52 pages • 1 hour read
Jennifer HillierA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Paris’s attorney gives her good news: The border-security surveillance cameras confirm Paris’s timeline for her return from Vancouver. She could not have killed Jimmy. In addition, the official coroner’s report lists the cause of death as undetermined. The knife wound could have been self-inflicted. The DA withdraws the murder charge. Paris is released. She is free now, she tells herself, to grieve. She returns home, still haunted by Jimmy’s death. She settles down to music when there is a knock at the patio door. She is stunned to see Drew there.
Paris is confused—she knew Drew when she was Joey Reyes, not Paris Peralta. “The past is melding with the present” (297). Drew assures her that he did not come all the way from Toronto to hurt her or mess up her life. “I just needed to see for myself that you’re really alive” (298). Paris bursts into tears, and they hug. “For nineteen years,” Drew tells her, “I blamed myself for your death” (300). Now Drew wants an explanation.
Paris tells Drew everything about that New Year’s night, even the $100,000 that she made off with. Drew is uncertain whether to trust Paris even now. Paris opens up. “You don’t know what it’s like to be born into a life of cruelty and abuse, and you don’t know what it’s like to have to claw your way out in order to have any sense of self-worth” (302). Paris suggests that Drew spends the night so that they can talk in the morning. Drew agrees to stay.
In the morning, Paris, who expected Drew to leave (like everyone in her life has), is surprised to find Drew in the kitchen making coffee. Paris is happy—it feels “exactly right” to have Drew with her (306). Zoe stops by and reminds Paris that now she is a millionaire. Zoe suggests that Paris should begin to direct some of the inheritance money into the charitable foundations that Jimmy started. Paris agrees. Then Elsie arrives.
Drew agrees to stay in Jimmy’s room. Paris remembers that, shortly before his death, Jimmy complained about the tremors in his hand and that this signaled “the beginning of the end” (312). As she helps Drew to get his things in the room, Paris notices that Jimmy’s collection of expensive straight razors is all there in the drawer in his bedroom. Four of them. However, crime-scene photos showed that two razors were missing on the night of Jimmy’s death. The police had taken one as evidence. How had the fourth razor returned to its place? Paris thinks back. The police confiscated Jimmy’s cassette player—he would practice telling his jokes into the machine to work out his timing. Right before Jimmy shut off the cassette player the night that he was killed, Paris remembers hearing Elsie in the background. Paris turns now to confront Elsie.
Paris knows now that Elsie had been in the house the night that Jimmy died. Elsie knew the codes to the home security system and could easily have wiped away any evidence that she had been there. Paris states: “You killed him […] And then you tried to make it look like a suicide” (318). Elsie collapses and confesses. She was despondent that she had lost Jimmy to Paris. It was never about money. For more than 50 years, Elsie had loved Jimmy from afar: “I wanted him” (319). However, she felt spurned by Jimmy. When Elsie saw the revised will and saw the amount that Jimmy was planning to leave to his wife of all of three years, she told him that he would be “crazy” (319) to give so much money to a new wife he barely knew. When he casually told her to “get a life” (319), to stop depending so much on their friendship to give her life purpose, she snapped: “After everything I’ve done, that he would say that to me” (319).
Elsie is arrested and confesses. She had only meant to get Jimmy’s attention by waving the straight razor. They struggled, and the slash was an accident. She had tried to make the scene look like death by suicide. The DA agrees to charging her with manslaughter.
Leaving the police station, Paris asks Drew about why he never married. He admits that he has never been able to sustain a relationship since Paris—no woman has compared to her. Drew tells her that they need to return to Toronto and settle with Ruby, who now wants $10 million.
The novel’s denouement speech occurs at the close of Chapter 44, when all the revelations about Jimmy’s death are brought to light. “When was the last time you saw Jimmy?” (316) This question, posed by Paris to Elsie Dixon, triggers the denouement. At this point, the novel both completes and then upends the conventional expectations of a whodunit. A killing needs a killer. Paris, freed from the murder charge, now has the conventional revelatory moment when pieces finally fall into place and the killer’s identity becomes clear. With the intuitive insight typical of conventional whodunit detectives, Paris sees what has been in front of her since the night she was arrested: Elsie had been in the house the night of the killing and only Elsie had the opportunity to attack Jimmy.
The plan to kill Jimmy and let everyone assume that it was the death by suicide that he had tried years earlier wraps up the murder mystery. However, it is the motive that twists the novel toward further drama because the motive was nothing less than The Resiliency of Love. “I didn’t want his money,” Elsie says in her defense, “I wanted him” (319). In the end she simply wanted to “have some time together” (319). The bathos of this moment—the motive is nothing salacious or dramatic—paradoxically builds the drama because it presents a romantic rival to Paris. In many ways the actual killing is also anticlimactic. Elsie admits that the stabbing was an accident, that she had waved the razor only as a way to get Jimmy’s attention, to make sure he understood the depth of her emotional commitment to him. This climax reflects the fact that the drama of the novel is centered not on “whodunit” but on the questions surrounding Paris’s identity.
Elsie’s defense—she loved him so much that she killed him—threatens to leave the novel in a dark place of contradiction and irony. However, the novel does not end with the revelation of the murderer and the tidy deal that Elsie brokers with the DA. Love is not left vilified as a crass motive for killing; Hillier moves on during the falling action to leave the novel on a positive note regarding the resiliency of love. Emerging as a sweet descant is the story of the return of Drew Morgan. His appearance at Paris’s patio door signals that the novel will not give darkness the final say. “It has been suggested,” Drew says almost sheepishly to Paris, “that the reason my relationships don’t progress to the serious stage anymore is because they don’t measure up to the relationship I imagined I would have had with you” (323). With that, the novel upends the conventional tidiness of a whodunit and becomes a romantic narrative. Revelation, it appears, is not the endgame. The closing pages of Part 5 float the possibility, as Drew and Paris head to Toronto to deal with Ruby, that love, not death, may have the last word.
By Jennifer Hillier
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Canadian Literature
View Collection
Horror, Thrillers, & Suspense
View Collection
Mothers
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Psychological Fiction
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection