43 pages • 1 hour read
Sarah VowellA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
A congregation of English Puritan soon-to-be emigrants listens to the famous Reverend John Cotton deliver a “farewell sermon” in 1630 before they set sail on the Arbella and trailing vessels for New England. This moment is the first in a long line of expansionist ideology that starts with these British colonists and persists through American history. These early 17th century historical actors were “watering the seeds of American exceptionalism” that equated certain groups of people occupying the North American continent with God’s chosen people (6).
Vowell explains the immediate context for the Puritan voyage. In the early 1500s, the Protestant Reformation fractured once-Catholic Europe. However, in England, the early reformation was not thorough: Henry VIII “rebelled and established himself as the head of the Church of England in 1534” (6), but aside from a split with the Catholic Pope, the Church of England mirrored the Catholic Church quite closely. This continuity led to dissent within England from people wishing to fundamentally reform the Church. The debates about “how Protestant to become or how Catholic to remain” continued for nearly a century before emigrants left to start colonies across the Atlantic. Unlike the Puritan separatists (Pilgrims) who left England in 1620 on the Mayflower, the 1630 Puritans did not intend to fully leave their church or their affiliation with England behind.
Touching on her theme of wordiness, Vowell describes the Puritans establishing a literate tradition that centered on reading the Bible and talking about religion. They immediately established universities and wrote enough to fill libraries. American popular culture depicts Puritans as everything from illogical religious zealots to principled pioneers worthy of emulation. The book promises to be an examination rooted more in historical sources and fact than popular culture and mythology.
The author stresses that myths about the Puritans are alive and well in American popular culture and in the colloquial American lexicon: “Puritan [is] shorthand for a bunch of generic, boring, stupid, judgmental killjoys” (22). Vowell would rather revise this public image to one of “very specific, fascinating, sometimes brilliant, judgmental killjoys who rarely agreed on anything except that Catholics are going to hell” (22). While modern American culture retains its oversimplified characterization of Puritans, it has largely lost their actual words apart from a few key figures and speeches.
Vowell names and briefly discusses some of these icons, including John Winthrop, whose famous “A Model of Christian Charity” speech articulated the idea of Puritan supremacy and collective responsibility to set an example for the world. Vowell traces this mindset of righteousness (coming from England and adopted in the US) through the centuries. The Massachusetts Bay Colony’s emblematic seal features an Indian saying, “Come over and help us” (25)—an English invention that cemented the paternalist idea that Puritans were “helping” primitive savages. This rhetoric endured as a pattern of foreign policy through US invasions of the Philippines, Vietnam, the Persian Gulf, and Iraq.
On the Arbella, Winthrop’s writings not only sought to comfort the nervous colonists on their trip to a new continent, but also to “justify the venture” (27). The trip was both an escape from an overcrowded, expensive England that sat on the border of European religious warfare, and a Christianization mission to lands that God had apparently conveniently cleared for them.
The last part of this section explains why Puritans were convinced God had cleared the North American continent for their arrival. European germs had been decimating the Native population from the time of the conquistadors, and widespread epidemics led to further disruption and famine. In turn, British political and religious leaders, including Winthrop, boasted of capitalizing on Indigenous death, or what King James called “this wonderful plague among the savages” (31). Anti-Indigenous racism permeated Puritan (and American) literature, justifying the colonization of Native lands.
Vowell explains the religious worldview of John Winthrop and company. His “A Model of Christian Charity” speech delivered that now-famous image of the Puritan “city on a hill,” but that image was “just one more metaphor for the pile” of sources that defined Puritans as God’s chosen people (37). The speech also further articulated central tenets of Puritan theology: “God created all men unequal” and a community needs to work together to have all jobs and duties performed (37-38).
Another critical piece of theology for this particular group of Calvinist Puritans was the doctrine of predestination. Predestination holds that before birth every person already carried God’s judgment of saved or damned, so actions taken during life cannot guarantee a place in heaven. Instead, a person’s actions, at best, could reflect God’s destiny for them. The anxiety surrounding an uncontrollable eternal fate weighed heavily on believers, who suffered “jangling nerves” or went “mad by spiritual doubt” (42). Aiming to reflect God’s grace was the foundation of the “Protestant work ethic”—“tireless labor and ambition in pursuit of salvation” (44). Social pressure not to appear idle continues when modern Americans invoke the term.
Religion was at the center of the Puritan world, but Vowell reminds us that emigration was also a political act. John Winthrop was not only a religious leader, but also the governor of the Massachusetts colony and a lawyer that wrote of “covenants” with God (50). His plea for togetherness and mutual aid addresses both Christian values and skills that would be necessary for survival. The author attributes Massachusetts’s eventual status as a commonwealth to this ideology, and credits it for the community bonding she witnessed in the wake of the 9-11 terrorist attack on New York City.
The colonists suffered greatly, but were still “at the grace note before the downbeat of gloom,” anticipating with excitement the possibilities of their ordained venture but knowing, as Winthrop did, that their example had the potential to become “a lighthouse of doom” (54-55; 58).
Vowell’s book relies heavily on humor. Vowell offers numerous sarcastic and blunt characterizations of her subjects, calling them “communitarian English majors,” “quill-crazy New Englanders” who were “overwhelmingly, fanatically literary” (13). Vowell also infuses the Puritan world of suffering and austerity with elements of comedy that liven up the seemingly dull, dangerous, and monotonous setting. Often, the jokes are indirect discourse, as Vowell attributes comical thoughts to her subjects. Her Puritans, hardening their resolve to thrive in New England, think, “They can do this. They can vomit their way across the sea. They can spend ten years digging up tree stumps to plow frozen fields. They can even learn to love corn” (4).
Finally, she uses humor to characterize the English history and culture that birthed these Puritans in the first place: Protestant Reformation landed in Europe when “Henry VIII had a crush on a woman who was not his wife” (6). The oversimplification is at once ludicrous and accurate—Henry VIII really did wish to divorce his wife in favor of a new one, breaking with the Catholic Church that controlled England when it would not allow him to do so. Vowell’s purposefully undercutting and anachronistic descriptions of historical events make them relatable to the modern reader while highlighting their inherent ridiculousness: A man invented the Church of England and became its leader because of his personal romantic life.
These wry jokes at the expense of the colonists contrast with the book’s more sober reminders of the long and damaging legacies of colonialism. Vowell cites colonial warfare, westward expansion to Oregon and California, imperialist campaigns at the turn of the 20th century, Cold War invasions after the mid-century mark, and many other examples as influenced by the ideologies of British colonies absorbed into the emergent American nation.
We get a sense of the Puritan faith that shaped Massachusetts Bay. Convinced that God intended for them to settle the continent, the Puritans were unprepared for environmental challenges and became “racist, persnickety, Indian-killing” (57). But Vowell also admits a sympathy and fondness for John Winthrop when he urged his community to love one another. Many distorted images of Puritanism and early British colonists litter modern American popular culture, but Winthrop’s desire to “rejoice together, mourn together, labor and suffer together” and altogether commune together felt utterly immediate and important to the author following the September 11 attack on the World Trade Centers in the author’s home city (52).