to be someone they are not. Significantly, the first pseudonym that Ester adopts for her writings is Thomas Farrow, the name of an actor, implying that she is inspired by the idea of playing a role. Ester’s use of a male pseudonym to protect her identity and increase the chances of her ideas being taken seriously reflects a practice that women have adopted at many points in history. For example, several 19th-century female novelists published their novels under male pseudonyms. By calling herself Thomas Farrow, Ester assumes multiple intersecting types of privilege: by using this name she can “pass” not just as a man, but as a Christian, English man.
This identity gives Ester significant protection and privilege to explore her intellectual interests, feeding her Love of Learning and Scholarship. The social capital wielded by men with these identities may explain why both Mary and Ester (and, decades earlier, Ester’s grandmother) fall in love with Englishmen. They can see in Thomas and John a kind of freedom denied to them not just by gender, but through a historical legacy. Mary has significantly more money than the men, but she still sees a special kind of power that they have which she lacks.
While Mary and Ester chafe against the social constraints they face as women, Alvaro’s storyline reveals that many people suffered when they challenged social norms in pursuit of their authentic desires. Similarly to how Ester is compelled by an irrepressible desire to write and discuss ideas, Alvaro takes significant risks to follow his desire to be with other men. He faces extremely harsh consequences, which foreshadow that the risks Mary and Ester are taking are also dangerous. Alvaro’s banishment, which is effectively a death sentence, parallels how Spinoza was excommunicated by the Jewish community in Amsterdam. The inclusion of this storyline highlights how LGBTQ+ history has also often been lost, repressed, or excluded from traditional historical records. Just as there were 17th-century women who longed for an intellectual life, there were individuals who longed to be in relationships with members of the same sex, but their stories have rarely been shared.
In the modern storyline, a growing comradery develops between Helen and Aaron, especially in the wake of their initial antagonism. Two factors affect this new dynamic in their relationship: They have a new intimacy after Helen shared about her relationship with Dror, and they face a common opponent in the form of Wilton’s research team. Helen’s reserve was misinterpreted by Aaron as coldness; he can now feel a much deeper connection, and even affection, for her, once he knows more about her history. Just as the reveal of Ester’s inner thoughts and feelings creates a sense of emotional connection to her, Aaron can only connect with Helen once he knows the truth of who she is. Throughout the novel, the narrative shows that the tendency to hide one’s true self and one’s history is sometimes necessary, but always ultimately limiting. It is only because they truly know one another that, now, “a laugh escaped [Helen], a bark of reprieve” (247), suggesting that authenticity can help lower the Barriers Between Individuals From Different Cultures and Beliefs.
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
British Literature
View Collection
Historical Fiction
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Popular Study Guides
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection