logo

79 pages 2 hours read

William Makepeace Thackeray

Vanity Fair: A Novel Without a Hero

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1847

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

Vanity Fair

Vanity Fair is a term borrowed from Pilgrim’s Progress by John Bunyan. In Bunyan’s work, the Fair is visited by the narrator on a pilgrimage. A town named Vanity (hinting at the deadly sin of pride) hosts a fair that never ends, in which the attendees are devoted to their luxurious possessions and lavish lifestyles rather than anything substantive or moral. As such, the Fair functions as a symbol of the decadence of high society. The Fair is not a fixed place or an event. Instead, Vanity Fair is a metaphorical device used by the narrator to refer to the extravagant, wasteful lifestyles of the undeserving and idle wealthy people of Britain. The Fair is an idea, present in the courts, ballrooms, and sitting rooms of the elite. The Fair is governed by a system of social etiquette and expectation, a system which is taught to the children of the elite from a young age at institutions such as Miss Pinkerton’s academy. In this way, the metaphorical Vanity Fair becomes internalized in the minds of the rich and powerful from a young age. They are captured by the decadence and permitted to revel in their own indulgences, all while presenting themselves as the mannered, deserving products of a thriving society.

The metaphor of Vanity Fair functions as a social critique when employed by the narrator. While the Fair may seem spectacular from the outside, the souls of the attendees are vapid and hollow. The lives of the people of Vanity Fair lack substance. Their shallow existences are unrelentingly hedonistic and meaningless, providing them with nothing beyond physical pleasure and aesthetic delight. They own expensive clothes, visit extravagant homes, and travel across Europe, but this lifestyle is built on a foundation of debt and immorality. They cheat with one another, flaunting the moral code that supposedly governs their lives. They flit between creditors, paying off one loan by taking out another. The narrator leads the audience behind the curtain of this elaborate display of decadence, revealing the moral rot at the core of the Fair. The Fair symbolizes the rot at the heart of British society, a colonial enterprise that is itself built on a similar system of exploitation and extraction. As the attendees of the Fair ignore the debts and immorality that fuel their decadence, the British ignore the pain and misery caused in the far-flung colonies that have turned Britain into one of the world’s foremost superpowers. The symbolic meaning of the Fair extends beyond the high society, hinting at a broader system of colonial exploitation.

Becky’s role as the protagonist of Vanity Fair is to enter the metaphorical Fair as an outsider. She quickly understands the reality of the Fair and, due to her outsider status, she is more willing to acknowledge the hypocrisies and absurdities of life among the elite. She borrows money, she exploits the labor of others, and she gives herself over to indulgence. While she might not be born into the elite, Becky helps to embody the metaphorical meaning of Vanity Fair by completely subscribing to the ideology and hypocrisy of the Fair itself. Her fall from grace, however, means that she is ultimately excluded from the Fair. Becky’s cynical, honest interpretation of the Fair is too damaging to the egos of those involved. If a girl from a poor background can manipulate the Fair in such a fashion, she threatens to undermine the entire enterprise. As such, she is sent away and denied entry to the symbolism of the Fair. 

The Puppet Show

Vanity Fair employs a framing device in which the narrator acts out the events of the play using a puppet show. Each character is a puppet, being controlled by the narrator as a way to entertain and educate the audience. This framing device has an important metaphorical meaning, conveying to the audience the role of performance in the British society depicted in the novel. The characters are rarely themselves in public. Instead, they are performing the role which is expected of them by the society. Becky charms and seduces many people, all while keeping her true resentment and bitterness hidden. Amelia denies her love for Dobbin for many years, continuing to perform the role of the grieving widow which she believes society expects of her. The entire society is an elaborate performance of manners, in which the characters are mere puppets controlled by the social expectations thrust upon them. They are taught a system of manners and etiquette at a young age and this system governs their lives, as the strings of the puppet dictate the puppet’s movement. Rather than expressing their true desires or motivations, the characters are compelled by social expectation to perform the role expected of them. Their lives are, as the framing device suggests, an elaborate puppet show in which their agency is surrendered to social expectation.

