40 pages • 1 hour read
Louise LevathesA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
One of the book’s main themes is the seafaring tradition of China. The author gives copious information about this throughout different stages of China’s history. This may come as a surprise to some, as China is often thought of as a land-based and agricultural nation. Part of the book’s purpose is to highlight this tradition, which declined precipitously following the age of the treasure ships. Levathes’ point is that the more recent status was the exception, not the rule. For centuries before the Ming dynasty, China was active in the Pacific and Indian Oceans.
The main source of this tradition comes from the Yi peoples in China’s eastern and southern coastal regions. Cut off by mountains from the fertile lands inland, they turned to the sea rather than agriculture for sustenance, and their nautical knowledge spread to many other countries. They “are believed to be the world’s first ‘boat people,’ that is, the first people to cross a body of water and settle a new land”—first doing so during the last Ice Age 50,000 years ago (23). Some scholars believe that the Yi were the ancestors of Indonesians and Polynesians, both of whom have strong seafaring traditions. Their knowledge and skills were such that by the time of the Common Era, they reached the Americas in one direction and the east coast of Africa in the other. This runs counter to the narratives propagated across the Western world that Christopher Columbus was the first to reach the Americas by sea.
Part of the reason behind China’s erasure from nautical history stems from its isolation during the period when seafaring mercantile capitalism exploded during the 16th and 17th centuries. Thus, this history is dominated by organizations like the British East India Company, a virtual private army that seized control of oceanic shipping routes and large swaths of India and Southeast Asia. China’s reduced position as a naval and mercantile force eventually led to its defeat by the far more powerful British navy during the Opium Wars of the 19th century. The aftermath of this conflict, during which Britain imposed unequal treaties and greater control over Chinese trade, was one of many factors leading to the dissolution of the Qing empire, the final dynasty in Chinese history. Thus, China’s abandonment of sea travel and trade in the 15th century helped precipitate a broader decline in imperial power, with outcomes that reverberated centuries later.
Another theme that the book explores is how political decisions and debates between competing factions can have much greater consequences than it seems at first glance. From one perspective, decision to end the voyages of the treasure fleet was simply part of an ongoing debate within China over the best way to govern. Levathes frames it as the Confucian scholars versus the eunuchs, with the former advocating an inward-facing policy based on agriculture and the latter an outward-facing policy based on trade and commerce. Each side rose to the fore at various times, influencing different emperors’ reigns, until the Confucians finally prevailed in the mid-15th century. The greater meaning, however, would not be felt until centuries later—and could only be foreseen to the extent that one could predict the future. The ultimate result of the government’s decision to isolate the country came in the 19th century, when a much-weakened China, which had fallen behind in technology, ceded trade control to Western nations whose power had grown in the vacuum created by Chinese isolation.
The story of China’s naval history thus reflects the extent to which highly localized cultural and ideological forces have dramatic geopolitical consequences across centuries. The notion that an ideology like Confucianism played such an outsized role in determining China’s isolationist destiny for hundreds of years is especially ironic, given that the 20th and 21st centuries saw a number of Chinese businesspeople embrace a strain of neo-Confucianism in their affairs with foreign trading partners.
By the early 15th century, China was poised to become the world’s great power. It was in a position to explore the world beyond Africa and the Arab states long before Europeans began their Age of Exploration. They could even have created an extensive network of colonies, given their naval accomplishments and military prowess. Thus, another theme of the book is this “missed opportunity” when the Chinese—on their own initiative—subsequently turned inward. Within a hundred years of their peak, the Chinese virtually banned oceangoing vessels and activities.
At this same time, European nations began to venture out. Levathes previews this already in the Prologue by mentioning the 1498 voyage of Vasco da Gama during which his ships rounded the Cape of Good Hope and reached some of the same coastal regions of East Africa that the Chinese visited decades earlier. She notes, however, that the Portuguese ships were far inferior to those of China’s treasure fleet and wonders if they had met, “would da Gama in his eighty-five to a hundred-foot vessels have dared continue across the Indian Ocean?” (21). Perhaps Zheng might have crushed the Europeans with his firepower and thus prevented their advance to the East. The questions are moot since China had long since receded from the seas and, over time, the Europeans would catch up to and finally surpass the Chinese in technology and maritime skills.
While this is a book of history, as Shakespeare wrote, “What’s past is prologue.” In chapter 11, the author discusses the vast legacy of Zheng He and his treasure fleet. In short, it is largely responsible for the widespread Chinese diaspora in many areas of Asia. Large populations of Chinese live among other peoples outside China, some of whom might be descendants of sailors who deserted from Zheng’s expeditions. Even if not directly related, such people may have traveled to other nations to trade, continuing in the long tradition that the treasure fleet initiated. Chinese culture left its mark in many other ways through the treasure ships. As Levathes writes, “in the hulls of the treasure ships were the calendars, books, musical instruments, weights, and measures that in some small measure spread Chinese culture to every port the fleet touched” (186).