54 pages • 1 hour read
Anne EnrightA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This guide section depicts physical and emotional abuse.
The relationship between Carmel and Nell is the centerpiece of the novel. This dynamic informs the tensions that Enright often untangles in her work, much more than either woman’s relationships to the men in their lives since these men—Phil, Ronan, Felim, and David—merely expose or affect the way Carmel and Nell engage with each other.
The novel begins by showing that Nell values her independence from Carmel, which is typical of any woman entering new adulthood. They are not separated by a great distance, which enables Nell to visit Carmel on the weekends. When she does, however, she says very little about her life, which she ties to Carmel’s tendency to judge and downplay the suffering of others. Nell doesn’t fear Carmel’s judgment so much as she has learned to manage its inevitability in her life. What she wants but doesn’t get from Carmel is understanding. Instead, she turns to Phil’s poetry for support, unaware of the ways that Carmel has accidentally replicated her traumatic childhood with Nell.
Carmel embraces pragmatism in her solitary life and relationship with Nell. From her perspective, her quick judgment isn’t meant to invalidate the suffering of others but rather to encourage Nell to push on in the face of difficulty. At one point, she compares men and women by saying that men show up for appointments, no matter what obstacles come up on their way to meet them. She nevertheless remains protective and supportive of Nell, going out of her way to care for Nell whenever she expresses that she isn’t feeling well or indulging her request for money to travel.
While Carmel has done her best to avoid replicating the traumas and abuse that she experienced in her childhood, she comes to understand how much her relationship with her father mirrors the complex way she regards Nell. During the brief period that Ronan spends within their small family, Carmel looks at her daughter with jealousy, turning her into a rival for Ronan’s attention. Carmel wants to exclusively possess Ronan’s niceness because it has been so absent from her life. The threat Carmel feels extends beyond the end of the relationship when she physically assaults Nell for mocking her frustration with a malfunctioning kitchen lightbulb. In the wake of that moment, the biggest thing Carmel realizes is that she hasn’t escaped her abusive upbringing. She has merely replicated her father’s behavior in ways she hadn’t anticipated while raising Nell.
The novel resolves the fraught love between Carmel and Nell by letting them each go on their journeys of self-awareness. Nell tries to distance herself from all the things that cause her anxiety, only to realize how fond she is of home. She watches a video of Phil and finds herself affectionally recognizing everyone from her family in him, including herself. Carmel, on the other hand, watches the same video, reads Phil’s poetry, and understands how she has let down Nell. When Nell returns home with David, his presence becomes a test for Nell and Carmel to manage their relationship more healthily. Rather than repress her true desires, Nell stands up to Carmel when her judgmental tendencies present themselves. Carmel likewise copes with her feelings for Nell’s sake but ultimately accepts David’s value when she comes upon them in an intimate embrace, which reminds her of the way the two of them used to be when Nell was still a child.
Nell is obsessed with bridging the gap between people through language, which is why she opens the novel with the suggestion that the key function of human connection isn’t empathy but translation. From her perspective, anyone and anything can be understood if one arrives at the words to capture that object’s inner state. The imperative to define the world through language stems primarily from Nell’s fears of losing things to obliteration, the decay of the material world, and the loss of memory. These assumptions are, however, fundamentally why her relationship with Felim frustrates her so much.
Felim is someone Nell feels an intense love almost as soon as she meets him. Because the feeling is so tangible and she can compare her experience to the experience of deaf children hearing for the first time, Nell assumes that her love possesses the texture of validity. The deeper they get into their relationship, the more Nell realizes she has much less power in governing the dynamic between them. One crucial moment sees Nell confronting Felim about their exclusivity. When Felim expresses that he hadn’t known they were exclusive, it leaves Nell feeling like a fool, as she thought Felim reciprocated her intense feelings. Nell becomes increasingly alienated by the incongruence of Felim’s words and actions. She cannot trust the gesture that meeting his family represents because he antagonizes her almost immediately after they leave. She cannot figure out why Felim would present his ex as his former romantic partner, even when all signs point to them still being together. When Felim finally breaks up with Nell, he calls her “babe,” a pet name he had never given her before. This raises the question of whether Felim means to break up with Nell or someone else. Unable to arrive at the truth on her own, Nell escapes.
Nell’s reliance on language stems from the imagined relationship she has with her poet grandfather, Phil—itself, a connection built entirely through language rather than experience. Since Phil died before Nell was born, Nell hasn’t had the opportunity to know Phil through his affections and flaws. All she has are the lines that speak directly to Nell’s experience. As Phil says in a television interview, the only poems he writes speak of unrequited love, primarily because he doesn’t think any other kind of poem is possible. This frames the world through a very specific lens, which may or may not accurately represent all of Nell’s reality. Hence, her frustration gradually turns into despair. An escape from anxiety transforms into a personal quest for meaning.
Nell realizes that language may not be enough to capture the world and preserve it from obliteration. The novel ends with her encountering a bullfinch in her mother’s back garden. While trying to describe the bullfinch, Nell realizes that the attempt to comprehensively represent it through language is counterproductive. It does a disservice to the reality of the bullfinch to describe it because a bullfinch is so much more than the words people ascribe to it, all the way down to its name. This revelation implicitly allows her to distinguish between poetry’s function as a beautiful object and language’s capacity as a carrier for truth. In poems, meaning can arise from the tension between what it says and what it does not say. She thus cannot mistake language for reality and thinks herself so important as the only thing standing between the world and its eventual eradication.
The novel reckons with the divide between one’s public and private personalities, which not only refers to fame but also extends to the mediums through which people convey themselves to a larger public, such as social media. Across three generations of characters, Enright explores how one’s public persona clashes against personal memories and encounters, disadvantaging the latter.
Phil is the most apparent demonstration of this theme since his family life directly suffers from his behavior. Nevertheless, his reputation remains intact because of the legacy he leaves behind in the world of writing. Ronan recalls the stories of Phil’s life with mythical reverence, unaware of how the same stories evoke Carmel’s memories of Phil’s abusive behavior. It makes little sense for Carmel to speak these memories aloud to Ronan because of her pragmatism. Ronan admires Phil as a titan of poetry, making him much less interested in his moral character than he is in his capacity to assert his identity as a poet. Consequently, the women in Phil’s life, from his first girlfriend to Nell, are known popularly through their romanticized depictions in his work. This overrides their attempts to define themselves by their actions.
Apart from Phil, Enright also explores this divide through Nell’s relationship with her influencer client, Meg, for whom she writes lifestyle blog posts. Nell lends her voice to boost Meg’s celebrity platform, requiring her to create a certain kind of affectation that will resonate with Meg’s audience. When Nell leans too much into topics that reflect her actual state of mind, her client rejects them for publication. This underlines the discrepancy between honesty and acceptability in the public sphere. While Meg is catering to a specific audience, her rejection emphasizes that Nell’s ideas aren’t suitable for her branding. She prioritizes business interests over personal ones.
The novel highlights, however, that the public record is never fully set in stone. With the passage of time and the change in wider cultural values, people start to reconsider how they regard public personalities. Nell receives a letter from Connie that marks a turning point in Phil’s reputation. When Connie indicates that she is reckoning with her relationship with Phil in light of the turbulent and, at times, abusive relationship he had with the poet Selma Karras, it suggests the possibility that the wider public will follow suit. This does not mean that they will downgrade the value of his poetic legacy but that the details of his private life will allow them to consider his personality more truthfully. They can better regard him as a person and as a man, including one who inflicted violence and harm toward others, rather than as a mythical figure free from any flaws.
By Anne Enright