43 pages • 1 hour read
Sarah VowellA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Vowell takes up Williams’s account of his time spent with the Narragansetts, especially when he was first in exile in the winter of 1636. Though Williams used words like “barbarian” to describe his Native rescuers (152), he also genuinely complimented their kindness, hospitality, and trustworthiness. In his 1643 book, A Key into the Language of America, Williams recorded Algonquian phrases that he had evidently learned from his Narragansett friends: “Come hither, friend” and “Welcome, sleep here” (153). Other Englishmen also commented on Narragansett generosity in their writings.
Williams disapproved of the Native religion he observed. Because the Narragansett were polytheists who were rather uninterested in conversion, Williams assumed their faith was based on devil worship. Williams’s translated phrases record conversations in which Native people challenged Williams’s explanations of monotheism and beliefs like the resurrection of Christ (161). Still, to Vowell, “the New England Indians seem strangely similar to the New England Puritans” (161) because religion dictated so much about each culture’s way of life.
Indigenous and English also shared a great affinity for fur products from semiaquatic rodents like beavers. Williams recorded fur-trade-related phrases in his Key because he made “his living […] by operating a trading post” (165). Vowell introduces the subject of the next section, the Pequot War, which was centrally about “access to and control of trade in Connecticut” (166).
The Pequot War of the mid-1630s was a “pure war […] fueled by misunderstanding, jealousy, hatred, stupidity, racism, lust for power, lust for land, and, most of all, greed, all of it headed toward a climax of slaughter” (166). The English and Dutch fought this war against “The Pequot, the Narragansett, and the Mohegan [which were] sovereign nations with a long history of resentment that predates European contact” (167). Vowell compares preexisting intertribal conflicts to those of European countries who regularly warred, like England and France, or competed for trade, like England and the Netherlands.
The Pequot War was “a destructive tantrum brought on by an accumulation of aggravation” (172). Puritans in Boston suffered internal strife as the Puritan Thomas Hooker left Boston to establish Hartford in Connecticut. Simultaneously, the Dutch had just unleashed violence on Native people they encountered in trade lands. Meanwhile, fighting among the Mohegan, the Pequot, and the Narragansett was mounting, just as a smallpox epidemic was killing members of all three Indigenous nations.
The Pequot established an alliance with the English, with recently exiled Williams playing the role of “Indian ambassador, negotiator, and spy” (176). But after Niantic Indians killed a Puritan settler, the English instead allied with the Narragansett who avenged the murder and moved on the Pequot in retribution for an earlier murder.
Skirmishes led to the Mystic massacre: The English and their Narragansett and Mohegan allies ambushed a Pequot village, set it on fire, and blocked the exits until the Pequots inside burned to death. For many Christians, “biblical justification is enough of an air freshener to erase the smell of burning human flesh” (194)—God had sanctioned the murder or women and children throughout scripture.
Vowell’s sister and young nephew accompany her on one of her research trips. In school, standard history curriculum has exposed the young boy to the Thanksgiving myth—that settlers and Indians existed harmoniously as friends and equals. When the family visits Mashantucket Pequot Museum and watches a movie about the aforementioned massacre, Vowel’s nephew is confused and upset. American children seldom learn the brutal elements of foundational American history. Vowell tells her nephew about the volume of warfare across the continent and centuries.
Vowell considers the Pequot War, thinking about the various Indian nations involved in it—those that got slaughtered and those that did the slaughtering. The history is complex. For instance, in facilitating and contributing to English-endorsed violence against the Pequot, the Mohegan headman Uncas ensured Mohegan survival: “What he did wasn’t pretty. It wasn’t even right. But it worked” (202).
Vowell and her family stay at the Mohegan Sun Casino, owned and operated by the tribe. The enterprise is proof that the Mohegan maintained a piece of their homelands through challenges to Native sovereignty.
When the complicit Narragansett sachem, Miantonomi, attempted to resist the English following the Mystic massacre by attempting to unite Native tribes, the English had him assassinated. Future Native leaders from various nations would adopt similar pan-Indian rhetoric and goals, but the consequences for the Narragansett were disastrous. The English and their Anglo-American descendants committed massacres against Native communities for several centuries.
This part of the book is centrally concerned with the Native experience of colonialism, even though many of the historical sources referenced are English. Vowell humanizes the proximate groups of Native people in the story against the grain of inescapably racist historical commentary. Even White contemporaries who, like Roger Williams, acknowledged Indian generosity and goodness, also called them things like “lost” souls (159), “wild brethren and sisters” (163), and “[partakers] of Satan’s inventions and worships” (158).
The book traces the shifting balance of power on the continent between Whites and Indigenous. When Roger Williams fled Salem, savvy and friendly Narragansetts supported him through this immensely difficult time. They also held the upper hand in power dynamics since Williams was a lone Englishman in established Native society. However, during the tragic Pequot War, colonizers exploited the struggle for power among sovereign Native nations to gain dominance.
Vowell dramatically illustrates the logical conclusion of the Puritan conviction that God had ordained their presence on the continent. During the Pequot War, the “climax of slaughter” is the attack on a palisaded Pequot village at Mystic, where English burned alive Pequot families in the middle of the night (166). Christians that defined themselves wholly by their religion and God-granted entitlement to land and resources perpetrated this brutal, irredeemable wartime violence was.
The story of the war is quite complicated, so Vowell uses broad strokes to paint the most influential episodes. Also, “Indian troubles” (202), as Vowell calls them, did not end with the War. As Native resistance developed, the English and their remaining Native allies stifled movements that could have severely changed the face of English colonialism.
Vowell communicates the complexity and contingency of history. Her own family, which has Cherokee roots, disapproves of Uncas’s perceived treachery. It is not easy to identify good guys or bad guys, especially from the vantage point of the 2st century looking back on the 17th. Historical distance has distorted our access to historical events and their implications.