The metaphor of the puppet show also hints at the amount of agency which is given to the characters. Someone like Becky might seem to be radical and disruptive, but she is beholden to the broader powers that govern her society. Becky defies expectations and rises above the lifestyle expected of her. She achieves these lofty ambitions by bending the rules of Vanity Fair to her will. She charms, seduces, and manipulates people. She borrows money and throws extravagant parties at other people’s expense. For all her individualism and refusal to adhere to social expectations, however, Becky is ultimately as much of a puppet as everyone else. She is bound to the rules of society, just like everyone else. When her relationship with Lord Steyne threatens to undermine his status, for example, these same systems of etiquette are used to discipline Becky. She is threatened through intermediaries and banished from various European social enclaves. Her admittance to the Fair is denied, as she still lacks the agency over her life which would distinguish her from a puppet. The “famous little Becky Puppet” (6) may attract the audience’s attention with her uncommon flexibility but she remains, ultimately, as much a puppet as everyone else.

The metaphor of the puppet show is also used by the narrator to implicate the audience in his social criticism. At the end of the novel, as the performance of the puppets draws to a close, the narrator separates himself from the narrator. The framing device returns, as the narrator calls on the audience to “shut up the box and the puppets” (809). The performance is over, he hints, but he asks which members of the audience can consider themselves truly happy. The audience, like the characters and the narrator himself, is bound by the same social expectations which turn Becky, Amelia, Dobbin, and the others into mere puppets. The narrator uses the performance of the puppet play to elucidate the audience’s complicity in the decadence and hedonism of the society. They have watched the puppet show, they have been thrilled by the travails of the characters, and—as a result—the audience must reflect on their own happiness and their own performance. Social expectations govern everything and this governance extends beyond the closed box which now contains the puppets. The performance is over for the puppets, the narrator says, but the performance shown by the audience continues in earnest.

Debts

The excesses of Vanity Fair are fueled by money. This money, however, is rarely paid in full. Most characters are beholden to an elaborate web of debts and creditors which police their behavior. Though George and Rawdon are born into wealthy families, for example, they cannot afford the extravagant lifestyles which the Fair offers to them. They borrow money from many places with disastrous results. When George dies, his heavy debts mean that his fellow soldiers must step in to cover the costs of his surviving family. Amelia and Georgy never truly comprehend just how much George was in debt at the time of his death as he struggled to keep up with the financial demands of a lifestyle he could not afford. Likewise, Rawdon is arrested for his failure to pay his debts. After his arrest, he is taken to a special prison where men of his status are held until their debts are settled. Inside this special prison, the men eat well and drink expensive wine. That such an institution exists—and seems to be presented as normal part of society—illustrates just how extensively the system of debts has permeated the society and how often these debts need to be settled.

The decadence of Vanity Fair is built on other people’s money, but the existence of these debts is often hidden. There is a shameful quality to the debts, as they remind the characters of the fundamentally unfair structure of society. Debts, the characters believe, are a demeaning problem which should only concern poor people. The poor are expected to pay their debts, while the rich can rely on social etiquette to protect them from ever having to pay back the money they owe. The rich accrue debts (both moral and financial) from the poor, either by exploiting their labor, extracting colonial wealth, or simply lying. They never expect these debts to be called in, though—in the event that they are, such as Rawdon’s arrest —the rich can rely on other rich people to treat them comfortably. The way in which debts are hidden is a metaphorical hint of the guilt which undergirds British society. There is a moral debt to be paid for such indulgence, but the rich and powerful simply choose to ignore their obligation to other people so as to continue their hedonistic pursuit of pleasure.

Becky’s attitude to debt is so cynical that it becomes devastating. She correctly deduces that the entire Vanity Fair is built on a system of debts and payments, while also realizes that there are few consequences for the rich and powerful should they decide to simply not pay back the money they owe. As a result, she accrues massive debts on behalf of herself and her husband and deliberately chooses not to pay anyone. Her dismissal of the debts is honest and direct; while other rich people might functionally do the same thing, they either hide their debts or pretend that they will eventually pay back the money. Becky’s cynical abandonment of this pretense becomes intolerable for society. Her manipulation of the debts is no different from many other people in the social elite but her attitude is too cynical to be allowed. She is eventually driven out of high society, pushed to the fringes of the Fair because she threatens to reveal the truth about what is owed to the poor by the rich.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text